Ain Shams University
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07247565
Aim: compare effectiveness (satisfaction) and duration of pain relief between patients who perform the conventional thermal radiofrequency on the ganglion impar vs patients who perform the chemical neurolysis with alcohol in patients with non cancer coccydynia patients with non cancer coccydynia not responding to medical treatment will be divided into 2 groups before intervention , control group will receive conventional radiofrequency ablation of ganglion impar , while the study group will receive alcohol neurolysis
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me20 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The entry site was detected under fluoroscopy then local anesthesia was given using lidocaine 2% followed by the insertion of a radiofrequency cannulas (STRYKER 20 G, 9 cm with 1 cm active tip) targeting the junction between the coccygeal bones and pass through it anteriorly in the lateral view. Finally confirming the proper site with a contrast dye in lateral and A-P views.
10 ml of lidocaine 1 % was injected to tolerate the ablation then in the 1st group placing of the radiofrequency cable followed by ablation will be done at 80 degrees for 90 seconds.
The entry site was detected under fluoroscopy then local anesthesia was given using lidocaine 2% followed by the insertion 22 G spinal needle targeting the junction between the coccygeal bones and pass through it anteriorly in the lateral view. Finally confirming the proper site with a contrast dye in lateral and A-P views.
10 ml of lidocaine 1 % was injected to tolerate the ablation then injection of 5 ml 70% alcohol will be performed
Time frame: 1 month
patients will be asked to describe their pain on Numeric pain scale ( an 11 numbers scale where 0 describes no pain and 10 describes the worst pain ) and compare it to before the procedure
Time frame: 6 months after the procedure
patients will be asked to describe their pain on Numeric pain scale and compare it to before the procedure
Time frame: 6 months
one-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate their overall improvement after a treatment.he scale typically includes ratings such as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "unchanged," or "worse".
Ain Shams University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07629661
Agnosia, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Rotterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT02979574
Agnosia, Chronic Pain
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07016386
Agnosia, Nervous System Diseases
Giza, Giza Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06629727
Agnosia, Anxiety Disorders
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details