Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine Queen's University Belfast
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT06027866
Patients in acute and critical care often undergo a tracheostomy. A tracheostomy is an incision at the front of the neck to insert a breathing tube directly into the airway. The tube sits in place in the airway using an inflated air-filled cuff. This means that no airflow is directed up and out past the vocal cords through the voice box, and speech is not possible. Being unable to speak can cause distress to patients and may place them at an increased risk of harm if they are unable to express their wishes or needs. It can also increase stress for relatives and healthcare staff as they try to understand what patients are trying to say. Usually when patients cannot talk, staff use different items to help, like a pen and paper. A new communication device that runs on a smartphone or tablet has recently been developed. It is for patients with tracheostomies and works by reading lip movements and translating them into words on the device screen.
The aim of this study is to find out if providing adult acute and critical care patients who have a tracheostomy with the use of this lip-reading device could improve how they communicate. This study will include:
1. Using the lip-reading device in acute and critical care to test if it helps patients with tracheostomies to communicate better. 2. Interviews with patients, relatives and focus groups/interviews with staff to find out their views on communication including the use of the new lipreading device. 3. Follow-up with patients approximately 3-months after acute/critical care discharge to complete some further questions about their physical and mental health.
The study will take place in three critical care units and one acute care unit in Northern Ireland and is expected to last 18 months. The study has been funded by the Public Health Agency Research and Development Division.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, United Kingdom
Study Design: This is a mixed-method, multi-centre prospective observational cohort study to establish the feasibility of SRAVI. Mixed methods include:
Sample size: The investigators aim to recruit a minimum target of 55 patients. For every patient recruited, the investigators anticipate that three qualitative interviews will be undertaken (i.e., with the patient, their significant other, and at least one healthcare professional). Therefore, a feasible target recruitment is 165 participants.
Consent: Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or a personal or professional consultee in accordance with ethical approval.
Data collection: Data will be collected by the investigators and recorded in the study case report form (CRF).
Baseline data
Daily data collected
Feasibility and clinical outcome data collected in acute/critical care
Data collected after critical care discharge
Data collected during virtual/telephone/in-person follow-up 3 months following acute/critical care discharge:
Data analysis: Descriptive analysis will be used to analyse data from the observational cohort study. Numbers of patients screened, eligible, recruited, consented, and withdrawn from the study will be reported. Baseline demographic and clinical data will be summarised for study participants. Continuous variables will be summarised as mean (standard deviation) and median (interquartile range) and categorical variables will be summarised as number (percent).
Qualitative interviews/focus groups: Interviews/focus groups will be conducted by the investigator. Interview schedules/focus group topic guides will be developed from discussions within the research team, the patient advisory group, and from literature around study participation. The schedules will include a pre-defined list of questions that will be informed by the objectives of the study. The schedule will enable all participants to be asked similar questions and thus permit comparison of themes across each subject during data analysis.
Qualitative data collection: Interviews/focus groups will be audio recorded and professionally transcribed verbatim using an authorised transcription service. All identifying information will be removed prior to analysis. Transcriptions will be reviewed and verified prior to analysis by the research fellow by comparing the audio and written versions to identify errors.
Qualitative analysis: Qualitative data will be subjected to a thematic analysis, using Newell and Burnard's framework. This approach will permit an inductive process of drawing out important data-driven themes and a deductive process relating the major themes that emerge to the pre-defined objectives of the research. A process of constant comparison, reading, and re-reading of the data will enable identification of emerging themes. The process will be facilitated by using a computer-assisted qualitative data software package, NVIVO.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-Patient declined consent
Speech Recognition Application for the Voice Impaired (SRAVI) is a novel communication aid developed by Liopa (a company formed by Queen's University Belfast (QUB) and the Centre for Security Information Technologies (CSIT), QUB). SRAVI is an application-based lip-reading system, and the application ('app') can be downloaded onto any device with a standard forward facing camera (e.g., smartphone, tablet). When the device is held in front of a patient, it will track lip movement and identify phrases being mouthed.
Time frame: From date of study enrolment until SRAVI no longer required by participant (due to return of natural voice) whilst in the study site or participant has been discharged from study site, an average of 8 weeks.
Time frame: From study enrolment until SRAVI no longer required by participant (due to return of natural voice) whilst in study site or participant has been discharged from study site, an average of 8 weeks.
Time frame: From critical care admission to critical care discharge, censored at 8-weeks
Total number of days patient spent in critical care
Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, censored at 3-months
Total number of days patient spent in hospital
Time frame: Assessed twice per shift using the validated delirium screening tool used in each unit from date of study enrolment until SRAVI no longer used or discharge from critical care. Censored at 8-weeks
Did participants have delirium during their critical care stay?
Time frame: Three months following acute/critical care discharge
Measured by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQoL-5D) a generic health-related quality of life questionnaire. Respondents describe their current health state in five dimensions: mobility, ability to self-care, ability to undertake usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (score of 1), slight problems (score of 2), moderate problems (score of 3), severe problems (score of 4) and extreme problems (score of 5). The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The questionnaire also features a visual analogue scale ranging from 'best imaginable health state' (score of 100) to 'worst imaginable health state' (score of 0).
Time frame: Three months following acute/critical care discharge
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. The anxiety and depression subscales each range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety/depression. Patients were defined as having anxiety or depression or both if the score was 8 or more in the corresponding subscales.
Time frame: Three months following acute/critical care discharge
The Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R) measures severity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ('not at all') to 4 ('extremely'). The IES-R yields a total score (ranging from 0 to 88); higher scores mean worse symptoms.
Time frame: Three months following acute/critical care discharge
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment-BLIND (MoCA-BLIND) is a test used to detect cognitive decline. The MoCA-BLIND test examines seven domains (executive/visuospatial function, naming, attention, language, abstraction, recall and orientation) of cognitive function with a total of 11 questions with a maximum score of 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal. A score of less than 26 indicates cognitive impairment (worse outcome). Minimum score is 0.
Queen's University, Belfast
Other
A Mixed Method Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Test Speech Recognition Application for the Voice Impaired (SRAVI) as a Communication Aid for Acute and Critical Care Patients With Tracheostomies.
Acronym: SRAVI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05343442
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03955874
Critical Illness, Direct Extubation
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03940118
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07737353
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Giresun, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details