Delta university for science and technology
Gamasa, 1234, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07713329
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological efficacy of chemical pleural adhesiolysis (using either intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide or intrapleural corticosteroids) versus mechanical pleural adhesiolysis (via medical thoracoscopy) in patients with non-malignant, complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE).
Complicated pleural effusions often lead to the formation of fibrinous septa and adhesions, which impair drainage and prevent lung re-expansion. Standard interventions like tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DNase can be costly and limited in resource-constrained settings, while thoracoscopic mechanical pleurolysis requires specialized expertise and equipment.
The investigators aim to evaluate whether chemical adhesiolysis using accessible, cost-effective agents (hydrogen peroxide or steroids) can offer a comparable and reliable alternative to thoracoscopic mechanical disruption of septa. Efficacy will be assessed using a novel composite clinical and radiological efficiency score evaluated seven days post-procedure.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–62 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Gamasa, 1234, Egypt
This is a parallel-group, open-label, single-blinded (radiological and ultrasonographic assessors), pilot randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at the Chest Medicine Department, Mansoura University Hospital.
A total of 36 eligible adult patients (aged 18-62 years) presenting with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion requiring pleurolytic intervention will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into one of three treatment arms (12 patients per arm):
Clamping, positional rotation, and dosing intervals (two sessions 24 hours apart) will be identical to Group A.
● Group C (Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis): Patients will undergo medical thoracoscopy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. This involves direct visual exploration of the pleural cavity, mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa/adhesions, evacuation of loculated fluid, and subsequent placement of an intercostal drain.
Assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 7 days post-procedure to evaluate treatment response:
The primary outcome will be evaluated using a 0-6 point composite clinical/radiological efficiency score at day 7, combining lung volumetric improvement, diaphragmatic excursion, pleural thickness reduction, drained fluid volume, and resolution of effusion complexity. Patients who fail chemical pleurolysis (Group A or B) will be offered crossover to mechanical pleurolysis as a rescue intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Diluted pharmaceutical-grade 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. A total volume of 250-300 mL is instilled via an intercostal chest tube (accounting for tube dead space to deliver approximately 250 mL directly into the pleural cavity). Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.
Administered via an existing intercostal drain. Corticosteroid agent used is either Dexamethasone 8 mg or Triamcinolone acetonide 0.3-0.6 mg/kg (approximately 80 mg), diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 250-300 mL. Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.
Performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Involves medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions, evacuation of loculations, and placement of an intercostal drain.
Time frame: 7 days post-intervention
Treatment efficiency is evaluated using a study-defined composite clinical/radiological score ranging from 0 to 6. The score integrates 5 domains: (1) Lung volumetric improvement, (2) Diaphragmatic excursion improvement, (3) Pleural thickness reduction, and (4) Drained pleural fluid volume. For these first four domains, a percentage change/improvement from baseline equals or more than 30% is assigned 1 point, while a change < 30% is assigned 0 points. The 5th domain is Effusion complexity, scored sonographically as: septated = 0, complex = 1, and simple = 2. Higher total scores indicate a greater pleurolytic response, with treatment success classified as a total score equals or more than 5.
Delta University for Science and Technology
Other
Liberation of Captive Pleura: Chemical Pleural Adhesiolysis Versus Mechanical Pleural Adhesiolysis in Stacked Pleural Effusion
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06513689
Empyema, Empyema, Pleural
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07625176
Pleural Diseases, Pleural Effusion
Aalborg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06427538
Empyema, Empyema, Pleural
Sterling Heights, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07077096
Empyema, Infections
Hong Kong
View Trial Details