Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05541653

The IGNITE Study on Concentrated Investment in Black Neighborhoods

Black Americans in the US fare worse across nearly every health indicator compared to White individuals. In Philadelphia, the location of this study, these health disparities culminate in a stark longevity gap, with average life expectancies in poor, predominantly Black neighborhoods being 20 years lower than in nearby affluent, predominantly White neighborhoods. The investigators will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a suite of place-based and financial-wellbeing interventions at the community, organization, and individual/household levels that address the social determinants of racial health disparities. At the community level, the investigators address underinvestment in Black neighborhoods by implementing vacant lot greening, abandoned house remediation, tree planting, and trash cleanup. At the organization level, the investigators partner with community-based financial empowerment providers to develop cross-organizational infrastructure to increase reach and maximize efficiency. At the individual/household levels, the investigators increase access to public benefits, financial counseling and tax preparation services, and emergency cash assistance. The investigators will test this "big push" intervention in 60 Black neighborhood microclusters, with a total of 720 adults. The investigators hypothesize that this "big push" intervention will have significant impact on overall health and wellbeing.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Conditions

Financial Stress Behavior Behavioral Symptoms Economic Problems Environmental Exposure Health Behavior Health, Subjective Mental Health Wellness 1 Stress, Psychological

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Philadelphia Neighborhoods

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 00000, United States

About this study

Black individuals in the United States fare worse than White individuals across almost every social, economic, and health indicator. The Black health disadvantage starts at birth, reflecting the cumulative toll of racialized social stressors and healthcare discrimination on maternal health and resulting in higher rates of preterm birth and low birth weight. Black youth are disproportionately exposed to environmental toxins such as lead and adverse childhood events such as financial hardship and neighborhood violence. Black adults have higher rates of chronic disease, including diabetes, hypertension, as well as many cancers. These and other forces culminate in a stark racial longevity gap: in Philadelphia, the location of this study, life expectancy for people living in a poor, predominantly Black neighborhood is 20 years lower than for people living in a nearby affluent, predominantly White neighborhood.

The fundamental cause of these striking and pervasive disparities is structural racism - the confluence of deep historical, institutional, cultural, and ideological forces that unequally distribute resources and risks across racialized groups. Structural racism patterns health by affecting a range of interconnected, mutually reinforcing social determinants of health at the national, neighborhood, household, and individual levels. Most notably, longstanding, systematic disinvestment has resulted in highly segregated Black neighborhoods with dilapidated environmental conditions and severe economic insecurity within Black households, leading to a "feedback loop of concentrated racial disadvantage," all of which have been strongly tied to poor health.

Most interventions seeking to address racial health disparities focus on individual-level behaviors and outcomes, or individual channels by which structural racism harms health. However, by failing to address upstream social determinants, these interventions have had limited population level impact. A multi-level, multi-component intervention package focused on a range of social determinants of health is necessary to meaningfully address structural racism as a fundamental cause of racial health disparities.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Have the ability to communicate via text messaging
  • Individuals comfortable communicating in English
  • A permanent resident of the home where they are to be enrolled
  • Have knowledge of their household finances

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals who plan to move out of the study microcluster within 6 months
  • Individuals who are unable to fully consent and participate based on recruitment team assessment

Treatment and study plan

Financial Well-being Interventions

Other

Tax preparation; access to public benefits; financial counseling and microgrants

Place-based Interventions

Other

Vacant lot greening; abandoned house remediation; trash cleanup; and tree planting.

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Health Index

    Time frame: 24 months

    Composite index using method of Anderson (2008) based on three questions: rating of overall health (5-pt Likert ranging from poor to excellent); rating of how health has changed in last 6 months (better, same, worse); and number of days in the last 30 where physical or mental health precluded engagement in usual activities (self-care, work, recreation); (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)

  2. Psychological Distress

    Time frame: 24 months

    Kessler-6 (answers scored 0-24 with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychological distress)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall health

    Time frame: 24 months

    Rating of overall health (5-pt Likert ranging from poor to excellent) (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)

  2. Poor health

    Time frame: 24 months

    Whether individual reported either poor or fair health to overall health question (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)

  3. Change in overall health

    Time frame: 24 months

    Rating of how health has changed in last 6 months (better, same, worse)

  4. Healthy days

    Time frame: 24 months

    Number of days in the last 30 where physical or mental health precluded engagement in usual activities (self-care, work, recreation)

