Loyola Marymount University
Los Angeles, California, 90045, United States
NCT Number: NCT04356261
Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF), the most widely-used college alcohol intervention approach, suffers from several limitations innovatively remedied in the current proposal through CampusGANDR, a smartphone-based app for college students that delivers alcohol-related PNF within a weekly game centered around testing first-year students' perceptions about the attitudes and behaviors of their peers in a variety of campus-relevant domains. Five pilot studies suggest that CampusGANDR will be significantly more effective at correcting students' normative misperceptions and reducing their alcohol use than standard PNF, especially among heavier-drinking students and those with greater exposure to alcohol on social media, and that these larger effects are driven by the significantly decreased psychological reactance experienced by students when viewing feedback as part of a game about college life rather than as part of an alcohol-focused program. The current project seeks to 1) evaluate the efficacy of CampusGANDR in a large-scale multi-site trial, 2) identify the optimal dosage of alcohol feedback to deliver within CampusGANDR for correcting norms and reducing alcohol use across 12 weeks of gameplay among non-drinking, moderate-drinking, and heavy-drinking students, 3) examine person-level moderators of these effects, and 4) evaluate CampusGANDR engagement and sustainability among students who play voluntarily but are not involved in the randomized controlled trial.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–20 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Los Angeles, California, 90045, United States
Despite concerted efforts, high risk drinking remains a significant problem on college campuses. Further, the transition into college is an identified critical period in which risky drinking patterns are often established and serious negative consequences occur. Colleges commonly employ Normative Re-Education (NR), a promising intervention approach focused on correcting over-estimated peer drinking norms, to reduce alcohol risk in first-year students. However, the most cost-effective and scalable NR intervention strategy, web-based personalized normative feedback (PNF), has yielded only modest reductions in drinking. Several issues have been identified that may explain these relatively small effects. For example, students often question the credibility of the normative data, the content fails to capture students' attention, and heavy drinkers often react to feedback defensively. These issues are not surprising as, unlike social media and digital gaming applications that capture and sustain young adults' attention, web-based PNF formats lack the sophisticated digital graphics, social interactivity, and other dynamic features to which students have become accustomed. Further, colleges often make participation mandatory or offer incentives to enroll students in current interventions, likely a detriment to student motivation and thus intervention effectiveness. CampusGANDR (Gamified Alcohol Norm Discovery and Re-education) addresses these issues by delivering alcohol PNF within a fun, gamified smartphone app that tests first-year students' perceptions of college life and classmates' attitudes and behaviors on a weekly basis across the first semester of college. Integrating features from popular social media platforms and evidence-based digital game mechanics (e.g., co-presence, a wager-based system of points, and chance-based uncertainty), CampusGANDR also features enhanced PNF and includes several novel features informed by longstanding cognitive and social psychological theories.
Based on extensive pilot work, the current proposal seeks to: 1) evaluate the efficacy of CampusGANDR in a large-scale multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT); 2) identify the optimal dosage of alcohol feedback to deliver within CampusGANDR for correcting norms and reducing alcohol use among students who differ in alcohol use (non-drinkers, light to moderate drinkers, and heavy drinkers); 3) examine person-level moderators of intervention efficacy; and 4) evaluate CampusGANDR engagement and the sustainability of play among students who use the app but aren't recruited into the evaluation study (RCT).
Incoming first-year students at colleges and universities in California (Loyola Marymount University site) and Texas (University of Houston site) consecutive cohorts of first-year students will be invited to download the CampusGANDR app to test their perceptions of campus life compete against their classmates. Then, among students already playing CampusGANDR, a balanced sub-sample of 1,800 non-drinking, light/moderate drinking, and heavy drinking students will be invited to take part in an evaluation study (RCT). Study participants will play CampusGANDR over the initial 12 weeks of the fall semester and complete 4 surveys assessing their alcohol use, social media use, health behaviors, mental health, and adjustment to college. Study participants will be discretely randomized to receive alcohol feedback 0%, 33%, or 67% of weekly CampusGANDR rounds through a backend manipulation of chance elements. Students not meeting study eligibility criteria and those not electing to take part in the evaluation study will still take part in CampusGANDR. The dosage of alcohol feedback among these non-RCT players receive will be determined at random and their app usage data will be employed to assess app engagement and sustainability of play in the absence of study incentives. This project aims to culminate in a highly engaging, scalable, cutting-edge native smartphone app (IOS, Android) able to dynamically tailor the dosage of alcohol feedback delivered based on students' alcohol experience at the point of matriculation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
To play CampusGANDR individuals must:
Additional RCT Inclusion Criteria
To take part in the evaluation study participants must:
Exclusion criteria
for both:
Each week, all players will answer 3 questions of interest about first-year students' attitudes and behaviors (e.g., drinking, partying, exercising, studying, dorm life, etc.) generated by the student players. They will also guess how the typical same-sex student at their University answered the same questions and wager points on how close to the correct answer (group norm) each of their guesses is. Further, they will rate (e.g., thumbs up/thumbs down) the reported behaviors of other players and, then, submit and vote on questions for subsequent rounds. At the end of each week, players will receive enhanced personalized normative feedback feedback on two of the three questions, and receive feedback on how other students rated the answer they reported (preferred-sex injunctive norms).
