Standard of care
OtherRandomized to standard of care with lipid testing only.
NCT Number: NCT04526457
To test the hypothesis that in patients with a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), genetic testing and identification of a causative mutation might enhance the success of family-based cascade screening.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me10 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
To examine the impact of genetic testing on the efficiency of cascade screening for FH, patients with suspected FH or a clinical diagnosis of FH have been randomized to genetic testing or standard of care with lipid testing alone. After systematic encouragement of family enrollment, as a primary endpoint, the compared the number of probands with relatives enrolled in each group one year after results were returned to probands. The secondary endpoints examined include the number of relatives enrolled within 52 weeks of the genetic counseling call and the number of relatives diagnosed with FH through the study. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted stratifying the cohort by randomization/genetic test result. Further exploratory analyses compared probands' perceptions about high cholesterol diagnosis at baseline and at 20 weeks from enrollment
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Randomized to standard of care with lipid testing only.
Randomized to genetic testing.
Time frame: 52 weeks after genetic/lipid testing results are returned to probands
The primary outcome of this study was the number of probands with family members enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the genetic testing group with the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
Time frame: 52 weeks after results are returned to probands
The number of relatives enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of relatives enrolled in the genetic testing group with the number of relatives enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
Time frame: 52 weeks after results are returned to probands
The number of family members diagnosed with FH within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the genetic testing group with the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the usual care group (lipid testing only). This diagnosis had to be made through the study. The number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in each group was expressed as the new case per index case ratio (relatives diagnosed with FH/total number of index case). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame. The diagnosis of FH was based on meeting either genetic or the Make Early Diagnosis To Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED) clinical criteria
Time frame: 20 weeks after enrollment
Proband perceptions about their high cholesterol including its etiology, management and heritability were examined at baseline and 20 weeks after enrollment, using a questionnaire administered at these time points. Investigators examined proband agreement/disagreement with statements about the etiology of their high cholesterol, its management and heritability in these questionnaires. Using this approach, investigators were able to determine the proportion of probands that agreed/disagreed with these statements, and could compare how these proportions differed between the groups of interest at baseline/follow-up and how these changed from baseline to follow-up.
University of Pennsylvania
Other
Acronym: IFIGhTFH
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03110432
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Dyslipidemias
Leipzig, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06231459
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Dyslipidemias
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT04118348
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Dyslipidemias
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01375751
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Dyslipidemias
View Trial Details