Clinique de la sauvegarde
Lyon, France
NCT Number: NCT05435040
The objective of the study is to compare, with or without wearing an elastic proprioceptive knee brace, the functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee in patients suffering from proprioceptive deficit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lyon, France
This proprioceptive deficit is found following various traumas or injuries such as Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture, for example.
The use of joint stabilizers (such as knee braces) will allow an increase in sensory input (particularly at the level of cutaneous mechanoreceptors), and improve the biomechanics of the injured joint.
The objective of the study is to compare, with or without wearing an elastic proprioceptive knee brace, the functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee in patients suffering from proprioceptive deficit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
the patient will perform the tests with the knee brace
the patient will perform the tests without the knee brace
Time frame: Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)
The functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee is measured via the 3-axis composite score of the Y Balance Test (YBT). This score corresponds to the average of the 3 maximum distances obtained during the YBT test, normalized by leg length.
Time frame: Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)
Tactile sensitivity (Baresthesia) via the use of Weinstein monofilaments.
Time frame: Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)
Sensitivity to the position of a joint by determining the perception of the position of the leg in space via the JPS (Joint Position Sense) test.
Time frame: Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)
Static stability level is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no stability (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum stability (better outcome).
Time frame: Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)
Stability level when walking is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no stability (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum stability (better outcome).
Time frame: Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)
Discomfort level when walking is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no discomfort (better outcome) and 10 to maximum discomfort (worst outcome).
Time frame: Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)
Fluidity level is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no fluidity (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum fluidity (better outcome).
Time frame: Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)
Range of motion of the knee level is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no range of motion (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum range of motion (better outcome).
Time frame: Day 1
Patient satisfaction with the use of the knee brace via a specific questionnaire composed of 15 questions.
Time frame: Day 1
Evaluation of the patient's tolerance to the use of the knee brace through the collection of adverse events.
Thuasne
Industry
Acronym: CAPROG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07420608
Balance; Distorted, Brain Diseases
Swāt, Peshawar, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06879756
Back Injuries, Congenital Abnormalities
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05027841
Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Gait, Hemiplegic
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05663541
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details