Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04582149

Eye-Control Trial: Wearable Eye-Tracking Device as Means of Communication

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of use of a wearable communication device for critically ill patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanically ventilated. The study will assess the safety, tolerability, and ease of use of the EyeControl device, and examine its potential monitoring capabilities.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

About this study

Critically ill patients, who are mechanically ventilated, suffer not only from their acute, potentially devastating illness, but also from the lack of ability to communicate in an effective manner. This is the direct result of the orotracheal tube or tracheostomy required for the mechanical ventilation, which does not allow speech to be produced. On top of the mechanical change in air flow, communication challenges result from sedation, neurological injuries (primary brain injury or secondary encephalopathy), and delirium.

Lack of communication can lead to increased frustration, anxiety, and overall psychological stress and could continue to the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On top of the subjective discomfort, the inability to communicate in an effective manner may impair medical care-for example, by failure to assess symptoms such as pain or breathing discomfort by behavioral cues only.

Currently, the solutions for communication deficits in mechanically ventilated patients are mainly using yes/no communication, attempting to write, and communication boards that allow people to point at defined pictures or letters. Recently, technological advancements led to incorporation of more sophisticated communication devices, proving the feasibility of an eye-tracking approach, for example.

The EyeControl is a new, wearable, eye-tracking device that facilitates communication by means of internal feedback to the patients with a bone-conducting speaker. In this way, the device can ask the patient what he or she wants to say, and the patient replies by eye gestures such as blinking or moving the eyes in a certain direction. This approach eliminates the need for calibration, as most eye-tracking devices that use a screen require, and is relatively easy to operate.

This study will assess the safety, tolerability, and ease of use of the EyeControl device.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission
  • Mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours
  • Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) between -1 to 1 at the time of screening
  • Ability to follow simple commands

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to follow commands during screening (at a minimum: open and close eyes, move eyes to one side or the other)
  • Known cerebral injury (acute or chronic) in the dominant hemisphere concerning for aphasia on clinical assessment
  • Significant pre-existing neurologic (i.e., dementia and/or cognitive deficiencies), psychiatric, or baseline communication challenges that would confound outcomes assessments
  • Inability to blink or move eyes for any reason
  • Prisoner or incarceration
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • Unwillingness to be contacted for follow-up

Treatment and study plan

EyeControl Eye-tracking Device

Device

The EyeControl is a new, wearable, eye-tracking device that facilitates communication by means of internal feedback to the patients with a bone-conducting speaker. In this way, the device can ask the patient what he or she wants to say, and the patient replies by eye gestures such as blinking or moving the eyes in a certain direction. Once the patient is able to operate the device, it will stay on the patient for as long as she or he would like it on, or until the patient is successfully extubated or discharged from the ICU, whichever is earliest.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Succeeded in Operating the EyeControl Device

    Time frame: Up to Day 3

    Successful operation of the device was defined as completing a set of assignments termed as a proficiency test. This proficiency test included the ability to call for help and the ability to choose a correct answer out of multiple choice questions that were read to the patient using the device. Participants were able to try to learn to operate the device once per day for up to three days.

  2. Time To Successful Operation of the EyeControl Device

    Time frame: Up to Day 3

    Successful operation of the device was defined as completing a set of assignments termed as a proficiency test. This proficiency test included the ability to call for help and the ability to choose a correct answer out of multiple choice questions that were read to the patient using the device. Participants were able to try to learn to operate the device once per day for up to three days. The time (in minutes) of training required for a patient to successfully operate the device was documented.

  3. Number of Participants Successfully Operating the EyeControl Device Per Attempt Day

    Time frame: Up to Day 3

    Successful operation of the device was defined as completing a set of assignments termed as a proficiency test. This proficiency test included the ability to call for help and the ability to choose a correct answer out of multiple choice questions that were read to the patient using the device. Participants were able to try to learn to operate the device once per day for up to three days. The study day when participants passed the proficiency test was documented.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Days of Use

    Time frame: Up to end of study participation (up to 3 days)

    The duration of EyeControl device use and participation in the trial was recorded in days (participation in the trial ended when use of the device ended). Participants left the trial due to inability to operate the device, patient request, technical issues, and no longer needing the device (extubation, ICU discharge).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Emory University

Other

Collaborators

  • Eyefree Assisting Communication Ltd

Registry information

Official study title

Wearable Eye-Tracking Device as Means of Communication in the Critically Ill and Mechanically Ventilated Patient

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 9, 2020
Registry last updated
Sep 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.