Federal University of Minas Gerais, Dental School
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT07310979
This prospective clinical study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a novel triple-abutment system with hyperbolic paraboloid geometry installed on Morse taper dental implants. The system is designed to support three adjacent crowns on a single implant, aiming to optimize load distribution and preserve peri-implant tissue stability.
Thirty systemically healthy adults missing three adjacent teeth will undergo implant placement, followed by a healing period of approximately three months for osseointegration prior to prosthetic loading. Metal-ceramic restorations will then be cemented over triple abutments. Clinical and radiographic evaluations will be performed at T1 (3-4 months after prosthetic loading) and T2 (12-18 months after prosthetic loading).
The primary outcome will be marginal bone level change assessed by standardized periapical radiographs. Secondary outcomes include probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, keratinized mucosa height, and patient-reported satisfaction. The study aims to investigate whether this innovative abutment design provides stable peri-implant conditions and favorable clinical performance when applied to Morse taper implants.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil
This prospective clinical study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of an innovative triple-abutment (TA) system with hyperbolic paraboloid geometry installed on Morse taper dental implants. The abutment system is designed to support three adjacent crowns on a single implant through a fully curved, passive, non-welded configuration, with the objective of optimizing biomechanical load distribution and preserving peri-implant tissue stability. The concept is based on principles of mechanobiology, mechanotransduction, and biotensegrity, integrated within the framework of Optimized Biodynamic Peri-Implant Tissue (BOPiT).
Thirty systemically healthy adult participants presenting with three adjacent missing teeth will be enrolled. Implant placement will be performed following conventional surgical protocols. After surgery, a healing period of approximately three months will be allowed to achieve osseointegration prior to prosthetic loading. Subsequently, metal-ceramic fixed prostheses will be cemented over triple-abutment components. All surgical and prosthetic procedures will be conducted by a single experienced operator to ensure standardization.
Clinical and radiographic evaluations will be performed at two predefined follow-up timepoints: T1, corresponding to 3-4 months after prosthetic loading, and T2, corresponding to 12-18 months after prosthetic loading. The primary outcome measure will be marginal bone level change, assessed on standardized periapical radiographs obtained using the parallel technique with controlled calibration, and measured at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant.
Secondary outcome measures will include probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, keratinized mucosa height, and patient-reported satisfaction assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Clinical maintenance visits will be scheduled every four months between T1 and T2 to monitor peri-implant health and prosthetic performance.
Statistical analyses will be conducted using parametric methods appropriate for repeated measures, with strategies to account for potential within-subject correlation in participants receiving more than one implant. Adverse events and biological or prosthetic complications will be recorded throughout the study period. The risks associated with participation are minimal and comparable to those of conventional implant-supported rehabilitations. In the event of complications, the triple-abutment system may be replaced by conventional abutments according to clinical judgment.
This study seeks to provide clinical evidence regarding the biomechanical and biological behavior of the triple-abutment system when applied to Morse taper implants, potentially supporting a more conservative and cost-effective rehabilitative approach by enabling the restoration of three adjacent teeth with a single implant while maintaining peri-implant tissue stability.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prosthetic loading will be performed on osseointegrated morse taper dental implants using a fixed implant-supported rehabilitation with a triple-abutment system featuring hyperbolic paraboloid geometry. Metal-ceramic prostheses will be cemented over the abutment components. All procedures will be performed by a single operator.
Time frame: baseline vs. 3 months
Marginal bone level measured in millimeters at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant using standardized periapical radiographs with the parallel technique and calibrated measurements, assessed at T1 (3-4 months)
Time frame: baseline vs. 12-18 months after prosthetic loading
Marginal bone level measured in millimeters at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant using standardized periapical radiographs, assessed to evaluate medium-term peri-implant bone stability (12-18 months).
Time frame: baseline versus 3-4 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Probing depth measured in millimeters at six sites per implant using a standardized periodontal probe.
Time frame: baseline versus 12-18 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Probing depth measured in millimeters at six sites per implant using a standardized periodontal probe.
Time frame: baseline versus 3-4 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Presence or absence of bleeding on probing assessed at six peri-implant sites per implant and expressed as the percentage of sites with bleeding.
Time frame: baseline versus 12-18 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Presence or absence of bleeding on probing assessed at six peri-implant sites per implant and expressed as the percentage of sites with bleeding.
Time frame: baseline versus 3-4 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Presence of dental plaque assessed at peri-implant sites and expressed as the percentage of sites with visible plaque.
Time frame: baseline versus 12-18 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Presence of dental plaque assessed at peri-implant sites and expressed as the percentage of sites with visible plaque.
Time frame: baseline versus 3-4 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Width of keratinized peri-implant mucosa measured in millimeters at the mid-buccal aspect of each implant.
Time frame: baseline versus 12-18 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Width of keratinized peri-implant mucosa measured in millimeters at the mid-buccal aspect of each implant.
Time frame: baseline versus 3-4 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Patient-reported satisfaction with the implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation assessed using a visual analog (VAS) scale. VAS ranging from 0 to 10; 10 indicates a complete satisfaction score.
Time frame: baseline versus 12-18 months (T2) after prosthetic loading
Patient-reported satisfaction with the implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation assessed using a visual analog (VAS) scale. VAS ranging from 0 to 10; 10 indicates a complete satisfaction score.
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Other
Biomechanical and Clinical Effects of a Hyperbolic Paraboloid Triple-Abutment System on Morse Taper Dental Implants: Prospective Clinical Study With Finite Element Corroboration
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06647381
Dental Implants
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06643468
Dental Implants, Immediate Implant Soft Tissue Healing
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07346391
Dental Implants
HỒ CHÍ MINH, VIỆT NAM, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT05722041
Dental Implants, Immediate Dental Implant Placement
Alicante, Spain
View Trial Details