Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department Of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Ankara, Turkiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07141485
This prospective observational study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Paediatric Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification (PeDiAC) and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in evaluating difficult tracheal intubation in pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years. Patients undergoing general anesthesia with videolaryngoscopic intubation will be assessed using both scoring systems. The study seeks to determine which system more accurately reflects the difficulty of intubation and serves as a better guide for future anesthetic management, ultimately contributing to improved patient safety.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me0 year–5 year
All sexes
Observational
Ankara, Turkiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
This prospective observational study aims to compare the effectiveness of two scoring systems-Paediatric Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification (PeDiAC) and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)-in assessing the difficulty of tracheal intubation in pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years. Pediatric patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia will be included in the study. All intubations will be performed using a C-MAC videolaryngoscope.
Demographic data such as age, sex, weight, height, ASA physical status, and comorbidities will be recorded. Intraoperative monitoring parameters including peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and heart rate will also be documented. During intubation, the glottic view will be graded according to the Modified Cormack-Lehane classification.
Additional variables-including the time required to achieve optimal glottic visualization, total intubation time (from insertion of the device to cuff inflation), number of intubation attempts, and any complications (e.g., desaturation, mucosal bleeding)-will be noted.
Following intubation, both the intubating anesthesiologist and an independent observer will assign a subjective difficulty score using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (extremely easy) to 10 (impossible). Subsequently, PeDiAC and IDS scores will be calculated for each case.
The primary objective is to determine which of the two scoring systems more accurately reflects the actual difficulty of tracheal intubation in this age group and to identify the one that may better guide future airway management strategies-ultimately aiming to improve safety and clinical outcomes in pediatric anesthesia.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Eligible participants will be pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years who are undergoing general anesthesia for any surgical procedure. All included patients must undergo tracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope (C-MAC). Patients must have an ASA physical status classification of I to IV and written informed consent must be obtained from a parent or legal guardian prior to participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Immediately after tracheal intubation
This outcome measure evaluates the effectiveness of two scoring systems-PeDiAC and Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)-in reflecting the difficulty of tracheal intubation in pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years. Both scores will be calculated for each patient immediately after intubation. The correlation between each score and the actual intubation experience will be statistically analyzed to determine which scoring system better predicts intubation difficulty.
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Other
Comparison of the PeDiAC Score and Intubation Difficulty Scale in Pediatric Patients Aged 0-5 Years Undergoing Tracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy
Acronym: VIDEOPED
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07484841
Airway Management Assessment, Awake Endotracheal Intubation
İzmit, Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07245511
Difficult Airway Intubation, Intubation Difficulty Scale
Ankara, Turkiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06401486
Anesthesia, Intubation Complication
A Coruña, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05968781
Intubation; Difficult or Failed, Videolaryngoscopy
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details