Binghamton University
Binghamton, New York, 13902, United States
NCT Number: NCT07086508
Underage drinking is a significant problem in the United States. While past research supports the efficacy of interventions in delaying the initiation of alcohol use implemented in middle school and early high school, research shows drinking by older high schoolers is problematic and interventions for older high schoolers remain limited. The current project will test the efficacy of the e-CHECKUP TO GO (eCTG), alone and combined with an electronic-Parent-Based Intervention (ePBI), for junior and senior high school students using a nationally representative sample with the goal of reducing alcohol use and negative consequences.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
15 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Binghamton, New York, 13902, United States
Prevalence rates of high school alcohol use suggest 61.6% of high school students have used alcohol by their senior year and 1 in 3 students report alcohol use past 30-days. High school risky drinking is associated with negative consequences including impaired neurocognitive functioning, academic problems, hangovers, passing out, unwanted sex, dating violence, suicide attempts, illicit drug use, riding with impaired drivers, and impaired driving.
While past research supports the efficacy of interventions in delaying the initiation of alcohol use implemented in middle school and early high school, research shows drinking by older high schoolers is problematic and interventions for older high schoolers remain limited. Implementation with high schoolers has always been difficult to sustain following the completion of the grant funding period due to large costs associated with personnel to hire, train, and supervise teachers and staff to implement interventions with fidelity. As an alternative, brief web-based personalized feedback interventions that do not require staffing or costs to implement to large numbers of students have shown promise (e.g., eCHECKUP TO GO; eCTG). Our preliminary work, including our funded NIAAA R21 study, supporting this proposal has shown eCTG is efficacious in changing normative perceptions of peer drinking frequency and drunkenness, positive alcohol expectancies, and reducing both alcohol use and consequences among high school students. The proposed research will expand on these findings by conducting a randomized controlled trial using the eCHECKUP TO GO (eCTG) alone and combined with an efficacious brief electronic-Parent-Based Intervention on a nationally representative sample of high school juniors and seniors.
The design is a four-arm RCT: eCTG, eCTG+, Parent-Only, and Control. Data collection will occur across 5 waves (pre-intervention baseline, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- month follow-ups) for all arms. In all arms there is one wave for parents (3-month only).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A brief, web-based program designed by San Diego State University to reduce high-risk drinking by providing personalized normative feedback regarding alcohol use, risk factors, and risks associated with drinking and accurate information about alcohol.
The e-Parent Intervention, which is an electronic handbook developed by Rob Turrisi to guide parents in discussing drinking, behaviors, and consequences with their teens.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
A standard drink definition will be provided, indicating that a standard drink consists of 12 oz. of beer or wine cooler, 8.5 oz. of malt liquor, 4 oz. of wine, or 1.5 oz. of hard liquor. Using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ), participants will indicate how many drinks they consumed on each day of a typical week during the past month. Participants will also be asked peak drinks and hours spent drinking during the occasion they drank the most during the past month.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Alcohol-related consequences (e.g., said or done embarrassing things, blackout) from the past three months will be measured using the established Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ). Response options will be measured on a 7-point scale ranging from (0) no, not in the past year to (6) 11 or more times in the past three months.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Parental permissiveness of underage drinking will be assessed using six items (e.g., I am allowed to drink alcohol on special occasions), based on level of agreement on a 7-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Parental communication about alcohol use will be assessed separately for mothers and fathers. Participants will be asked whether their parent discussed these topics (yes/no) with them within the past three months. Items include topics such as "the importance of not being pressured to drink to fit it".
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
General Communication (e.g., my mother/father is there for me when I want to talk) will be assessed separately for mothers and fathers based on level of agreement on a 7-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
General Parenting Practices (e.g., if I had a personal problem I could ask my mother/father for help) will be assessed separately for mothers and fathers based on level of agreement on a 7-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Parental monitoring (e.g., my mother/father tries to know about my drinking) will be assessed separately for mothers and fathers based on level of agreement on a 7-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Expectancies for using alcohol (e.g., I will feel badly about myself because of my drinking) will be measured. Responses will be recorded using 7-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Perceived peer descriptive norms of drinking will be measured using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ) by assessing how much alcohol, on average, participants' closest friends drink each day of the week.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Perceived peer injunctive norms will be measured by indicating the level of approval participants' closest friends would have from a list of items (e.g., drinking alcohol every weekend) on a 7-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disapprove to (7) strongly approve.
Binghamton University
Other
A Randomized Clinical Trial: Examining the Efficacy of eCHECKUP TO GO Combined With a Brief Parent-based Intervention to Reduce High School Student Drinking
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05345951
Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03506880
Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06871982
Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04356261
Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details