Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07740265

Effect of Scanning Techniques on Accuracy of Mandibular Fixed Detachable Prostheses

This crossover clinical study aims to evaluate the influence of three different intraoral scanning techniques on the scanning accuracy and passive fit of mandibular implant-supported fixed detachable prostheses in completely edentulous patients. Each participant will undergo digital implant scanning using three methods: splinted scan bodies, horizontal non-calibrated scan bodies (IO Connect), and auxiliary geometric devices.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University

Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, 31527, Egypt

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Mostafa Hamed Mostafa Abd El-Hameed

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201090461713

Mostafa Hamed Mostafa Abd El-Hameed, BDS, MSc

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This prospective crossover clinical trial is designed to evaluate and compare the accuracy and passive fit of three different intraoral scanning techniques used for the fabrication of mandibular implant-supported fixed detachable prostheses in completely edentulous patients.

The study will include completely edentulous participants rehabilitated with four osseointegrated implants placed in the mandibular arch. Each participant will undergo digital implant impression procedures using three different scanning .

The three scanning techniques being compared are:

  • Splinted Scan Bodies: Implant scan bodies will be splinted using composite resin before intraoral scanning.
  • Horizontal Non-Calibrated Scan Bodies (IO Connect): Digital impressions will be obtained using the IO Connect horizontal scan body system.
  • Auxiliary Geometric Devices: Digital impressions will be acquired using 3D-printed auxiliary geometric devices attached to the scan bodies to provide additional geometric reference landmarks during scanning.

Digital datasets generated from each scanning technique will be analyzed and compared. Verification jigs will be fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and clinically evaluated.

The primary outcomes of the study are scanning accuracy, assessed by measuring linear deviation (µm) and angular deviation (degrees) between implant positions obtained from the different scanning techniques, and three-dimensional surface deviation analysis, assessed through root mean square (RMS) values and median surface deviation obtained from STL file superimposition.

The secondary outcome is passive fit , which will be evaluated using the Sheffield one-screw test and intraoral periapical radiographic assessment.

The findings of this study will help identify the scanning technique that provides the highest accuracy and best passive fit for mandibular implant-supported fixed detachable prostheses and may contribute to improving digital workflows in complete-arch implant rehabilitation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Completely edentulous patients with age between 40-60 years.
  • Adequate bone height to fulfill the criteria for implant placement.
  • Patients should have a class I Angle's classification.

Exclusion criteria

1-. Insufficient vertical inter-arch space to accommodate the restorative components.

  • Presence of psychiatric or neurological conditions. 3. Any systemic diseases that may affect implant bone osteointegration.

Treatment and study plan

Splinted Scan Body with composite

Device

A full-arch digital implant impression will be obtained using implant scan bodies splinted with composite resin prior to scanning. The splinting procedure will provide enhanced scan body stability and will be used to minimize positional discrepancies during digital impression acquisition.

IO Connect Scanning Technique

Device

A full-arch digital implant impression will be obtained using horizontal non-calibrated scan bodies (IO Connect). The horizontal scan body design will facilitate implant position recognition, digital alignment, and accurate transfer of implant coordinates throughout the digital impression procedure.

Auxiliary Geometric Device Scanning Technique

Device

A full-arch digital implant impression will be obtained using 3D-printed auxiliary geometric devices attached to implant scan bodies. These auxiliary devices will provide additional geometric reference landmarks to improve stitching accuracy, reduce cumulative scanning errors, and enhance complete-arch digital impression accuracy.

Primary outcomes

  1. Implant linear and angular deviation

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of digital scanning day 0

    The linear and angular deviations of implants will be compared and analyzed across different scanning techniques against each other

  2. Three-Dimensional part comparison

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of digital scanning day 0

    Three-dimensional surface deviation will be evaluated by uploading all STL files to dedicated comparison software. Digital superimposition will be performed to calculate the median surface deviation and root mean square (RMS) values between the datasets, providing a quantitative assessment of surface discrepancies among the three scanning techniques.

Secondary outcomes

  1. fit of verification jig

    Time frame: Within 1 hour of fabrication and intraoral placement of the verification jig

    Passive fit will be evaluated clinically using the Sheffield one-screw test and confirmed by intraoral periapical radiographs.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mostafa Hamed Mostafa Abd El-Hameed Abd El-Hameed, BDS, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201090461713

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tanta University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Influence of Three Different Scanning Techniques on Scanning Accuracy for Mandibular Fixed Detachable Prosthesis (A Cross Over Study).

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 31, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 31, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.