Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 500060, China
NCT Number: NCT03164382
This trial was designed to investigate whether the survival outcome, response rate and safety of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil/leucovorin regimens for patients with Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-C stage hepatocellular carcinoma was superior than those of the standard treatment with sorafenib or not.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 500060, China
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide. Advanced-stage disease is found in 25%-70% of HCC at diagnosis, with a median survival time of only 4.2-7.9 months due to limited treatment options. To date, sorafenib is the only standard treatment shown to extend overall survival for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC). However, low response rates, modest survival advantages and high-level heterogeneity of individual response, such limitations of sorafenib prohibit its widespread use in Ad-HCC and more alternative therapies are highly required at present.
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) can provide chemotherapeutic agents to liver at higher concentration with lower toxicity and has been reported favorable results in advanced HCC. However, HAIC provides good but variable outcomes, with a response rate of 7-81% and median survival time of 6-15.9 months. The unstable response may attribute to complicate combinations based on various drugs, including fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin, doxorubicin, mitomycin, leucovorin and interferon. FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-FU/leucovorin) was a regimen first used in colon cancer with liver metastasis and reported to be effective both by systemic and HAIC in amounts of clinical trials. A recent phase II study has shown that HAI of FOLFOX (HAIF) was well tolerated and effective in Ad-HCC. To the investigator's knowledge, no clinical studies have been developed on comparing the survival benefit of HAIF with sorafenib for patients with Ad-HCC. In this phase III trial, the investigators aimed to compare survival outcome, response rate and safety of HAIF with sorafenib in patients with Ad-HCC.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment.
Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential.
Firstly, the femoral artery was percutaneously punctured using the Seldinger technique. Then, the catheter was inserted into the celiac trunk or superior mesenteric artery for arteriography. When more than one feeding artery of HCC was detected, the smaller arteries were embolized with gelatin sponge particles. A micro-catheter was inserted through the arterial catheter located at the common hepatic artery or proper hepatic arterial branch (feeding artery). When blood flows into the gastroduodenal artery was confirmed by micro-catheter angiography, the route was embolized with a coil or micro-coil to prevent reflux of chemotherapeutic drugs to the stomach and duodenum. The peripheral part of the catheter that was exposed to the outside of the body was covered with medical sterile gauze and fastened on the thigh's skin using medical rubberized fabric and bandage. Catheter insertion was repeatedly performed before every cycle of treatment.
Sorafenib will be administered orally at the starting dose of 400 mg twice daily (800 mg total daily dose) to patients randomized to Arm S in accordance to its package insert or equivalent documentation. The 400 mg dose will be achieved by administration of 2 x 200 mg film-coated tablets, administered twice daily.
Time frame: 1 months
Overall survival was the length of time after treatment until death from any cause.
Time frame: 1 months
Time to Progression was defined as the time from commencement of treatment to radiological disease progression.
Time frame: 1 months
Time to Intrahepatic tumor Progression was defined as the time from commencement of treatment to radiological intrahepatic tumor progression.
Sun Yat-sen University
Other
A Phase III Randomized Trial of Comparison of Survival Benefit of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil/Leucovorin With Sorafenib for Patients With Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-C Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02834780
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05128032
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01387555
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04288323
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial Details