Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06882395

Impact of Aligner Replacement Protocols on Predictability of Planned Dental Movements: Evaluation of Double Aligner

The study will evaluate the impact of replacing aligners after 7 days with new aligners made of different materials on the predictability of planned dental movements. Three groups of participants will follow different aligner protocols, and the planned movements will be compared with the achieved ones. The study aims to provide relevant data for clinical practices with orthodontic aligners and assess participants' satisfaction with the treatment.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Malocclusion Clear Aligner Appliance Orthodontics Stomatognathic Diseases Tooth Diseases Tooth Movement

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Private orthodontic clinic

Curitba, Paraná, 81270-200, Brazil

About this study

This prospective clinical trial aims to determine whether replacing an aligner after 7 days with a new aligner of a different material affects the predictability of planned dental movements. A total of 114 adult patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with aligners-requiring bilateral tooth movements (extrusion, intrusion, rotation, tipping, or mesiodistal translation)-will be recruited and randomized into three groups with distinct aligner exchange protocols.

Group 1: 10 days of exclusive FLX aligner use. Group 2: 7 days of FLX aligner use followed by 3 days of FLX35 use. Group 3: 7 days of FLX aligner use followed by 3 days of a new FLX aligner. Within each group, patients will be further categorized into subgroups based on horizontal, vertical, and rotational movements. Digital study models, radiographs, and standardized clinical photographs will be used to compare planned versus achieved tooth movements. The primary outcome is the predictability of movement, defined as the difference and percentage of planned versus actual movement. Secondary outcomes include participant satisfaction measured via the OHIP-14 questionnaire. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired tests appropriate for the split-mouth design. The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all treatment costs will be covered by the sponsor, NeoDent (JJGC Industria e Comercio de Materiais Dentarios S.A.).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older, with full permanent dentition.
  • Interested in orthodontic treatment with aligners.
  • Planned movements include extrusion, intrusion, rotation, tipping, or mesiodistal translation.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindications to aligner use, including allergies to polyurethane or PETG.
  • Poor oral hygiene or active periodontal disease.
  • Malocclusions involving multiple missing teeth or short clinical crowns.

Treatment and study plan

Group 1: FLX aligners for 10 days

Device

FLX aligners worn for 10 days

Group 3: FLX aligners for 7 days, followed by new FLX aligners for 3 days.

Device

Group 3: FLX aligners worn for 7 days, followed by new FLX aligners for 3 days.

Group 2: FLX aligners worn for 7 days, followed by FLX35 aligners for 3 days.

Device

Group 2: FLX aligners for 7 days, followed by FLX35 aligners for 3 days.

Primary outcomes

  1. Tooth movement and predictability achieved by different aligner materials, evaluated through radiographs and intraoral scanning

    Time frame: 7 days

    Digital study models (obtained using an intraoral scanner), along with standardized digital panoramic and periapical radiographs, will be collected at three key stages: before treatment initiation (for diagnosis and planning), during treatment, and immediately after treatment completion (for assessing the results). This follows the standard clinical practice in orthodontic treatment.

    The intraoral scans will be analyzed in conjunction with the planned movement models generated by the orthodontic treatment planning software.

    To evaluate treatment efficacy, tooth tracking will be performed using Geomagic Control X. This analysis will compare the planned tooth movement (reported in mm) with the actual movement achieved (reported in mm). The planned movement aligns with the expected total. Therefore, the percentage (%) of orthodontic movement successfully completed will be calculated based on the measurements.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Neodent

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 18, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 21, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.