Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04642235

Nature and Well-Being Project

The investigators pilot test two intervention strategies to increase green space use- place-based and person-based, as well as evaluate the dose-response relationship between green space use and health.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Environmental Exposure Behavior Health Behavior Health, Subjective

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Pennsylvania, Department of Emergency Medicine

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

About this study

Neighborhood conditions can positively impact mental health and wellbeing. Green space has been cited as a potential buffer between inequitable neighborhood conditions and poor health. However, there is limited evidence how to increase exposure to green space and how much exposure is needed to produce benefit. Place-based and person-based interventions offer contrasting approaches to improving the impact of the environment on health. The environment influences people as they traverse the spaces between home, work, and recreation, in ways that can be healthy or harmful. Place-based approaches directly change the environment to encourage healthy behaviors, and potentially have broad population impact. Alternatively, person-based approaches directly target individuals' behavior and may be more feasible. To our knowledge, no studies combine both approaches into a single intervention, which may be more effective over either alone.

The broad objectives of this proposal are to pilot test two intervention strategies to increase green space use- place-based and person-based, as well as evaluate the dose-response relationship between green space use and health. Our place-based intervention, Nature Nooks, builds on our prior greening treatment by adding new features to encourage use - a path and benches to invite people into the space and instillation on large corner lots to maximize visibility. The investigators develop our person-based intervention, Nature Coach, as a novel adoption of an analogous, established patient navigator concept in healthcare.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Live in one of the 8 target neighborhoods identified
  • Have a smartphone
  • Able to understand and respond to an oral interview in English.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unwilling to go outside
  • Not ambulatory

Treatment and study plan

Nature Nook

Other

The Nature Nook intervention will take place on lots that already have the standard greening intervention. In addition, design elements will be added such as a simple path and benches to explicitly invite people into the space. An additional difference is the exclusive use of larger, corner lots, rather than smaller mid-block spaces, to maximize visibility.

Nature Coach

Behavioral

The Nature Coach Intervention consists of 3 components - home visit, text message follow up, and goal feedback.

Home visit. During the 1-hour home visit, the coach will (a) provide education about the health benefits of nature, (b) identify nearby nature targets for the participant to visit, (c) complete a pre-commitment contract based on individualized weekly nature goals, and (d) brainstorm barriers and solutions to reaching the goals.

Personalized weekly text messages. Texts will serve as reminders of goals set with the Nature Coach, as well as encouragement to meet the goals. The context of text messages with change slightly based on individual participants, the goals they set, and the barriers they identify.

Goal feedback- At the end of each week, participants will receive a progression badge via text message that shows the amount of days and time they spent in nature, and how this matched up to the goal set with the Nature Coach.

Nature Nook + Nature Coach

Other

The combined intervention will involve the installation of Nature Nooks to blighted vacant lots followed by the delivery of the Nature Coach intervention to people living in the immediate surrounding blocks. The intervention will be tailored to explicitly direct participants to use the Nature Nook.

Primary outcomes

  1. Green Space Use

    Time frame: 12 months

    This will measured using GPS data to see the amount of time spent in green space.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mental health and well-being: CES-D

    Time frame: 12 months

    This will be measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D scale is a brief 20-item self-report scale designed to measure self-reported symptoms associated with depression experienced in the past week. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time). Scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. A score of 16 points or more is considered depressed.

  2. Mental health and well-being: PSS-10

    Time frame: 12 months

    The Perceived Stress Scale-10(PSS-10) is a self-report instrument consisting of 10 items to assess stress perception, with the time frame being during the last month. Each of the items on the PSS-10 are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = fairly often, 4 = very often). Four positively stated items (item 4, 5, 7, and 8) are reversely scored (0 = very often, 1 = fairy often, 2 = sometimes, 3 = almost never, 4 = never). The sum of the 10 items represents the total score, with higher scores representing higher levels of perceived stress.

  3. Mental health and well-being: WHO-5

    Time frame: 12 months

    The WHO-5 Well-Being Index is a questionnaire that measures current mental well-being, with the time frame being the previous two weeks. This is five items rated on 6-point Likert scale (All of the time, Most of the time, More than half the time, Less than half the time, Some of the time, At no time). The raw score is calculated by totaling the figures of the five answers. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Other

Collaborators

  • American Heart Association
  • OLIN Studio
  • Pennsylvania Horticultural Society
  • United States Forest Service

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Nov 24, 2020
Registry last updated
Sep 1, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.