Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06513689

The Oxford Pleural Infection Endotyping Study

Pleural infection is a severe disease with increasing incidence worldwide. The subphenotypes of pleural infection remain unknown.We designed a study to endotype the disease and assess the association between patient phenotype, microbiology and clinical outcome.

We subjected 80 pleural fluid samples to unlabelled mass spectrometry.

Pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins identified the neutrophil degranulation, glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, and the liver and retinoid X receptors (LXR-RXR) activation. Higher neutrophil degranulation was associated with increased glycolysis and pentose phosphate activation.

Pleural infection patients exhibit proteomic signatures indicating diverse responses of neutrophil mediated immunity, glycolysis, and pentose phosphate activation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Laboratory of Pleural Translational Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford

Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7FZ, United Kingdom

About this study

Pleural infection is a common and severe disease with increasing incidence worldwide. The endotypes of pleural infection remain unknown. A better understanding of patient variation in underlying biological response to infection may lead to improved treatments and clinical outcomes. We designed a study with the aim to endotype the disease and assess the association between patient phenotype, microbiology and clinical outcome.

We subjected 80 pleural fluid samples from the PILOT study, a prospective study on pleural infection, to unlabelled mass spectrometry. Proteins were retained if they were detected in at least 50% of the samples resulting in a total of 449 proteins. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and UMAP analyses were used to cluster samples, Spearman and exact Fischer's methods were used for correlation assessment and protein expression was correlated with clinical outcomes.

UMAP plotting separated the samples in to two different and distinct cohorts. Pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins identified neutrophil degranulation, glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, and the liver and retinoid X receptors (LXR-RXR) activation. Higher neutrophil degranulation was associated with increased glycolysis and pentose phosphate activation. Specimens dominated by Streptococcus Pneumoniae exhibited high neutrophil degranulation. Increased activity of the LXR-RXR pathway was associated with better survival.

Pleural infection patients exhibit proteomic signatures indicating diverse responses of neutrophil mediated immunity, glycolysis, and pentose phosphate activation which were associated with microbiology. Therapeutic targeting the LXR-XRX pathway with agonists may improve survival.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Samples collected for the PILOT clinical trial (DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00130-2020) used for the TORPIDS-2 study.

Patients were included if they had a clinical presentation consistent with pleural infection and any of the following criteria: 1. pleural fluid that was macroscopically purulent; or 2. pleural fluid that was positive on culture for bacterial infection; or 3. pleural fluid that demonstrated bacteria on Gram staining; or 4. pleural fluid with a pH ≤7.2 (measured by blood gas analyser) or low glucose level (≤3 mmol·L-1 or ≤55 mg·dL-1) in a patient with clinical evidence of infection; or 5. contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) evidence of pleural infection (consolidation of underlying lung with enhancing pleural collection) in a patient with clinical evidence of infection, alongside exclusion of other sources of infection. Evidence of infection was assessed by the recruiting physician on the basis of fever, an elevated peripheral blood white-cell count, or elevated serum inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP). Study exclusion criteria were as follows: 1. age <18 years; 2. no pleural fluid available for analysis; 3. previous pneumonectomy on the side of pleural infection; and 4. expected survival of <3 months due to co-morbid disease, as judged by the recruiting physician.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Pleural infection endotypes

    Time frame: 12 months

    Discovery of pleural infection biological endotypes

  2. Association between endotypes and microbiology

    Time frame: 12 months

    Investigate the association between pleural infection endotypes and microbiology

  3. Association between endotypes and one-year survival

    Time frame: 12 months

    Investigate the association between pleural infection endotypes and one-year survival

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association between endotypes and need for surgical treatment

    Time frame: 12 months

    Investigate the association between pleural infection endotypes and need for surgical treatment

  2. Association between levels of pleural fluid plasminogen and neutrophil elastase

    Time frame: 12 months

    Investigate the association between pleural fluid plasminogen and neutrophil elastase protein levels

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pleural Fluid Proteomics From Patients With Pleural Infection Shows Signatures of Diverse Neutrophilic Responses: The Oxford Pleural Infection Endotyping Study (TORPIDS 2)

Acronym: TORPIDS-2

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 22, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.