Sapienza University of Rome
Roma, 00161, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07378618
This randomized clinical trial has the objective of comparing the accuracy of palatal paramedian miniscrew placement using static computer-assisted surgery (s-CAS) and dynamic computer-assisted surgery (d-CAS).
A population of forty subjects requiring palatal paramedian miniscrew insertion is going to be randomized into two groups to receive two miniscrews placed with s-CAS (Group A; n=20 subjects, 40 miniscrews) and d-CAS (Group B; n=20 subjects, 40 miniscrews). Preoperative digital intraoral scans and CBCT images will be used for virtual planning. Group A procedures is going to employ patient-specific surgical guides, while group B procedures is going to be performed with real-time navigation. Immediate postoperative CBCT scans will be superimposed to measure four accuracy parameters: coronal, apical, depth, and angular deviation from the planned position. Statistical analysis will include Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Roma, 00161, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This intervention consists of a standardized digital workflow for orthodontic miniscrew placement in the paramedian region of the maxillary palate.
Based on this integrated dataset, miniscrew position, angulation, and insertion depth are virtually planned to achieve bicortical anchorage while respecting predefined safety margins. Miniscrew insertion is performed under local anesthesia using self-drilling orthodontic miniscrews of standardized dimensions, without pre-drilling. Depending on group allocation, placement is carried out using either a static surgical guide or real-time dynamic navigation, while imaging acquisition and planning protocols remain identical. Immediate postoperative CBCT imaging is obtained to verify miniscrew position and to allow quantitative accuracy assessment.
Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
The linear deviation at the apical endpoint of the miniscrew (in millimeters)
Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
The linear deviation at the coronal entry point of the miniscrew (in millimeters)
Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
quantifies the vertical displacement of the apical tip (in millimeters)
Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
the angular difference between the planned and actual screw trajectories (in angular degrees)
University of Roma La Sapienza
Other
Accuracy of Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement: Static vs Dynamic Computer-Guided Techniques in a Randomized Clinical Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03714087
Malocclusion, Orthodontics
View Trial DetailsNCT01246830
Cephalometry, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Leuven, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07645417
Anchorage Planning, Canine Retraction
Dhaka, Bangladesh
View Trial DetailsNCT06882395
Clear Aligner Appliance, Malocclusion
Curitba, Paraná, Brazil
View Trial Details