Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00222430

Fluoroscopy Guided Femoral Arterial Access

The purpose of this study is to compare the use of fluoroscopic guidance, (a commonly used X-ray technique), with the traditional approach, (where the doctors feel for the strongest pulse), to obtain access to the blood vessel in the groin. These two methods are being compared to assess which is faster, safer and more often allows your physician to use an "arterial closure device," a small suture or plug applied at the end of the angiogram where the needle enters your blood vessel if he/she chooses.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Oklahoma Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to study the effectiveness of applying fluoroscopy guided femoral artery access in the cardiac catheterization lab and its effect on the usage of FDA approved femoral artery closure devices. This trial will randomize patients between fluoroscopy guided femoral artery access or femoral artery access using the usual anatomic landmarks and will then study the difference in the ability to use closure devices on the access site.

Purpose: To establish the safety and efficacy of using fluoroscopic assistance to allow access of the common femoral artery rather than its branches and thus increase the ability to use closure devices.

Enrollment: An approximate enrollment of up to 1000 patients (all patients randomized) who will be undergoing cardiac catheterization and who meet all the eligibility criteria at OUMC and VAMC in Oklahoma City.

Duration: The study will be conducted over approximately one year.

Primary Endpoint: Prediction of ability to use femoral artery closure device based on angiographic data of the femoral artery from fluoroscopy arm versus traditional technique arm.

Secondary Endpoints:

  • Compare the incidence of known major side effects of femoral artery puncture between the two methods of access
  • Compare the time and number of attempts needed to obtain arterial access between the two groups of patients.
  • Compare the ability to puncture the common femoral artery using fluoroscopy vs. anatomical landmarks among different levels of trainees (cardiology fellows) and attending cardiologists.
  • Assess whether fluoroscopic guidance is a superior method to obtain access and thus should be used as a training technique for cardiology fellows.

Analytical Subset: Intention-to-treat sample

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 and over.
  • Patients undergoing elective or urgent left heart cath from the femoral approach.
  • Willingness to participate and sign the consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Access from site other than the common femoral artery.
  • Creatinine >= 3.0mg/dl.
  • Graft in the common femoral artery or other surgeries at that site that might have changed the anatomy of the groin.
  • Unable or refusal to sign a consent form.
  • Patients from the Department of Corrections.
  • Pregnant Women
  • Undetectable femoral artery pulse.
  • Patients undergoing emergent cardiac catheterization for ST elevation MI or unstable ACS.

Treatment and study plan

Fluoroscopy

Procedure

Use of fluoroscopy during arterial insertion of coronary catheter

Active Comparator

Procedure

Standard coronary angiography technique; no fluoroscopic assistance

Primary outcomes

  1. Prediction of ability to use femoral artery closure device based on angiographic data of the femoral artery from fluoroscopy arm versus traditional technique arm.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compare the incidence of known major side effects of femoral artery puncture between the two methods of access

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Compare the time and number of attempts needed to obtain arterial access between the two groups of patients.

    Time frame: Intraprocedural

  3. Compare the ability to puncture the common femoral artery using fluoroscopy vs. anatomical landmarks among different levels of trainees (cardiology fellows) and attending cardiologists.

    Time frame: Intraprocedural

  4. Assess whether fluoroscopic guidance is a superior method to obtain access and thus should be used as a training technique for cardiology fellows.

    Time frame: End of study analysis

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Fluoroscopy Guided Femoral Arterial Access and the Use of Closure Devices: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2006
First posted
Sep 22, 2005
Registry last updated
Mar 28, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.