Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07399314

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a School-based Stepped Care Treatment Model for Adolescent Depression in Pakistan

This study aims to test the effectiveness of a stepped-care model to reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents in school settings in Pakistan. The study will examine whether the universal intervention, delivered by non-specialists, can reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents after 3 months. For adolescents who do not improve with universal intervention, the study will assess whether a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based guided self-help app can provide additional support as a second-step intervention. Six hundred adolescents aged 13-15 from 40 schools in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, will take part. The study will determine which interventions work best and for which students to reduce depressive symptoms in school settings in Pakistan.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

13 year–15 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Global Institute of Human Development

Islamabad, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan

About this study

Introduction:

Depression and anxiety symptoms among adolescents can have long-term negative effects on academic, social, and emotional development if not identified and treated early. School-based interventions, both universal and indicated, are recommended to address these symptoms. However, the optimal timing, dosage, and sequencing of such interventions remain unclear, particularly in low-resource settings. The SMART-STEP study in Pakistan aims to address this gap by evaluating two evidence-informed interventions within a stepped-care model: the universal intervention, delivered by trained non-specialists to provide early support to adolescents in schools, and a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based guided self-help application, designed for adolescents with persistent symptoms. Both interventions are endorsed by the WHO and UNICEF as part of the Helping Adolescent Thrive Toolkit. This study seeks to answer the question, "What works, for whom, under what conditions, and why, for reducing depressive symptoms in adolescents?"

Methods and Analysis:

The investigators will conduct a clustered Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Controlled Trial (SMART) to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions, determine optimal timing and dosage, and identify which students benefit most from which intervention.

Study Setting and Participants: Forty eligible public schools in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, stratified by gender, will be included. Following ethical approvals, adolescents aged 13-15 years will be screened for psychological distress using the Paediatric Symptoms Checklist (PSC). Adolescents scoring above the threshold (≥28 on PSC) will be eligible for the trial. 600 adolescents will be recruited.

Stage 1 Randomisation: Schools and participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio into intervention and control arms. The universal socioemotional life skills intervention will be delivered by non-specialists to adolescents in classroom settings.

Stage 2 Randomization: Adolescents who are non-responders at 3 months, defined as PHQ-9 scores ≥ 5, will be individually re-randomised to one of two options:

Continue with the initial intervention or augment with the CBT-based guided self-help app Outcomes: The primary outcome is reduction in depressive symptoms at 9-month from baseline. Secondary outcomes include changes in symptoms of anxiety, psychosocial distress, functioning, and perceived psychological well-being.

Ethics and Dissemination:

Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Global Institute of Human Development, Islamabad, Pakistan. Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or primary caregivers, and assent will be obtained from adolescents. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, and community forums.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adolescents aged 13-15 years, currently enrolled in participating schools
  • Provide assent for participation
  • Parental/guardian consent provided
  • Screen positive for psychosocial distress on the youth-reported Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), defined as a total score ≥ 28

Exclusion criteria

  • Adolescents who require immediate in-patient (medical and/or psychiatric) care
  • Adolescents with acute protection risks as assessed by a researcher applying the definitions in the WHO mhGAP intervention guide.

Treatment and study plan

Universal Intervention & CBT-based Guided Self-Help Application

Behavioral

The first-stage intervention is universal intervention in the intervention arm and TAU in the control arm. In the intervention arm, adolescents receive universal intervention from non-specialists, while in the control arm, they receive TAU. Universal intervention, based on developmental, behavioral, social, and cognitive theories, aims to provide basic psychological support to adolescents, build their socioemotional life skills, and strengthen collaboration between parents and schools, including referral pathways for those requiring specialist care. The second-stage intervention is a CBT-based self-help app. At 3-months, adolescents scoring ≥5 on the PHQ-9 in both arms (indicating the presence of depressive symptoms) are individually re-randomized to continue their initial treatment (universal or TAU) or receive a step-up, CBT-based guided self-help app.

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for adolescents

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3-months, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for adolescents, a 9-item instrument rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms (worse outcome) over the past 2 weeks. The PHQ-9 has been previously adapted and validated in Pakistan and has demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.83).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Paediatric Symptoms Checklist (PSC)

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3-months, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    The PSC is a 35-item screening scale comprising three subscales: internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems. Items are rated on a 3-point scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 70. Higher scores indicate greater psychosocial difficulties (worse outcome). The Urdu version of the PSC has been adapted and validated in Pakistan and has demonstrated good reliability and validity.

