Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01536184

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Attachment-Focused Intervention in Preschool Children With FASD

Study Summary: This study is being conducted in order to rigorously evaluate the real-world effectiveness of a publicly-funded, home-based, attachment-focused intervention Circle of Security (COS) Family Intervention Model (Marvin) in improving caregiving and child outcomes in families who have children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) or who are at-risk for FASD, as delivered under routine practice conditions.

Hypothesis: At post-test (after 36 sessions and 3-month follow-up), compared to a wait-list control group receiving standard services, the treatment group receiving COS will show greater improvement in caregiver behaviour, as well as child emotional and behavioural outcomes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

See Arms and Intervention

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Two criteria must be present for a family (caregiver-child dyad) to be included in the COS component of the FASD Outreach Program and its evaluation:
  • the child was exposed to alcohol prenatally and has been clinically evaluated using the Canadian FASD diagnostic guidelines as having Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS), Partial Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (PFAS), Alcohol Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder (ARND), or is considered "at risk" for FASD based on their confirmed history of prenatal alcohol exposure and clinical multidisciplinary assessment; and
  • evidence of disrupted caregiver behaviours or problems in the caregiver-child interaction as identified through a screening process consisting of clinical judgment and the SBSH procedure.

Exclusion criteria

  • children from foster families who have experienced more than 2 placements in the last six months,
  • children who have an Autism diagnosis,
  • children with a developmental quotient less than 50,
  • children with sensory impairments (hearing or sight impaired), and
  • children who are already involved in New Directions' 'Self Regulation Therapy Project'.

Children who have parents who are clinically depressed, whose parents have substance abuse or domestic violence issues, or whose parents display a narcissistic devaluation personality trait based on initial clinical evaluation, will also be excluded from study eligibility.

Treatment and study plan

Circle of Security (COS)

Behavioral

COS is a community based, visually supported, individualized attachment protocol appropriate for use with preschoolers and children and their parents/caregivers. It is based on attachment theory of John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth and integrates neuroscientific principles of emotional regulation and attachment. The protocol contains both educational and therapeutic components. The goals of the intervention include increasing caregiver sensitivity and appropriate responsiveness to their child through increasing their capacity to recognize and understand their child's cues, and increasing caregiver self-reflection on their own caregiving behaviour.

Other names: Attachment Intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Attachment Classification

    Time frame: Administered 3 times: at baseline (pretest), 9 months (postest), 12 months (followup)

    Attachment classified using Ainsworth's Strange Situation protocol: Secure, Anxious-Insecure, Anxious-Avoidant, Avoidant, Disorganized.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Parenting Scale (TPS)

    Time frame: Administered 3 times: at baseline (pretest), 9 months (postest), 12 months (followup)

    A self-report measure of dysfunctional parenting practices including laxness, over-reactivity, and verbosity. The scale has good internal consistency and test-restest reliability and scores are consistent with other measures of dysfunctional discipline and child misbehaviour.

    Each subscale score, ranges from 1 to 7; for each subscale (Laxness, Overreactivity, Verbosity) lower values indicate a lower degree of self-perceived ineffective parenting behaviors and higher values indicate a greater degree of self perceived ineffective parenting behaviours. The total score is calculated from a combination of each subscale and also ranges from 1 to 7, reflecting the degree of ineffective parenting behaviours across all categories with lower values indicate a lower degree of self-perceived ineffective parenting behaviors and higher values indicate a greater degree of self perceived ineffective parenting behaviours.

  2. The Parenting Stress Index (PSI)

    Time frame: Administered 3 times: at baseline (pretest), 9 months (postest), 12 months (followup)

    A parent-report questionnaire of parental stress reflecting parent-child interaction style and difficult child behaviour. There are two main domain scores, a Child Domain Score and Parent Domain Score from which a Total Stress Score is calculated.

    Child and Parent Domain raw scores combine to form a Total Stress raw score. Higher scores for each item indicate a higher degree of negative attributes in the given scale while lower scores indicate lower relationship stress and a greater sense of enjoyment in the relationship.

    Items include:

    Defensive Responding (DR) Score range 7-35 Parental Distress (PD) Score range 12-60 Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction (PCDI) Score range 12-60 Difficult Child (DC) Score range 12-60 PSI Total Stress Score range 36-180

  3. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS)

    Time frame: Administered 3 times: at baseline (pretest), 9 months (postest), 12 months (followup)

    A self-report measure of depression, anxiety, and stress. The scales of the DASS show high internal consistency and produce meaningful discriminations in different settings, and are appropriate for measuring the emotional states of caregivers over time.

    The score for each item ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates "did not apply to me at all" and 3 indicates "applied to me very much, or most of the time". The individual items are combined using a scoring template into measures of Depression (D), Anxiety (A), and Stress (S). Depression is scored out of 28 where 0-9 is normal and 10-28 reflect mild, moderate, and severe degrees of depression. Anxiety is scored out of 20 where 0-7 is normal and 8-20 reflect mild, moderate, and severe degrees of anxiety. Stress is scored out of 34 where 0-14 is normal and 15-34 reflect mild, moderate, and severe degrees of stress.

  4. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire SDQ

    Time frame: Administered 3 times: at baseline (pretest), 9 months (postest), 12 months (followup)

    The Emotional Symptoms (SDQ-ES), Conduct Problems (SDQ-CP), Hyperactivity (SDQ-HA), Peer Problems (SDQ-PP), and Prosocial (SDQ-PS) Scales each range from 0-10 Higher values in (ES, CP, HA, and PP) indicate a greater degree of abnormal behavior; low values indicate more normative behavior. For the PS scale, higher values indicate greater strengths in prosocial behaviour and lower values indicate more difficulties with prosocial behavior. A Total Difficulties Score ranges from 0 to 40 with higher scores reflecting higher levels of behavioral difficulty. The Total Impact Supplement Score (Total IS) ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater behavioral difficulty and social impairment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Manitoba

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Attachment-Focused Intervention in Preschool Children With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) or At-risk for FASD: A Randomized Controlled Field Trial

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Feb 20, 2012
Registry last updated
Aug 25, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.