Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04819425

"Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Endotracheal Tubes in Intensive Care : Elastic Adhesive Strips vs Lace In A Protective Sheath."

Every year, in France, nearly 100,000 patients hospitalized in intensive care more than 48 hours require invasive respiratory assistance via an endotracheal tube.

Appropriate tube fixation is essential to ensure effective ventilation while minimizing potential complications such as accidental extubations. However, the fixation system chosen may lead to peribuccal lesions such as bedsores, shearing or cutaneous-mucous tear. These lesions are painful for patients and often unsightly as scar may remain.

There are no formal recommendations for the use of any type of fixing system. Thus, systems used to secure the endotracheal tube vary from one ICU to another.

The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the fixing strategy by elastic adhesive tape reduces the risk of developing a peribuccal lesion during the time of the endotracheal tube's maintenance.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier d'Angoulême, Angoulême, France

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit
  • Age over 18
  • Intubation for estimated duration > 48h
  • Patient treated with vasopressors
  • Patient or relative who received the information and are not opposed to study participation or patient included under the emergency procedure in the absence of contactable family members.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pre-existing face lesions at ICU admission along the path of the endotracheal tube fixing.
  • Admitted patient already intubated upon transfer from another ICU
  • Nasotracheal intubation
  • Patient in isolation for suspected COVID or clinically proven COVID
  • Admitted tracheotomized patient
  • Pregnant, nursing, parturient woman
  • Lack of social security affiliation
  • Moribund
  • Incapable major (under guardianship, curatorship)
  • Patient deprived of liberty by court order

Treatment and study plan

Elastic Adhesive Strips

Device

Securement of Endotracheal tube with Elastic Adhesive Strips

Lace in A Protective Sheath

Device

Securement of Endotracheal tube with Lace in A Protective Sheath

Primary outcomes

  1. Peribuccal lesion

    Time frame: up to 10 days after intubation

    Appearance of at least one peribuccal lesion during the first 10 days of maintaining the endotracheal tube inserted orally.

    Presence of peribuccal lesion will be validated on picture by an independent review committee.

    The picture will be taken daily without the visible fixing system (blind maintained for the adjudication committee) from J0 to J10 at the site of the endotracheal tube.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee

Other

Registry information

Official study title

"Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Endotracheal Tubes in Intensive Care : Elastic Adhesive Strips vs Lace In A Protective Sheath. A Randomized Multicenter, Cluster and Crossover Controlled Study. FIXATUB"

Acronym: FIXATUB

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Mar 29, 2021
Registry last updated
Nov 22, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.