Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03399786

Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by evinacumab intravenously (IV) in comparison to placebo after 24 weeks in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the effect of evinacumab IV on other lipid parameters, evaluate the effect of evinacumab on LDL-C goal attainment, assess the effect of evinacumab on eligibility for apheresis (using German and US apheresis criteria), evaluate the safety and tolerability of evinacumab in patients with HoFH, assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of evinacumab in patients with HoFH and evaluate the potential development of anti-evinacumab antibodies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities Dyslipidemias Genetic Diseases, Inborn Hyperlipidemias Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II Hyperlipoproteinemias Lipid Metabolism Disorders Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors Metabolic Diseases Metabolism, Inborn Errors Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Regeneron Research Site, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of functional HoFH
  • If undergoing LDL apheresis, must have initiated LDL apheresis at least 3 months prior to screening and must have been on a stable weekly or every other week schedule and/or stable settings for at least 8 weeks
  • Willing to consistently maintain his/her usual low fat or heart-healthy diet for the duration of the study

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at the screening visit
  • Background medical Lipid Modifying Therapy (LMT) (if applicable) that has not been stable before the screening visit
  • Lipid-apheresis schedule /apheresis settings (if applicable) that have not been stable for at least 8 weeks before the screening visit
  • Use of nutraceuticals or over-the-counter therapies known to affect lipids, at a dose/amount that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
  • Presence of any clinically significant uncontrolled endocrine disease known to influence serum lipids or lipoproteins
  • Newly diagnosed (within 3 months prior to randomization visit) diabetes mellitus or poorly controlled (HbA1c >9%) diabetes
  • History of a MI, unstable angina leading to hospitalization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, carotid surgery or stenting, stroke, transient ischemic attack, valve replacement surgery, carotid revascularization, endovascular procedure or surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease within 3 months prior to the screening visit
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Sexually active women of child bearing potential (WOCBP), who are unwilling to practice a highly effective birth control method prior to the initial dose, during the study, and for 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug
  • Men who are sexually active with women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) and are unwilling to consistently use condoms during the study drug treatment period and for 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug regardless of vasectomy status

Note: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Evinacumab

Drug

IV administration of evinacumab

Other names: REGN1500

Placebo

Drug

IV administration of placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Percent change was calculated as 100x(calculated LDL-C value at Week 24 - calculated LDL-C value at baseline)/calculated LDL-C value at baseline. The baseline LDL-C value was the last calculated LDL-C value obtained before the first dose of double-blind-study drug. The calculated LDL-C at week 24 was the LDL-C value obtained within the week 24 efficacy analysis window, regardless of adherence to treatment and subsequent therapies (intent-to-treat [ITT] estimand). The ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Percent change in Apo B from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  2. Percent Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  3. Percent Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Percent change in TC from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  4. Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Reduction in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: At Week 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in calculated LDL-C ≥30% at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  5. Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: At Week 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in calculated LDL-C ≥ 50% at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  6. Absolute Change in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Absolute change in calculated LDL-C from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Met United States (US) Apheresis Eligibility Criteria at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: At Week 24

    US apheresis eligibility criteria included participants who had inadequate response to diet and LMTs after 6 months of treatment and with functional Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) or Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) (with 0-1 risk factor) with LDL-C ≥ 300 mg/dL (7.77 mmol/L). Percentage of participants who met US apheresis eligibility criteria at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  8. Percentage of Participants With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (2.59 Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: At Week 24

    Percentage of participants with LDL-C value <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) in the DBTP at Week 24 was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analysed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Met European Union (EU) Apheresis Eligibility Criteria at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: At Week 24

    EU apheresis eligibility criteria included participants who had inadequate response to diet and Lipid modifying therapies (LMTs) after 3 months of treatment, Primary prevention: Participants with Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with LDL-C >160 mg/dL (4.2 mmol/L) and Cardiovascular (CV) events in close relatives. Secondary prevention: Participants with progressive CV events with LDL-C > 120 to 130 mg/dL (3.1-3.4 mmol/L). Percentage of participants who met EU apheresis eligibility criteria at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  10. Percentage of Participants With Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: At Week 24

    Percentage of participants with LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  11. Percent Change in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Percent change from baseline in TG at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  12. Percent Change in Lipoprotein A (Lp[a]) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Percent change in Lp(a) from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  13. Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Absolute change in Apo B from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  14. Absolute Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Absolute change in non-HDL-C from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  15. Absolute Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Absolute change in TC from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

  16. Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)

    Time frame: Week 24

    Percent change in Apo CIII from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jan 16, 2018
Registry last updated
May 18, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.