  5. Sleep duration

    Time frame: 24 months

    Number of hours of usual sleep (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)

  6. Short sleep

    Time frame: 24 months

    Less than seven hours of usual night sleep (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)

  7. Healthcare access

    Time frame: 24 months

    Received all needed care in the last 6 months (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)

  8. Financial well-being

    Time frame: 24 months

    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Abbreviated Financial Well-being Survey

  9. Food insecurity

    Time frame: 24 months

    Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement Screener

  10. Income tax filing

    Time frame: 24 months

    Whether or not individual (or someone in household on behalf of individual) filed previous years income tax (yes, planning to file late, no) (internally developed)

  11. Home ownership

    Time frame: 24 months

    Whether or not individual owns house, condo, or mobile home (Add Health)

  12. Owing on mortgage

    Time frame: 24 months

    Whether or not individual has remaining mortgage payments (internally developed)

  13. Total debt

    Time frame: 24 months

    Amount of debt added altogether, not including mortgage (Add Health)

  14. Participation in public medical benefit programs

    Time frame: 24 months

    Participation of a household member (including respondent) in Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare savings, LIS, CHIP, Qualified Health Plans, SelectPlan, other, or none (internally developed)

  15. Participation in public food benefit programs

    Time frame: 24 months

    Participation of a household member (including respondent) in SNAP, WIC, Senior Food Box, other, or none (internally developed)

  16. Participation in public income support or cash benefit programs

    Time frame: 24 months

    Participation of a household member (including respondent) in TANF, LIHEAP, SSI/SSDI, UI, PA General Assistance, PA Emergency Rental Assistance, EITC, CTC Refugee Cash Assistance, CCIS, PA Child Care Tax Credit, other, or none (internally developed)

  17. Participation in public home ownership benefit programs

    Time frame: 24 months

    Participation of a household member (including respondent) in PTRR, Homestead Exemption, LOOP, Basic Systems Repair Program, PA Homeowner Assistance, Philly First Home Program, Philadelphia Home Repair Assistance, other or none (internally developed)

  18. Frequency of greenspace engagment

    Time frame: 24 months

    Frequency with which individual visits a greenspace (such as a park, garden, greened vacant lot, trail, or any other outdoor space with vegetation) (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior)

  19. Time spent in greenspace

    Time frame: 24 months

    Time spent in a greenspace on a typical day (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior))

  20. Reasons for not spending time in greenspace

    Time frame: 24 months

    Things that stop an individual from spending time in greenspace (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior)

  21. Perception of tree cover

    Time frame: 24 months

    Beliefs about number of trees in the neighborhood (internally developed)

  22. Tree planting concerns

    Time frame: 24 months

    Whether or not individual has concerns about planting more trees in neighborhood (internally developed)

  23. Perceived tree health benefits

    Time frame: 24 months

    Whether or not individual believes trees confer health benefits (e.g., safety, mental health benefits, physical health benefits, social benefits, environmental benefits, aesthetic benefits)

  24. Perceived stress

    Time frame: 24 months

    Perceived Stress Scale (responses scored 0-16 with higher scores correlated to higher stress)

  25. Time spent in neighborhood

    Time frame: 24 months

    Frequency with which individual endorses spending time relaxing, socializing, or hanging out in porches, stoops, and front yards of neighborhoods (adapted from Kahneman et al 2004 Science)

  26. Neighborhood social capital

    Time frame: 24 months

    Neighborhood Social Cohesion & Exchange and Social & Physical Disorder Scale (two domains: Social Cohesion and Physical Disorder. Higher scores for social cohesion indicate higher levels of social cohesion and higher scores for physical disorder indicate higher levels of physical disorder).

  27. Physical disorder

    Time frame: 24 months

    Whether or not participant reports a lot of abandoned buildings in their neighborhood (Ross and Mirowksi)

  28. Neighborhood crime rates

    Time frame: Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) after intervention period complete

    Overall number of crimes, number of violent crimes, serious crimes, and gun related incidents

  29. Nuisance calls

    Time frame: Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) after intervention period complete

    Number of 311 calls and number of 311 calls for neighborhood cleanup and remediation-related issues

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Concentrated Investment in Black Neighborhoods to Address Structural Racism as a Fundamental Cause of Poor Health

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 15, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 12, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.