Souad Kafafi University Hospital (SKUH), Faculty of medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST)
Giza, Giza Governorate, 15525, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07016386
This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided Interscalene block (ISB) versus Infraspinatus-Teres minor (ITM) interfacial plane block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery.
A prospective, randomized clinical trial will be conducted with 46 patients. Approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee (2022/0126), and written informed consent will be collected from all participants. Patients aged 20-70, ASA I-II, scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery will be divided before the induction of general anesthesia (GA) into two groups:
Group A: will receive the ultrasound guided ISB technique with a 15ml solution of 7.5ml lidocaine 2% and 7.5ml bupivacaine 0.5% be injected between the anterior and middle scalene muscles.
Group B: will receive the ultrasound guided ITM block with the same anesthetic solution be injected between the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles.
Researchers will examine the following outcomes;
1. Primary outcome measure: Efficacy of analgesia by Pain score; will be measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score (0=no pain,1-3=mild,4-6=moderate,7-9=sever,10=most sever) at postoperative 12 hour. 2. Secondary outcome measures:
1. Duration of analgesia, starting from recovery from general anesthesia (GA) to 1st time giving the patient rescue analgesia ( measured by NRS pain score at 0, 6 ,12, 18 and 24 postoperative hours) 2. Risk of complications from techniques 3. Patient satisfaction after surgery. 4. Rescue analgesic consumption 5. Hemodynamics monitoring; measurements of heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure before induction of anesthesia and every 15 minutes during surgery till end of surgery
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me20 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Giza, Giza Governorate, 15525, Egypt
I. Study design:
Randomized comparative study.
II. Study setting and location:
The study will be conducted at the operative room of Souad Kafafi University Hospital (SKUH), Misr University of science and Technology (MUST).
III. Study population:
Patients aged from 20 to 60 years old scheduled for shoulder surgery will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio after induction of general anesthesia (GA) to either: Group A: Received the ultrasound guided ISB technique with a 15ml solution of 7.5ml lidocaine 2% and 7.5ml bupivacaine 0.5% injected between the anterior and middle scalene muscles.
Group B: Received the ultrasound guided ITM block with the same anesthetic solution injected between the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles.
IV. Study procedures:
The patients will be randomly allocated into two groups:
Group A:
Ultrasound-guided Interscalene block (ISB) technique.
Group B:
Ultrasound-guided Infraspinatus-teres minor (ITM) interfacial plane block technique
V. Study outcomes:
VII. Statistical analysis:
Sample size calculation was based on pain score after Interscalene block (ISB) in shoulder surgery versus other methods retrieved from previous research (Singelyn et al., 2004) (15). Using G power program version 3.1.9.4 to calculate sample size based on effect size of 0.897 (35 ± 25) versus (13±24), using 2-tailed test, α error =0.05 and power = 80.0%, the total calculated sample size will be 21 in each group at least and by adding 10% to compensate for possible drop out then total sample size per group is 23 cases at least.
Data will be analyzed using SPSS (statistical package for social sciences) version 22. Quantitative data will be tested for normality by Kolmogrov-Smironv test then described as mean and standard deviation for normally distributed data, and median and range for non-normally distributed, Qualitative data will be presented as number and percent. The appropriate statistical test will be applied according to data type with the following suggested tests: Student t test and Mann Whitney U test for continuous variables, Chi-Square test for categorical variable.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Group A: will receive an ultrasound-guided interscalene block (ISB) using a 15ml mixture of lidocaine (7.5ml 2%) and bupivacaine (7.5ml 0.5%).
Group B:will receive an ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor (ITM) interfacial plane block using a 15ml mixture of lidocaine (7.5ml 2%) and bupivacaine (7.5ml 0.5%).
Time frame: at 12 hours postoperatively
Will be measured by pain score at 12 hours postoperatively using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10; with 0 means no pain and 10 means most intolerable pain)
Time frame: Starting from recovery from general anesthesia (GA) to 1st time giving the patient rescue analgesia,
duration of analgesia measured by Pain score at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 with 0 means no pain and 10 means most intolerable pain.
Time frame: before induction of anesthesia and every 15 minutes during surgery till end of surgery
measurements of heart rate (beat per minute)
Time frame: During surgery; from induction of anesthesia to end of surgery.
Need and consumption of fentanyl intraoperatively (ug),
Time frame: for the first postoperative 24 hours
very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, neutral, satisfied, very satisfied
Time frame: From time of injection to the end of first 24 hours postoperative
Local anesthetics toxicity, pneumothorax, phrenic nerve palsy, hematoma formation
Time frame: From recovery from general anesthesia to end of 24hours postoperatively
Time to 1st request of rescue analgesia and total dose of postoperative morphine consumption in the studied groups for 24 hours (mg)
Time frame: Before induction of anesthesia and every 15 minutes during surgery till end of surgery
Measurement of mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg)
Misr University for Science and Technology
Other
Ultrasound-guided Interscalene Block (ISB) Versus Infraspinatus-Teres Minor (ITM) Interfacial Plane Block in Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery
Acronym: (ISB)-(ITM)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07226700
Agnosia, JOURNAVX
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07335159
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07562412
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06889870
Agnosia, Anesthesia
Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial Details