Chest Diseases Department, Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine
Alexandria, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05702580
The goal of this study is to compare the microbiologic diagnostic yield of pre-aspiration agitated pleural fluid versus that of conventionally aspirated fluid in pleural infection patients. The main question it aims to answer is, whether fluid agitation helps to increase the microbiological yield.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alexandria, Egypt
In pleural infection, It is suggested that the bacteria being diagnostically targeted, might more likely be residing on the pleural surface with a better blood supply and nutrition rather than being planktonic in the acidic, glucose deficient pleural fluid. The investigators thus hypothesize that an agitation of the pleural fluid prior to sample aspiration would aid in achieving a better cellular representation of the pleural space. This could have the effect of washing bacterial cells off the pleural surface as well as moving sedimented cells in the aspirated sample. This study aims to investigate whether an increase in the microbiological yield for infected pleural fluid could be achieved by a pre-aspiration agitation of the pleural fluid which would have a positive effect on management and eventual patient outcomes. Adult participants with pleural infection will undergo thoracentesis via both the standard and agitated fluid techniques guided by thoracic ultrasound. Microbiological yields will be compared.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Using a 16-18 gauge cannula, a standard thoracentesis will be performed then a sample of pleural fluid will be aspirated and rapidly flushed into the pleural space and redrawn again for a few cycles before a sample is finally drawn into the collection syringe
Time frame: results within 1 week of sampling
Percentage of samples with a positive microbiologic result among both aspiration techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Difference in LDH levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Difference in glucose levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Difference in protein levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Difference in neutrophilic count in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Difference in lymphocytic count in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Alexandria University
Other
Pleural Fluid Agitation For Improving The Microbiologic Diagnostic Yield In Pleural Infection - A Comparative Feasibility Study
Acronym: FLAG-PINS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07713329
Empyema, Empyema, Pleural
Gamasa, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05903417
Pleural Infection
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial DetailsNCT04350502
Amoxicillin, Community-Acquired Infections
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06513689
Empyema, Empyema, Pleural
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details