Unit of Dental Hygiene - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatrics - University of Pavia
Pavia, Lombardy, 27100, Italy
NCT Number: NCT06288919
The aim of the study is to assess which prophylaxis methods is the most suitable for peri-implant hygiene between erythritol and ultrasonic scaler with peek inserts.
A randomized clinical trial will be conducted on the patient. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups:
* Erythritol group: erythritol with a particle size of ~14 µm will be used for 5 seconds (AIRFLOW® PLUS EMS) * Ultrasonic scaler group: a piezoelectric handpiece with peek inserts (Mini Piezon EMS; PI EMS) will be used.
Different subgroups will be defined according to the material of the dental crown of the related implant.
The oral hygiene session will be carried out every 6 months (2-years follow-up; 6 sessions), after instruction and motivation of the patient, completion of the clinical chart with the recording of the Probing Depth (evaluation in mm of the peri-implant sulcus taken by a periodontal probe; 4 surfaces of the gingival margin are detected: vestibular, palatal/lingual, mesial, distal), Bleeding on Probing and Plaque Index.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pavia, Lombardy, 27100, Italy
The aim of the study is to assess which prophylaxis methods is the most suitable for peri-implant hygiene between erythritol and ultrasonic scaler with peek inserts.
A randomized clinical trial will be conducted on the patient. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups:
Different subgroups will be defined according to the material of the dental crown of the related implant: feldspathic ceramic, zirconia and lithium disilicate.
The oral hygiene session will be carried out every 6 months (2-years follow-up; 6 sessions), after instruction and motivation of the patient, completion of the clinical chart with the recording of the Probing Depth (evaluation in mm of the peri-implant sulcus taken by a periodontal probe; 4 surfaces of the gingival margin are detected: vestibular, palatal/lingual, mesial, distal), Bleeding on Probing and Plaque Index.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
erythritol with particle size of ~14 µm will be used for 5 seconds (AIRFLOW® PLUS EMS)
ultrasonic scaler, a piezoelectric handpiece with peek inserts (Mini Piezon EMS; PI, EMS) will be used.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), 18 months (T3) 24 months (T4)
Evaluation in mm of the peri-implant sulcus taken by a periodontal probe. 4 surfaces of the gingival margin are detected: vestibular, palatal/lingual, mesial, distal.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), 18 months (T3) 24 months (T4)
Evaluation of the presence or absence of gingival bleeding during a probing with a dichotomous scoring (yes/no) of bleeding sites. The sum of the bleeding sites is divided for the total sites and multiplied per 100.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), 18 months (T3) 24 months (T4)
% assessment of the amount of plaque on dental surfaces; it is detected on 4 surfaces: distal, mesial, vestibular, lingual / palatal. The number of sites with plaque is divided by the total number of sites available in the mouth and multiplied by 100. Results indicate the index as a percentage.
University of Pavia
Other
Erythritol vs Ultrasonic Scaler Prophylaxis Systems on Dental Implants With Different Types of Crowns: 24-months Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05024760
Dental Implant Failed, Implant Infection
Tacoma, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05618171
Dental Implant Failed, Mouth Diseases
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05838365
Dental Implant Failed, Mouth Diseases
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06430268
Dental Implant Failed, Mouth Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details