Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06747650

Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Feasibility Trial

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). In partnership with a community mental health practice, Genesee Valley Psychology (GVP), two cohorts of five adolescents with FASD and their caregivers will participate in an already existing comprehensive DBT-A program (including individual therapy, group skills training, and 24/7 phone coaching). This program has been adapted for neurodivergent teens, including the development of trainings for mental health clinicians on FASD. The aim of the current study is to assess the acceptability of DBT-A from the perspective of teens, caregivers, and clinicians. Additionally, barriers and facilitators of implementing DBT-A with teens with FASD, as well as the feasibility of the research protocol will be assessed to inform later larger-scale trials.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inclusion Criteria:

For adolescents:

  • Ages 14-17 years
  • Have a diagnosis of FASD under any diagnostic criteria
  • Residing in the state of New York
  • Willing and able to attend group sessions virtually
  • Have one of the following:
  • A diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, borderline personality disorder, or multiple other serious mental health diagnoses
  • A history of multiple psychiatric hospitalizations and/or recurring presentation at psychiatric emergency rooms
  • A score of 7+ on the McLean screening instrument (MSI; instrument attached and included in eligibility screen)
  • Have functional deficits in three of five problem areas:
  • Emotional dysregulation
  • Impulsivity (including avoidance)
  • Interpersonal challenges
  • Teenager and family challenges
  • Reduced awareness and focus
  • Access to the internet and device with Zoom capabilities

For caregivers:

  • Parent or legal guardian of an adolescent (ages 14-17 years) with an FASD diagnosis
  • Residing in the state of New York
  • Willing and able to attend group sessions virtually
  • Access to the internet and device with Zoom capabilities

For clinicians:

  • Employee of GVP
  • Administered DBT-A to teens with FASD as part of this study

Exclusion criteria

  • • Adolescent, caregiver, or clinician has insufficient proficiency in English
  • Primary psychotic disorder
  • Ongoing substance/drug dependence or eating disorder at such a level that would impede engagement with DBT modalities (i.e. if an individual requires detoxification or hospitalization for stabilization)
  • Adolescent or caregiver has a moderate to severe intellectual disability (IQ < 51)

Treatment and study plan

Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents

Behavioral

Standard of care (SOC) DBT-A includes approximately six weeks of pretreatment, and approximately six months of DBT-A skills group, individual therapy, and 24/7 phone coaching. During pre-treatment, clients are oriented to the DBT-A model and client commitment to treatment is established. After approximately six weeks, the client enters DBT-A skills group along with their caregiver. This skills group meets weekly for 1.5 hours and clinicians explain the five main DBT-A skills (mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, interpersonal effectiveness, and walking the middle path) via PowerPoints and discussion. Clients and their caregivers are assigned weekly homework. At the same time, teens are completing weekly 1-hour individual therapy sessions where they are utilizing the skills learned in group. Both teens and caregivers have access to what DBT-A calls 24/7 phone coaching. This phone coaching is 24/7 access to a therapist when a crisis is arising.

Primary outcomes

  1. Difficulties in emotion regulation scale caregiver and self-report

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 35

    The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a validated self-report measure designed to assess challenges in regulating emotions. It evaluates six dimensions of emotion regulation difficulties: non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior when distressed, impulse control challenges during emotional distress, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to effective emotion regulation strategies, and lack of clarity about emotional experiences. This study will utilize the brief form consisting of 18 items rated on a Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater difficulties in emotion regulation. Each scale has a score range of 3 to 15.

  2. Child behavior checklist caregiver and youth report

    Time frame: Baseline and week 35

    The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a standardized, parent-reported questionnaire designed to assess a wide range of emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents. It is part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) and evaluates competencies and problems in various domains. The CBCL yields scores across internalizing behaviors (e.g., anxiety, depression), externalizing behaviors (e.g., aggression, rule-breaking), and total problems. It also provides syndrome scales (e.g., anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, social problems) and DSM-oriented scales aligned with diagnostic criteria. The scales are reported as t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The higher the t-score, the more significant the behavioral issues.

  3. The theoretical framework of acceptability questionnaire

    Time frame: Week 35

    The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) defines acceptability as a multi-dimensional construct. The TFA identifies several dimensions that shape individuals' experiences with an intervention, including their affective attitude toward the intervention, the perceived burden or effort required to engage with it, the alignment of the intervention with their personal values and beliefs, and the extent to which they understand its purpose and mechanisms. It also considers the perceived opportunity costs of participation, participants' beliefs about the intervention's effectiveness, and their confidence in their ability to successfully engage with it. Each question is a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating highter acceptability of treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item

    Time frame: Base line to 9 months

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used self-report tool designed to screen for, diagnose, and monitor the severity of depressive symptoms. It is based on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder outlined in the DSM, making it a clinically relevant and psychometrically robust measure. The PHQ-9 consists of nine items that assess the frequency of core depressive symptoms, such as low mood, loss of interest or pleasure in activities, fatigue, changes in sleep or appetite, feelings of worthlessness, difficulty concentrating, and thoughts of self-harm or death. Respondents rate the severity of these symptoms over the past two weeks on a four-point scale, ranging from "not at all" to "nearly every day," yielding a total score that indicates depression severity. Higher scores suggest more severe depressive symptoms.

  2. General Anxiety Disorder 7-item

    Time frame: Base line to 9 months

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) is a brief, self-report measure designed to screen for, assess, and monitor the severity of generalized anxiety symptoms. It evaluates core symptoms of anxiety based on criteria outlined in the DSM, including excessive worry, restlessness, difficulty concentrating, irritability, muscle tension, and sleep disturbance. Respondents rate the frequency of these symptoms over the past two weeks on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from "not at all" to "nearly every day." The total score provides an indication of anxiety severity, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom burden.

  3. Clinician therapeutic note documentation

    Time frame: Base line to 9 months

    Clinician documentation of client participation, homework completion, attention during session, camera use during virtual sessions, and therapy-interfering behaviors.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 24, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.