Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00151112

Comparison of Two Different Procedures for Plexus Anesthesia

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of difference positioning on extension and efficacy of brachial plexus anesthesia at 20 minutes by using the axillary plexus block with supine positioning and a lateral positioning onto the non-anaesthetized side, combined with 20° Trendelenburg positioning.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

BG Unfallklinik Murnau; Department of Anesthesiology, Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Single shot axillary block

Exclusion criteria

  • Lateral position not possible

Treatment and study plan

Positioning and plexus anesthesia

Procedure

positioning during plexus anesthesia

Primary outcomes

  1. Extent of anesthesia

    Time frame: 20 minutes after acillary plexus block

  2. Efficacy of anesthesia

    Time frame: 20 minutes after axillary plexus block

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of failure

    Time frame: 20 minutes after axillary plexus block

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Muenster

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Two Different Procedures for Plexus Anesthesia: Standard Position Versus Combination of Lateral Position and 20° Trendelenburg Position

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Sep 8, 2005
Registry last updated
Sep 11, 2008

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.