  2. Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    This is a 25-item instrument rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with a total transformed score ranging from 0 to 100, used to measure levels of anxiety and low mood. The instrument comprises two subscales (anxiety and depression). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity (worse outcome). The measure has been adapted and used successfully in Pakistan.

  3. DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure is a self-rated screening instrument that assesses mental health domains relevant across psychiatric diagnoses. It is used to identify additional areas of inquiry that may have a significant impact on the child's treatment and prognosis. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity (worse outcome) over the past 2 weeks.

  4. Checklist of Somatic Symptoms of Distress

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    The Checklist of Somatic Symptoms of Distress is a 10-item instrument rated on a 3-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20, used to assess somatic symptoms of distress. Higher scores indicate greater somatic symptom severity (worse outcome). The measure has been previously adapted and used in Pakistan.

  5. Experience of Bullying

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    Experience of bullying in the past 30 days will be measured using a contextualised version of the Bullying Victimization Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater levels of peer victimisation (worse outcome).

  6. School Climate

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    Change in school climate, including students' relationships with teachers, sense of belonging with the school and peers, commitment to school tasks, and participation in school activities, will be measured using an adapted version of the Beyond Blue School Climate Questionnaire (BBSCQ). The questionnaire consists of 28 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 84. Higher scores indicate a more favourable perception of the school climate (better outcome). The measure will be administered to both adolescents and their caregivers.

  7. Annual Academic Performance and Classroom Attendance

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9-months]

    Academic performance and classroom attendance will be assessed using official school records, which have been previously used by the investigators in Pakistan. Annual academic performance will be recorded as percentage scores (0-100), with higher scores indicating better academic performance (better outcome). Classroom attendance will be recorded as the percentage of days attended during the academic year (0-100%), with higher percentages indicating better attendance (better outcome).

  8. Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWS)

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) is a 7-item self-report measure assessing mental wellbeing, focusing on positive functioning of thoughts and feelings over the past two weeks. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time." Total scores range from 7 to 35, calculated by summing item responses. Higher scores indicate better mental wellbeing (better outcome).

  9. Caregivers' Wellbeing

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    The Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ) will be used to assess psychological distress, represented by subscales of physical symptoms and emotional symptoms. Items are scored 0 or 1, where a score of 1 indicates the presence of a symptom of psychological distress. Total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress (worse outcome).

  10. Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    Parenting practices will be assessed using the Positive Involvement subscale of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ). This subscale assesses the extent to which parents engage positively with their children, including friendly communication, involvement in planning and conducting activities, awareness of children's free-time activities, playing games together, helping with homework, interest in day-to-day plans, and knowledge of children's friends. Items are rated on a Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater positive parental involvement (better outcome).

  11. PSYCHLOPS (Child's psychosocial well-being and functioning)

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    Child insight into problems and wellbeing will be measured using the self-administered PSYCHLOPS-Kids. The measure assesses three domains: problems, functioning, and wellbeing. PSYCHLOPS-Kids has three versions (pre-therapy, during-therapy, and post-therapy). In this study, the pre-therapy and post-therapy versions will be used as part of the assessment. Domain and total scores are calculated by summing item responses, with higher scores indicating greater problems and poorer wellbeing (worse outcome).

  12. Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    Global functioning will be assessed using a brief clinician-rated measure that rates adolescents on a scale from 1 to 100, categorised into ten functioning bands. Scores range from 1-10 (indicating severe impairment) to 91-100 (indicating superior functioning). Higher scores indicate better global functioning (better outcome).

  13. The Social Problem-Solving Inventory - Revised Short Form

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    This is a 25-item instrument rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4), used to assess social problem-solving skills, including positive problem orientation, negative problem orientation, rational problem solving, impulsivity-carelessness style, and avoidance style. Total scores are calculated by summing item responses (possible range 0-100). Higher scores indicate better social problem-solving skills (better outcome).

  14. Perceived Emotional/Personal Support Scale

    Time frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

    Perceived emotional support will be assessed using a measure rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 4, to assess the level of emotional support perceived by the child across three relationship categories: family members, non-family adults, and friends. Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived emotional support (better outcome).

  15. Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)

    Time frame: Enrollment, and 9-months from baseline

    Health service utilisation will be assessed using a structured measure to collect information on outpatient and inpatient healthcare services used by adolescents over a period of up to 9 months, including contacts with all types of healthcare providers. Higher values indicate greater health service utilisation.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Global Institute of Human Development

Other

Collaborators

  • Institute of Psychiatry, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi
  • National Ministry of Health Services, Regulations and Coordination
  • Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University

Registry information

Acronym: SMART-STEP

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Registry last updated
May 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.