Karadeniz Technical University, Orthopedic and Traumatology Department
Trabzon, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06769711
1. Comparison of the grafts using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MR) to determine whether their maturation and bone integration are different, 2. Comparison of the grafts using Computerized Tomography (CT) to determine whether their effects on the tunnels opened in cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries are different, 3. In the event that graft healing and effects on the tunnels differ between grafts, determination of whether these differences are related to patient clinics,
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Trabzon, Turkey (Türkiye)
The project method; Patients who will be operated with 2 different grafts used in anterior cruciate ligament surgeries will be included in 2 different randomized groups of 29 people (hamstring and peroneus groups) determined by obtaining their informed consent before the surgery and then,
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgical procedure using Peroneus Longus for ACL reconstruction.
Surgical procedure using Hamstring tendons for ACL reconstruction.
Time frame: 1 year postoperatively.
Comparison of graft maturation between peroneus longus and hamstring tendon autografts using SNQ values obtained from 1-year postoperative MRI.
Time frame: 1 year postoperatively.
Comparison of graft-bone integration between peroneus longus and hamstring tendon autografts using MRI Grading System obtained from 1-year postoperative MRI.
Time frame: Within 1 week post-surgery and at 1 year post-surgery.
Comparison of tunnel volume changes between peroneus longus and hamstring tendon autografts by measuring tunnel volume via CT imaging performed within the first week and 1 year after surgery.
Time frame: At 1-year follow-up.
Comparison of knee laxity (Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift tests) between groups and correlation with graft healing (SNQ, Tendon bone healing grade) and tunnel expansion.Clinical grading of laxity based on standard examination protocols.
Time frame: At 1-year follow-up.
Comparison of knee function and activity levels between groups using IKDC, Lysholm, and Marx scales and evaluation of correlations with SNQ, Tendon bone healing grade, and tunnel volume changes.Standardized scoring from IKDC, Lysholm, and Marx Activity scales.
Time frame: At 1-year follow-up.
Assessment of whether tunnel volume changes correlate with knee function, activity levels, or laxity test results.Statistical correlation analysis between tunnel volume changes and clinical outcomes.
Time frame: 1 year postoperatively.
Evaluation of whether differences in SNQ, Tendon bone healing grade, or tunnel volume changes are specific to patient demographics or clinical characteristics.
Karadeniz Technical University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07555782
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Ataşehir, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07564336
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Graz, Styria, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT05440890
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Málaga, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07470944
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
View Trial Details