Tampere University hospital
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, 33521, Finland
NCT Number: NCT02000258
Purpose: To find out whether the clinical and MRI findings two years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were associated with each other so that MRI-based graft invisibility in the anteromedial (AM) graft would have an impact on anteroposterior stability of the knee, and MRI-based posterolateral (PL) graft invisibility on rotational stability of the knee.
Methods: 75 patients. One experienced orthopaedic surgeon performed all double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructions. Two independent examiners made the clinical examinations at the two-year follow-up: clinical examination of the knee, KT-1000, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee evaluation scores and IKDC functional score. The MRI evaluations were made by two musculoskeletal radiologists separately and the means of these measurements were used.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, 33521, Finland
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
MRI sequences were as follows: sagittal T1-weighted, proton density (PD)-weighted and T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap, coronal T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted FSE images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap, axial fat saturated PD FSE images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap and oblique sagittal and oblique coronal T1 FSE images along AM graft plane with 3 mm slice and 0.3 mm gap.
Other names: MRI evaluations were made with a 1.5-T Signa Excite HD imager (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) by use of an eight-channel receiver/transmitter extremity coil., The interpretation of the images was made with the Impax DS 3000 workstation (Agfa HealthCare, Mortsel, Belgium)
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
The measurements of the graft location from the MRI were made by two musculoskeletal radiologists separately and the means of these measurements were used. In brief, first the centers of the tunnels were measured from sagittal images referring to the Blumensaat's line and to the posterior femoral condyle. Then these were divided with the maximum diameters of the femoral condyle parallel to and perpendicular to the Blumensaat's line. In the tibial side, the centers of the tunnels were measured from the anterior edge of the tibial plateau and then divided with the maximum diameter of the plateau, which was measured from the sagittal view.
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Two musculoskeletal radiologists made the interpretation of the images separately and the means of these measurements were used. A graft was considered visible when intact graft fibers were seen. The graft was considered partially visible when only few graft fibers were seen. The graft was considered invisible when no graft fibers were seen.
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
KT-1000 measurements were reported as millimeters.
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
IKDC functional score was used to evaluate knee functions (IKDC scale: 0-10). Full function without any limitations was scored as 10, while zero indicated that those patients were unable to perform their daily activities.
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Patients completed the Lysholm knee score, which measures subjective functions e.g. squatting and running. The scale is 0-100, 100 being perfect functioning of the knee.
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
The clinical evaluation was performed on the basis of IKDC knee examination form, which gives the final score A-D. A being normal, B nearly normal, C abnormal and D severely abnormal.
Tampere University Hospital
Other
Effect of Tunnel Placements on Clinical and MRI Findings Two Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Double-Bundle Technique
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06769711
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Trabzon, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07555782
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Ataşehir, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07564336
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Graz, Styria, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT05440890
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Málaga, Spain
View Trial Details