Medical University of Graz
Graz, Styria, 8036, Austria
NCT Number: NCT07564336
This study evaluated outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts with a calcaneal bone block, with or without additional InternalBrace augmentation. Revision ACL reconstruction is often more complex than primary ACL reconstruction because previous surgery may leave widened bone tunnels or bone defects. Achilles tendon allografts with attached bone blocks may help address these defects and allow reconstruction in a single surgical procedure.
Participants with MRI-confirmed ACL graft re-tear and clinical knee instability were randomized to undergo revision ACL reconstruction either with InternalBrace augmentation or without InternalBrace augmentation. Clinical outcomes, patient-reported knee function, health-related quality of life, and MRI findings were assessed during 13 months of follow-up. The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled pilot trial to compare whether additional InternalBrace augmentation improved functional, radiographic, or quality-of-life outcomes after revision ACL surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Graz, Styria, 8036, Austria
Anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery remains challenging and may have less predictable outcomes than primary ACL reconstruction. In revision cases, prior bone tunnels and bone defects can complicate graft fixation. Achilles tendon allografts with calcaneal bone blocks provide a reliable graft configuration and may help fill pre-existing bone defects during a one-stage revision procedure. InternalBrace augmentation is intended to provide additional support to the reconstructed ligament during the healing period, but clinical evidence for its use with allograft ACL revision surgery is limited.
This prospective, randomized controlled pilot study enrolled patients from February 2017 to September 2020 at the Medical University of Graz. Eligible participants had MRI-confirmed re-tear of the ACL graft and clinical and patient-reported knee instability. Patients with advanced associated lesions requiring reconstruction or prolonged restricted weight bearing, signs of infection, advanced osteoarthritis, or neuromuscular disease were excluded. For all included participants, the procedure was the first revision surgery on the affected knee. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Graz, and written informed consent was obtained before participation.
All participants underwent revision ACL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with a calcaneal bone block. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either additional InternalBrace augmentation or no InternalBrace augmentation. The InternalBrace group received a non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape fixed separately and independently from the ACL graft. Apart from the additional InternalBrace fixation in one group, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same for all participants.
Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 13 months after surgery. Outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm Knee Questionnaire, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Short Form-36. MRI scans were performed before surgery and 13 months after surgery to assess graft appearance, graft tightness, graft signal, ligament signs at the femoral and tibial tunnel insertions, and tunnel size.
The final analyzed study population included 30 participants, with 16 participants in the InternalBrace group and 14 participants in the non-InternalBrace group. Overall, clinical and patient-reported outcomes improved during follow-up. At the final 13-month follow-up, there were no clinically relevant differences between the InternalBrace and non-InternalBrace groups. Postoperative MRI showed elongated or insufficient ACL allografts in 15 of 30 participants, without significant differences between groups. The study concluded that ACL revision surgery using Achilles tendon allografts with bone blocks resulted in improved clinical outcomes at 13 months, but additional InternalBrace augmentation did not improve objective or subjective outcomes in this pilot trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block. In this group, a non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape InternalBrace was additionally fixed separately and independently from the ACL allograft to support the graft during healing.
Other names: Revision ACL Reconstruction With InternalBrace, ACL Revision Surgery With InternalBrace Augmentation, Achilles Tendon Allograft ACL Revision With Suture Tape Augmentation
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block. No additional InternalBrace or suture tape augmentation was used. Apart from the absence of InternalBrace augmentation, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same as in the InternalBrace augmentation group.
Other names: Revision ACL Reconstruction Without InternalBrace, ACL Revision Surgery Without InternalBrace Augmentation, Achilles Tendon Allograft ACL Revision Without Suture Tape Augmentation
Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The International Knee Documentation Committee score was used to assess patient-reported knee symptoms, function, and sports activity after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Lysholm Knee Questionnaire was used to assess knee symptoms and functional limitations after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Tegner Activity Scale was used to assess participant activity level after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a higher activity level.
Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to assess knee-related pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. Subscale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score was used to assess physical health-related quality of life after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary score was used to assess mental health-related quality of life after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health-related quality of life.
Time frame: 13 months after surgery
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess anterior cruciate ligament allograft tightness. Grafts were categorized as tight, elongated, or insufficient.
Time frame: 13 months after surgery
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure femoral and tibial tunnel size after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tunnel size was measured in millimeters.
Medical University of Graz
Other
Achilles Tendon Allografts With and Without InternalBrace Augmentation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
Acronym: ACL-AlloRev
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03711734
ACL, ACL Injury
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00529958
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03680716
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT03617991
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial Details