Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02000258

Effect of Tunnel Placements on Clinical and MRI Findings Two Years After ACL Reconstruction With DB Technique

Purpose: To find out whether the clinical and MRI findings two years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were associated with each other so that MRI-based graft invisibility in the anteromedial (AM) graft would have an impact on anteroposterior stability of the knee, and MRI-based posterolateral (PL) graft invisibility on rotational stability of the knee.

Methods: 75 patients. One experienced orthopaedic surgeon performed all double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructions. Two independent examiners made the clinical examinations at the two-year follow-up: clinical examination of the knee, KT-1000, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee evaluation scores and IKDC functional score. The MRI evaluations were made by two musculoskeletal radiologists separately and the means of these measurements were used.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Tampere University hospital

Tampere, Pirkanmaa, 33521, Finland

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • primary ACL reconstruction, closed growth plates

Exclusion criteria

  • ligament injury to the opposite knee

Treatment and study plan

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction

Procedure

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Device

MRI sequences were as follows: sagittal T1-weighted, proton density (PD)-weighted and T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap, coronal T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted FSE images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap, axial fat saturated PD FSE images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap and oblique sagittal and oblique coronal T1 FSE images along AM graft plane with 3 mm slice and 0.3 mm gap.

Other names: MRI evaluations were made with a 1.5-T Signa Excite HD imager (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) by use of an eight-channel receiver/transmitter extremity coil., The interpretation of the images was made with the Impax DS 3000 workstation (Agfa HealthCare, Mortsel, Belgium)

Primary outcomes

  1. The location of the ACL grafts in the insertion site in the femur and in the tibia reported as percentages

    Time frame: 2 years after surgery

    The measurements of the graft location from the MRI were made by two musculoskeletal radiologists separately and the means of these measurements were used. In brief, first the centers of the tunnels were measured from sagittal images referring to the Blumensaat's line and to the posterior femoral condyle. Then these were divided with the maximum diameters of the femoral condyle parallel to and perpendicular to the Blumensaat's line. In the tibial side, the centers of the tunnels were measured from the anterior edge of the tibial plateau and then divided with the maximum diameter of the plateau, which was measured from the sagittal view.

  2. The visibility of the ACL grafts measured from the MRI

    Time frame: 2 years after surgery

    Two musculoskeletal radiologists made the interpretation of the images separately and the means of these measurements were used. A graft was considered visible when intact graft fibers were seen. The graft was considered partially visible when only few graft fibers were seen. The graft was considered invisible when no graft fibers were seen.

Secondary outcomes

  1. KT-1000 measurement (mm) of the knees of 61 patients

    Time frame: 2 years after surgery

    KT-1000 measurements were reported as millimeters.

  2. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) functional score

    Time frame: 2 years after surgery

    IKDC functional score was used to evaluate knee functions (IKDC scale: 0-10). Full function without any limitations was scored as 10, while zero indicated that those patients were unable to perform their daily activities.

  3. Lysholm knee evaluation score

    Time frame: 2 years after surgery

    Patients completed the Lysholm knee score, which measures subjective functions e.g. squatting and running. The scale is 0-100, 100 being perfect functioning of the knee.

  4. Clinical evaluation of the knees on the basis of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) examination form

    Time frame: 2 years after surgery

    The clinical evaluation was performed on the basis of IKDC knee examination form, which gives the final score A-D. A being normal, B nearly normal, C abnormal and D severely abnormal.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tampere University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Tunnel Placements on Clinical and MRI Findings Two Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Double-Bundle Technique

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2013
First posted
Dec 4, 2013
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.