Tel Aviv Medical Center
Tel Aviv, Israel
NCT Number: NCT06644859
The goal of this study is to understand if specific gait and activity measures can help predict injurious falls in older women. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Can combining daily gait (DLG) and daily physical activity (DLPA) measures more accurately predict the risk of injurious falls? How effective is wearable technology and machine learning in analyzing these activity measures for fall prediction? Researchers will analyze data from the Women's Health Study (WHS), using wearable technology to track daily walking patterns and physical activity, and apply machine learning to assess the likelihood of harmful falls.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me45 year and older
Female
Observational
Tel Aviv, Israel
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This intervention uniquely focuses on the prediction of injurious falls by combining daily life gait (DLG) measures (e.g., gait speed, cadence, variability) with daily life physical activity (DLPA) measures (e.g., activity levels, activity fragmentation). Unlike other studies, this analysis leverages data from a large cohort of older women (n=17,466) enrolled in the Women's Health Study (WHS), where participants wore a tri-axial accelerometer for 1 week. Additionally, the study links accelerometer data to long-term health outcomes, specifically fall-related injuries from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) records. This is the first study to explore whether combining DLG and DLPA measures, derived from wearable technology, can predict fall-related injuries in an aging population, applying advanced machine learning techniques to this large, anonymized dataset.
Time frame: njurious falls within 1 year after baseline assessment using time-to-event analyses.
The study will evaluate the association between gait speed (measured in meters per second) and the risk of injurious falls within one year following the accelerometer assessment.
Time frame: Injurious falls within 1 year after baseline assessment using time-to-event analyses.
The study will assess the association between cadence (measured in steps per minute) and the risk of injurious falls within one year following the accelerometer assessment.
Time frame: Time Frame: Injurious falls within 1 year after baseline assessment using time-to-event analyses.
The study will assess the association between gait variability (measured as the standard deviation of step times) and the risk of injurious falls within one year following the accelerometer assessment.
Time frame: Injurious falls within 1 year after baseline assessment using time-to-event analyses
The study will evaluate the association between overall activity levels (measured in average accelerometer counts per minute) and the risk of injurious falls within one year following the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Injurious falls within 1 year after baseline assessment using time-to-event analyses.
The study will assess the association between activity fragmentation (measured by the fragmentation index) and the risk of injurious falls within one year following the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Time Frame: Injurious falls within 1 year after baseline assessment, using combined predictive models.
his outcome will evaluate a single combined score derived from both daily life gait (DLG) and daily life physical activity (DLPA) measures to assess the association with the risk of injurious falls. The combined score will be created incorporating DLG measures (e.g., gait speed, variability) and DLPA measures (e.g., overall activity levels, fragmentation) into a unified predictor.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline (self-reported exercise history) and at the time of accelerometer data collection, with data analyzed within 1 year of the baseline assessment.
This outcome will assess whether participants' self-reported exercise history is associated with gait speed (measured in meters per second) derived from accelerometer data.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline (self-reported exercise history) and at the time of accelerometer data collection, with data analyzed within 1 year of the baseline assessment
This outcome will evaluate whether participants' self-reported exercise history is associated with gait variability (measured as the standard deviation of step times) derived from accelerometer data.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline (self-reported exercise history) and at the time of accelerometer data collection, with data analyzed within 1 year of the baseline assessment
This outcome will assess whether participants' self-reported exercise history is associated with overall activity levels (measured in accelerometer counts per minute) derived from accelerometer data.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline (self-reported exercise history) and at the time of accelerometer data collection, with data analyzed within 1 year of the baseline assessment
his outcome will evaluate whether participants' self-reported exercise history is associated with activity fragmentation (measured by the fragmentation index) derived from accelerometer data.
Time frame: 5 years after baseline.
This outcome will assess whether gait speed (measured in meters per second) is associated with the risk of injurious falls over a 5-year follow-up period.
Time frame: 5 years after baseline.
This outcome will assess whether gait variability (measured as the standard deviation of step times) is associated with the risk of injurious falls over a 5-year follow-up period.
Time frame: 5 years after baseline.
This outcome will evaluate whether overall activity levels (measured in accelerometer counts per minute) are associated with the risk of injurious falls over a 5-year follow-up period.
Time frame: 5 years after baseline.
This outcome will assess whether activity fragmentation (measured by the fragmentation index) is associated with the risk of injurious falls over a 5-year follow-up period.
Time frame: Based on 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year fall risk prediction models
Using machine learning and statistical techniques, the study will identify potential "signatures" combining DLG and DLPA measures to identify older adults at high risk of injurious falls. These signatures could inform early fall prevention strategies.
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Other Gov
Data Analysis to Evaluate Which Specific Gait Measures Are Associated with Risk of Injurious Falls
Acronym: WHS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06759805
Adherence, Medication, Adherence, Treatment
Bergen, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05057546
Aging, Estrogen Deficiency
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07705724
Body Weight, Menopause
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07674680
Aging, Menopause
Columbia, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details