Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07629661

Effectiveness and Implementation of a Clinical Pain Management Dashboard for the NICU

This study protocol describes a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study evaluating a clinical decision support dashboard for neonatal pain management in a tertiary NICU. Using a pre- and post-implementation design, the study assesses whether the dashboard reduces the duration of inadequately managed neonatal discomfort during the first seven days of admission, while concurrently evaluating implementation outcomes such as acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, and penetration. Quantitative EHR- and dashboard-derived data are complemented by qualitative interviews and observations to provide a comprehensive evaluation of both clinical impact and implementation processes.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This protocol outlines a single-center, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study evaluating an in-house developed clinical decision support dashboard designed to optimize pain management in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The study is conducted at a level III-IV NICU and follows a pre-implementation (retrospective), mid-implementation, buffer, and post-implementation (prospective) design over approximately 26 months.

The primary effectiveness objective is to determine whether implementation of the dashboard reduces the duration of inadequately managed neonatal discomfort during the first seven days of admission. Discomfort is operationalized as the cumulative duration a neonate is classified as "red" by the dashboard prioritization algorithm, indicating the need for immediate clinical attention. Pre-implementation "red" classifications are generated retrospectively from electronic health record data using the same algorithmic criteria applied prospectively post-implementation.

The secondary objective is to evaluate the implementation process of the dashboard within routine NICU workflows. Implementation outcomes, based on the framework of Proctor et al., include acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity (implementation and effectiveness), and penetration. These outcomes are assessed using a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative measures such as dashboard use metrics, prescribing patterns, and timing of pain assessments with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and observations involving healthcare professionals and parents.

The comfort-dashboard is implemented using a phased ward-based approach supported by targeted training, local champions, and ongoing facilitation. The study poses minimal risk, as the dashboard supports but does not replace clinical decision-making, and no changes are made to core algorithm logic or outcome definitions during the study. By integrating effectiveness and implementation evaluations, this protocol aims to generate clinically relevant evidence while supporting reproducibility, transparency, and future scalability of digital decision support tools in neonatal care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Primary endpoint - Effectiveness evaluation (neonates):

  • Admitted to the NICU of Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital during either the pre-implementation or post-implementation phase
  • Admitted and discharged during the respective phase
  • Parental consent for use of medical information provided upon admission

Secondary endpoints - Implementation process evaluation (healthcare professionals):

  • Physician, nurse, or nurse specialist working in the NICU during the study period who has been exposed to TMD-C
  • Management staff who has been exposed to TMD-C

Secondary endpoints - Implementation process evaluation (parents):

  • Parent or guardian of an included neonate who was exposed to the dashboard during the samenzorgvisite (family-integrated ward round)

Primary endpoint - Effectiveness evaluation (neonates):

  • Readmitted to the NICU during the same study phase
  • Admitted to the NICU for less than 24 hours
  • Discharged or transferred before 7 days of admission without complete pain management data available

Secondary endpoints - Implementation process evaluation:

  • None

Treatment and study plan

Implementation of clinical pain management dashboard

Device

The comfort-dashboard designed to assist healthcare professionals in managing neonatal pain within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The software aggregates and visualizes patient-specific data from connected systems, providing near-real-time metrics, patient prioritization, and clinical decision support.

Primary outcomes

  1. Main study parameter/endpoint - Effectiveness evaluation

    Time frame: Days 1-7 of NICU admission, assessed through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live, November 2026).

    For the primary aim of our study, we will assess the effectiveness of the dashboard in improving the comfort of patients admitted to the NICU, defined by the difference in the duration of inadequately managed discomfort in neonates during the first seven days of admission. Here, the duration of inadequately managed discomfort is measured by the duration a patient has a 'red' status, as classified by the classification algorithm.

