North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust
Carlisle, CA2 7HY, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03431662
The purpose of this study is to assess whether there is a difference between the TomoFix and Ellipse Intramedullary HTO Nail System in terms of bone regeneration in the tibial wedge by performing a CT-scan at 3 and 6-months postoperatively.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Carlisle, CA2 7HY, United Kingdom
Malalignment of the knee joint causes arthritis in later life. Currently there are three surgical ways to treat knee arthritis: total knee replacement, partial knee replacement, and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The former two very much focus on treating the effect of malalignment, i.e. removing the arthritic joint. However, HTO addresses the cause of the arthritis, namely the joint malalignment. This preserves the patient's joint and it means that a patient will start using the unaffected part of the knee joint more.
HTO involves cutting a wedge out the tibia to correct the alignment of that bone with the knee joint, to redistribute load from the affected medial part to lateral part. To keep the tibia in the new position, a medical nail device is attached to keep it in place and allow new bone to regenerate within the wedge. Currently, the market leader for HTO is the TomoFix (by DePuySynthes company) plate and nail device. As the name suggests, TomoFix is fixed at surgery and therefore the change in bone angle cannot be changed afterwards. It does mean that patients can be weight-bearing on the affected leg soon after the HTO procedure. A new CE-marked device is being tested in an interventional trial; it is produced by Ellipse Technologies. This device is an extendable nail and inserted intramedullary; following surgery the nail is tend slowly extended over a period of time until the bone correction is satisfactory.
The CISKO imaging study will assess whether there is a difference between the TomoFix and Ellipse system in terms of bone regeneration in the tibial wedge by performing a CT-scan at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. This will be quantified by two independent radiological reports. A secondary objective is to investigate patient satisfaction and also patient pain levels at these time intervals. The degree of bone healing is usually the main factor holding clinicians back when it comes to advising patients on what activities they can return to post-operatively. A difference in bone healing between the two systems may impact on the advice clinicians can give patients regarding recommencing more intense activities such as recreational sports, which ultimately could positively impact patients' health and well-being.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A CT scan will be performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively to assess the healing of the osteotomy site. Endpoint is 6 months.
Other names: Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan
A CT scan will be performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively to assess the healing of the osteotomy site. Endpoint is 6 months.
Other names: Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan
Time frame: 6-month postoperative
Healing of the osteotomy site after final correction as assessed by two independent radiology reports based on visual assessment of the CT imaging. The scoring system is derived from a study by Brosset and colleagues (Brosset et al, 2011). In addition to a pure clinician perspective of the healing process, CT imaging data will also be used to quantify and describe:
Time frame: 6-month postoperative
A patient reported outcome of their perception of pain
Time frame: 6-month postoperative
A patient reported outcome of the patient's perception of satisfaction with treatment
Time frame: 6-month postoperative
A validated patient reported outcome.
Time frame: 6-month postoperative
A validated patient reported outcome.
Ellipse Technologies, Inc.
Industry
Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Study of Bone Healing Following Open Wedge
Acronym: CISKO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02519218
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT02412163
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Hanover, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02108496
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07720024
Arthritis, Blount disease
Pathum Thani, Changwat Pathum Thani, Thailand
View Trial Details