Mersin University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Mersin, 33150, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07383636
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of manual and powered toothbrushes in removing dental plaque in patients undergoing clear aligner orthodontic treatment.
Clear aligner treatment uses attachments bonded to teeth to facilitate tooth movement. These attachments may increase plaque accumulation around the tooth surface. Poor plaque control can lead to dental caries and periodontal problems.
In this study, patients receiving clear aligner treatment will brush their teeth using either a manual or a powered toothbrush. Dental plaque levels around attachments will be evaluated before and after brushing using a modified plaque index.
The results of this study may help determine whether one type of toothbrush is more effective than the other in maintaining oral hygiene during clear aligner therapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Mersin, 33150, Turkey (Türkiye)
Dental plaque is a complex biofilm and a primary etiological factor in the development of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Orthodontic treatments may increase plaque accumulation due to the presence of attachments bonded to the tooth surface.
Clear aligner therapy has become increasingly popular due to its esthetic and removable nature. However, attachments used during treatment may compromise oral hygiene by promoting plaque retention, particularly in the gingival region.
This study is designed to evaluate and compare the plaque removal effectiveness of manual and powered toothbrushes in patients undergoing clear aligner orthodontic treatment.
A total of 14 patients receiving clear aligner therapy will be randomly assigned to either a manual toothbrush group or a powered toothbrush group. Dental plaque accumulation around attachments will be assessed before brushing (T0) and after a standardized two-minute brushing period (T1) using the Modified Plaque Index adapted for orthodontic patients.
Plaque scores will be evaluated at multiple tooth surfaces (mesial, distal, occlusal, and gingival) and analyzed both on a patient-based and tooth-based level. Attachments will also be categorized as conventional or optimized, and plaque reduction will be compared between attachment types.
The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of different toothbrush types in maintaining oral hygiene in patients treated with clear aligners.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Use of a manual toothbrush for plaque removal in patients undergoing clear aligner therapy.
Other names: TePe Select™ Medium
Use of a powered toothbrush for plaque removal in patients undergoing clear aligner therapy.
Other names: Oral-B iO 9, Electric toothbrush
Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after a single 2-minute toothbrushing session
The primary outcome is the change in dental plaque accumulation measured using the Modified Plaque Index (MPI). Plaque scores will be recorded immediately before toothbrushing (T0) and immediately after a standardized 2-minute toothbrushing session (T1). The difference between T0 and T1 MPI scores will be calculated to assess plaque removal effectiveness.
Mersin University
Other
Comparison of the Plaque Removal Efficacy of Manual and Powered Toothbrushes in Patients Undergoing Clear Aligner Therapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07382310
Chewing Gum, Dental Deposits
Sydney, New South Wales, Central, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06984744
Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06779279
Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque
Ajman, United Arab Emirates
View Trial DetailsNCT07584512
Dental Plaque Accumulation, Oral Hygiene Education
Dhaka, Bangladesh
View Trial Details