Secondary outcomes

  1. System Usability Scale (SUS) score among healthcare professionals

    Time frame: At 6 months post go-live (week 32-35)

    The SUS is a 10-item standardized questionnaire administered to healthcare professionals. Each item is rated 1-5. Odd-numbered item scores are reversed; all scores are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to yield a normalized score (range 0-100; higher = better usability). The SUS score is interpreted as a percentile rank.

  2. Qualitative assessment of acceptability of the dashboard among healthcare professionals and parents

    Time frame: At 6 months post go-live (week 32-35)

    Semi-structured interviews exploring perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation, usefulness, ease of use, and overall satisfaction with TMD-C, conducted with healthcare professionals and parents. Analysis uses direct content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

  3. Qualitative assessment of appropriateness of the implementation strategies within NICU workflows

    Time frame: Through study completion, ~13 months

    Perceived fit, relevance, and compatibility of the chosen implementation strategies, assessed through semi-structured interviews and systematic observations with healthcare professionals, analyzed using CFIR constructs.

  4. Proportion of healthcare professionals attending training sessions (%)

    Time frame: Weeks 0-7 (mid-implementation phase)

    Implementation fidelity measure: the proportion of healthcare professionals working in the NICU during the study period who attended at least one TMD-C training session.

  5. Use of loading doses at therapy initiation and dose-escalation (n; %)

    Time frame: Days 1-7 of admission through study completion, ~13 months

    The difference in the proportion of therapy initiations and dose-escalation events accompanied by a loading dose within the protocol-specified timeframe, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases, stratified by moment (initiation vs. escalation).

  6. Continuous infusion duration in patients without discomfort (minutes)

    Time frame: Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)

    The difference in the duration of continuous analgesic infusion in neonates classified as not experiencing discomfort, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases, stratified by drug and relevant patient characteristics.

  7. Dose-escalation titration step size (mg/kg/hr)

    Time frame: Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)

    The difference in starting dosage and height of subsequent dose escalation steps surrounding dose-escalation events, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases, stratified by drug and relevant patient characteristics.

  8. Duration of oversedation (minutes)

    Time frame: Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)

    The difference in the cumulative duration a patient is classified as oversedated, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases.

  9. Proportion of timely pain measurements following key therapy events (%)

    Time frame: Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)

    The difference in the proportion of pain measurements conducted within the protocol-specified timeframe after therapy initiation, dose-escalation, dose-decrease, and therapy discontinuation, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases, stratified by relevant patient characteristics.

  10. Number of dashboard accesses per morning round (n)

    Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 13 months post go-live

    The frequency of TMD-C access during morning rounds, used as a measure of penetration - the extent to which dashboard use has become part of routine NICU workflow.

Other outcomes

  1. Sex distribution of included neonates (n; %)

    Time frame: Through study completion, ~ 13 months

    Descriptive statistic for included neonates. Reported for both pre- and post-implementation cohorts.

  2. Birth weight of included neonates (grams)

    Time frame: Through study completion, ~ 13 months

    Descriptive statistic for included neonates. Expressed as mean (±SD) or median (±IQR) depending on data distribution. Reported for both pre- and post-implementation cohorts.

  3. Gestational age of included neonates (weeks)

    Time frame: Through study completion, ~ 13 months

    Descriptive statistic for included neonates. Expressed as mean (±SD) or median (±IQR) depending on data distribution. Reported for both pre- and post-implementation cohorts.

  4. Profession of healthcare professionals (n; %)

    Time frame: Through study completion, ~ 13 months

    Descriptive statistic for healthcare professionals participating in the implementation evaluation. Categories include physician, nurse, nurse specialist, and management. Reported for the post-implementation cohort.

  5. Years of clinical experience of healthcare professionals (years)

    Time frame: Through study completion, ~ 13 months

    Descriptive statistic for healthcare professionals. Expressed as mean (±SD) or median (±IQR) depending on data distribution. Reported for the post-implementation cohort.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Study on the Implementation of a Clinical Pain Management Dashboard for the NICU

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.