Other names: GANDR
Time frame: baseline, 4 months
The Daily Drinking Questionnaire assessess the number of drinks consumed per week in a typical week over the past three months.
Time frame: baseline, 9 months
The Daily Drinking Questionnaire assesses the number of drinks consumed per week in a typical week over the past three months.
Time frame: baseline, 12 months
Assesses number of drinks consumed during an average week over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 4 months
Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ; Read et al., 2006) was used to assess alcohol-related negative consequences in the past month. Participants indicate whether or not they experienced each of 48 alcohol-related negative consequences in the past month (0 = no, 1 = yes). Items are summed to yield a total score reflecting the number of alcohol-related problems experienced. Scores range from 0 to 48, where higher scores indicate a greater number of alcohol-related negative consequences (worse outcome).
Time frame: baseline, 9 months
Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ; Read et al., 2006) was used to assess alcohol-related negative consequences in the past month. Participants indicate whether or not they experienced each of 48 alcohol-related negative consequences in the past month (0 = no, 1 = yes). Items are summed to yield a total score reflecting the number of alcohol-related problems experienced. Scores range from 0 to 48, where higher scores indicate a greater number of alcohol-related negative consequences (worse outcome).
Time frame: baseline, 12 months
Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ; Read et al., 2006) was used to assess alcohol-related negative consequences in the past month. Participants indicate whether or not they experienced each of 48 alcohol-related negative consequences in the past month (0 = no, 1 = yes). Items are summed to yield a total score reflecting the number of alcohol-related problems experienced. Scores range from 0 to 48, where higher scores indicate a greater number of alcohol-related negative consequences (worse outcome).
Time frame: baseline, 4 months
We used the Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol measure to assess peak drinks. Participants reported the largest number of drinks they consumed on one occasion in the past 30 days.
Time frame: baseline, 9 months
Assesses frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 12 months
Assesses frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 4 months
Assesses perceptions of weekly alcohol consumption among peers over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 9 months
Assesses perceptions of weekly alcohol consumption among peers over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 12 months
Assesses perceptions of weekly alcohol consumption among peers over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 4 months
Assesses perceptions of peers' frequency and quantity of drinking over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 9 months
Assesses perceptions of peers' frequency and quantity of drinking over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 12 months
Assesses perceptions of peers' frequency and quantity of drinking over the past month
Time frame: baseline, 4 months
Perceived Injunctive Norms scale was used to assess participants' estimates of how acceptable other same-sex students at their university find each of 15 drinking behaviors (e.g., drinking to get drunk, drinking alone, driving after drinking). Participants rate the acceptability of each behavior on a scale from 1 (completely unacceptable) to 7 (completely acceptable). Ratings are averaged across all 15 items to yield a total score ranging from 1 to 7, where higher scores indicate greater perceived peer approval of drinking behaviors.
Time frame: baseline, 9 months
Perceived Injunctive Norms scale was used to assess participants' estimates of how acceptable other same-sex students at their university find each of 15 drinking behaviors (e.g., drinking to get drunk, drinking alone, driving after drinking). Participants rate the acceptability of each behavior on a scale from 1 (completely unacceptable) to 7 (completely acceptable). Ratings are averaged across all 15 items to yield a total score ranging from 1 to 7, where higher scores indicate greater perceived peer approval of drinking behaviors.
Time frame: baseline, 12 months
Perceived Injunctive Norms scale was used to assess participants' estimates of how acceptable other same-sex students at their university find each of 15 drinking behaviors (e.g., drinking to get drunk, drinking alone, driving after drinking). Participants rate the acceptability of each behavior on a scale from 1 (completely unacceptable) to 7 (completely acceptable). Ratings are averaged across all 15 items to yield a total score ranging from 1 to 7, where higher scores indicate greater perceived peer approval of drinking behaviors; group-level data are summarized using the Mean (Measure Type) and SD (Dispersion Type).
Loyola Marymount University
Other
Revolutionizing Normative Re-education: Delivering Enhanced PNF Within a Social Media Inspired Game About College Life
Acronym: GANDR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05345951
Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03864237
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Drinking in College
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06885320
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Drinking in College
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05180539
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Drinking in College
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details