Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
NCT Number: NCT02996097
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy immediately followed by intralesional steroid therapy against intralesional steroid therapy alone for the treatment of keloids.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Intralesional corticosteroids remain the gold standard treatment for keloids. However, more effective therapies are desperately desired. Ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment facilitates delivery of intralesional steroid more deeply and uniformly into the skin by creating vertical channels. Recent studies have showed that fractional laser assisted steroid therapy can be effective in the treatment of keloids. However the studies are lacking in comparing this treatment modality to the gold standard of intralesional steroids.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Any subject who is meeting one or more of the following exclusion criteria at the screening visit and/or at the baseline visit will not be included in this study:
CO2 ablative laser plus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide A topical EMLA cream or tetracaine 7%/lidocaine 23% will be applied to the both treatment sites and after sufficient anesthesia is attained, one keloid will be treated with the fractional CO2 laser using standard protocol as practiced in our clinics followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. One lesion would be treated with fractional CO2 ablative laser followed with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at 4 weeks intervals
Time frame: Once every 4 weeks for 16 weeks
Data from POSAS Observer Scale will be collected and reported to assess vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area of the keloids chosen for the research study. Total score range: 6-60; Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Mean composite score of the final visit was compared to the mean baseline score.
Time frame: Once every 4 weeks for 16 weeks
Data from POSAS Observer Scale will be collected and reported to assess vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area of the keloids chosen for the research study. Total score range: 6-60; Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Mean composite score of the final visit was compared to the mean baseline score.
Johns Hopkins University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07673484
Allergic Contact Dermatitis, Cicatrix
Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07420166
Cicatrix, Collagen Diseases
Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07263100
Cicatrix, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
Sattahip, Changwat Chon Buri, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT05330078
Cicatrix, Collagen Diseases
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial Details