Sydney Dental Hospital (SDH)
Sydney, New South Wales, Central, 2010, Australia
NCT Number: NCT07382310
The goal of this clinical trial is to test if the additional use of different commercially available products for a better breath and plaque reduction, taken during daytime between morning and evening tooth brushing, can reduce the plaque formation of participants during the day.
The tested products were:
* Listerine Total Care mouth rinse without alcohol. * Oral B Pro-Health Multi-Protection Mouth Rinse refreshing mint without alcohol. * Colgate total advanced pro-shield mouth rinse without alcohol. * Listerine Go Tabs. * Wrigley Extra White Soft Chew Peppermint chewing gum.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Can the tested product lower the plaque formation? Can the tested product improve the mouth freshness and breath?
Researchers will compare the tested products to not using any product (controls).
Participants need to come for a screening appointment and sign a consent form at first. If they are eligible, they need to come 6 times to the clinic. On each day, they need to come twice (morning appointment at 8 a.m. and evening appointment at 4 p.m.).
In the morning, they will have teeth cleaning and recieve one of the tested products to use on that day only (after tea break and lunch break), or they will recieve no product (control day).
In the evening, participant's teeth will be stained and oral photos will be taken. They will be asked about their perciption of freshness and good breath after using the product.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sydney, New South Wales, Central, 2010, Australia
Sample size, study location, and target population:
By using t-test and assuming a pooled standard deviation of 0.35 units, the study required a sample size of 15 participants in total, to achieve a 90% power and 1% level of significance (P<0.05), for detecting a true difference in means between the test and the control group of 0.5 on RMNPI index (Cugini et al 2006). This study is a cross-over study. In other words, participants were their own controls. Therefore, a total number of twenty participants were included in the study (10 males and 10 females).
The staff members of Sydney Dental Hospital were contacted by email to participate in the study. A screening appointment was arranged for interested participants to check for the eligibility criteria.
Study protocol:
One examiner (L.B) examined all participants two or three days a week. One participant was assessed per day. All eligible participants attended the Sydney Dental Hospital for 6 days. On each day, each participant was given a product to use on that day only according to the participant's own randomization list of products. If the day was a control day according to the participant's specific sheet, the participant did not receive anything. Then, the date was documented on each subject's own sheet. A minimum of 3 days wash out period was allowed between experimental days.
The following procedures were performed on each day:
On the control day (no products were used on that day): participants attended one morning appointment (at 8 a.m.) and one evening appointment (at 4 p.m.). Each appointment was about 45 min long.
On the other test days (participants received one test product on each day to use for that day only): similar to the control day, participants had to attend one morning appointment (at 8 a.m.) and one evening appointment (at 4 p.m.). Each appointment was about 45 min long.
After all participants completed their visits, all photos were assessed to score RMNPI. All data were recorded on an excel sheet that was used to perform the statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis:
Statistical Analysis was conducted using SAS OnDemand for Academics (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Data was checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test. As data proved non-homogeneous and not-normally distributed, Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare medians between groups (pair-wise), and Kruskal Wallis test for multiple groups comparisons. Pair-wise comparisons of significant differences in Kruskal Wallis test were made using the rank-transformed data using Tukey's adjustment to control for type I error. The results in tables are presented as Medians (95% confidence interval). Any differences were considered significant at P<0.05.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants need to use the mouth wash twice a day (after tea break and after lunch break) according to manifacturer instructions: vigorously swish 20mL of rinse in your mouth for 30 seconds and then spit out. Do not swallow. Do not dilute. They were dispensed in their original bottles. Participants were given a marked cup to measure the amount of MW.
Participants need to use the mouth wash twice a day (after tea break and after lunch break) according to manifacturer instructions: vigorously swish 20mL of rinse in your mouth for 30 seconds and then spit out. Do not swallow. Do not dilute. They were dispensed in their original bottles. Participants were given a marked cup to measure the amount of MW.
Participants need to use the mouth wash twice a day (after tea break and after lunch break) according to manifacturer instructions: vigorously swish 20mL of rinse in your mouth for 30 seconds and then spit out. Do not swallow. Do not dilute. They were dispensed in their original bottles. Participants were given a marked cup to measure the amount of MW.
Participants need to use the tablet twice a day (after tea break and after lunch break) according to manifacturer instructions: chew for 10 seconds to activate, swish around the teeth for 30 seconds to clean then swallow.
Participants need to use the chewing gum twice a day (after tea break and after lunch break) for 10 minutes duration.
Time frame: At the end of each test day (6 days)
Plaque accumulation assessed using the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) on designated tooth surfaces in the sides assigned to interdental brush and water flosser. The tooth was divided into multiple zones as the following :
Whole mouth: areas A,B,C,D,E,F,G and H. Marginal (gum line): areas A,B and C. Interproximal: areas D and F
0 score was given the area where there is no plaque.
1 score was given in the area where there is plaque The minimum plaque score per surface (buccal or lingual) is zero, and the maximum plaque score per surface is 8 Intraoral photos using professional camera were taken for all teeth and all surfaces to record the plaque score.
Time frame: The VAS was reported by the patients at the end of the assessment day (6 days)
The perception of cleanness, freshness, and good breath was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 - 10 (0 - being no clean feeling, no freshness or good breath. 10 - feeling of a very clean and fresh mouth with a good breath).
King Abdullah University Hospital
Other
Effect of Different Products to Support Plaque Control During Daytime: a Cross-over Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07351370
Chlorhexidine, Dental Deposits
Athens, Attica, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT07356869
Children, Dental Deposits
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07737626
Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07725276
Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque
Beirut, Rue de Damas, Lebanon
View Trial Details