The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
NCT Number: NCT03749330
This study aims to improve communication between medical teams, patients, and families in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. The researchers hypothesize that both improving interprofessional teamwork when preparing for family meeting and preparing families for these meetings will improve team and family satisfaction with communication. The study will involve bringing together a group of medical professionals and parents of patients to collaboratively design an intervention. In addition, the researchers will study feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and whether it impacts family and team outcomes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
Context:
A large proportion of children with advanced heart disease (AHD) die in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), where parents describe obtaining a realistic understanding that their child had a life-limiting disease only 2 days prior to death. Delayed or inadequate communication within teams or with families may contribute to this lack of understanding (as shown in children with other serious illnesses), while interactions with pediatric palliative care specialists (PPCS) have been shown to improve communication and understanding of prognosis. The limited number of PPCS, however, means that all clinicians in the CICU must have the skills to support parental decision-making, including giving bad news and eliciting parental goals for their child.
Objectives:
Study Design:
Prospective cohort study with pre and post assessments around an intervention.
Setting/Participants:
Clinicians at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and parents of children previously hospitalized in the ICU will be invited to participate in the co-design portion of the study to develop the team and family based intervention. A separate group of volunteer attending intensivists, cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, front line clinicians, bedside nurses, and social workers from the pediatric CICU at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) will undergo the intervention and participate in observed family meetings before and after the intervention. Other clinicians who are participating in an observed family meeting will also be enrolled. Parents or legal guardians and their children in the CICU who have been there for at least 7 days and are expected to stay at least another 7 days will also be consented and enrolled.
Study Interventions and Measures:
Intervention:
The intervention includes both an interprofessional team training that will include practice in communication skills of giving bad news and building team collaboration and a family oriented intervention to prepare them for family meetings.
Measures:
The Co-design process to develop the intervention will have focus groups to evaluate the interventions' content and perceived feasibility.
The impact of the intervention on CICU clinicians' perceived usefulness and satisfaction with the training will be measured with post-intervention survey and follow-up interviews.
For the actual family meetings, assessment of the impact of the intervention on communication and team function in actual family meetings pre and post-intervention will be done by coding audio recordings with validated tools and qualitative coding of content. Collaboration will be measured using the amount of time different members of different disciplines speak, and team member perception and satisfaction with collaboration will be measured using a validated tool. Fidelity of the intervention implementation will be measured by documenting behaviors of clinicians post-intervention in meetings and in chart documentation.
Parents' experiences in family meetings and perspectives on communication with the clinical team will be measured with a pre-intervention survey measuring parental mood, affect, and satisfaction with communication or with semi-structured interview. Parental perception of the CST will be measured in post-intervention surveys and acceptability interviews.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants in Co-design:
Clinicians Participating in Intervention:
Clinicians Not Participating in Intervention:
Parent-patient Dyads Participating in the Survey or Interview:
Exclusion criteria
Participants in Co-design:
Clinicians Participating in Intervention:
Clinicians Not Participating in Intervention:
Parent-patient Dyads Participating in the Survey or Interview:
When the necessary pre-intervention clinical encounters are completed, clinicians will go through the interprofessional team training to improve communication skills and teamwork in developing care plans and communicating with families in family meetings. The first step in the study is co-design of the intervention, so it will evolve as the study continues.
Time frame: 5 months
Acceptability of the study will be evaluated with 1 item from the Satisfaction with and Impact of the Course survey. The item is whether the training would be recommended to colleagues scored using a 4-point Likert scale (1=strongly agree to 4=strongly disagree), therefore a lower score indicates more acceptability.
Time frame: 3.5 years
Retention rates will be tracked over time by comparing numbers of enrolled/retained subjects to numbers of those who decline to enroll or disenroll
Time frame: 3.5 years
Consent rates will be tracked over time by comparing numbers of consenting subjects to numbers of subjects who do not consent to participate
Time frame: 3.5 years
Percent of missing data from parent and CICU team member reported survey data will be tracked throughout the study. All participants should have had data collected, therefore denominator is number of participants and the numerator is the number of participants that we received survey data from.
Time frame: 3.5 years
Meetings will be audio-recorded and the length of each meeting measured automatically as part of analysis with NVivo qualitative coding software
Time frame: 2 years
Parent participant perception of acceptability of the amount of information included in the intervention will be assessed with the amount of information item from the Patient Ratings of Shared Decision Making Program scale. Response options range from 1-3 on a 3-point Likert scale (1=less than wanted, about right, 3=more than wanted).
Time frame: 2 years
Parent participant perception of clarity of intervention materials will be assessed with the clarity item from the Patient Ratings of Shared Decision Making Program scale. Response options range from 1-3 on a 3-point Likert scale (1=everything clear, most things clear, 3=some/many things unclear).
Time frame: 2 years
Overall parent participant perception of the intervention will be assessed with the summary rating of intervention item from the Patient Ratings of Shared Decision Making Program scale. Response options range from 1-5 on a 5-point Likert scale (1=very positive, generally positive, neutral, somewhat positive, 5=very negative).
Time frame: 2 years
For the 30 family meetings which were intended to receive the intervention (CST) we will assess the percent of those meetings which met the threshold of adhering to the intervention protocol. The denominator is the total number of observed MEETINGS in the post-intervention phase and the numerator is the number of meeting that meet the adherence threshold.
Time frame: 2 years
Percent of Team interactions post-intervention will be monitored to assess the adherence to the intervention schedule and protocol.
Time frame: 2 years
Were we able to enroll clinicians in the intervention portion of the study and parents in the study and to what extent were they retained throughout the duration of the study.
Time frame: 2 years
A proportion of empathic terminator statements provided by a clinician after a parental expression of negative emotion will be calculated pre and post intervention. The denominator of the proportion will be all the expressions of negative emotion by a parent and the numerator will be the instances in which a clinician responds without a statement of empathy. Because there will be a proportion calculated for all 58 meetings, we will then calculate the median proportion pre-intervention and post-intervention with an interquartile range. Empathic terminators are not desirable and therefore a lower proportion is considered a better outcome.
Time frame: 2 years
Team function communication will be measured by changes in the Performance Assessment for Communication and Teamwork Toolset - Novice (PACT-Novice) scores. The PACT-Novice communication item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1-poor, 3=average, 5-excellent). Higher scores are better. We analyzed the median (IQR) differences in pre-intervention vs. Post-intervention PACT novice item "communication" scores using wilcoxon rank sum tests.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04181294
Behavior, Communication
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04179305
Behavior, Communication
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04158908
Behavior, Communication
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01933789
Advance Care Planning, Anxiety Disorders
Renton, Washington, United States
View Trial Details