Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07245511

Comparison of VIDIAC, PeDiAC and Intubation Difficulty Scale in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Videolaryngoscopic Intubation

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate three scoring systems (VIDIAC (Video Laryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification), PeDiAC (Pediatric Difficult Airway Classification), and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)).

A total of 450 children undergoing general anesthesia with videolaryngoscopic intubation will be included in the study. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, and glottic imaging, as well as detailed intubation-related variables such as total intubation time, number of attempts, complications, and subjective intubation ease scores will be recorded.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

5 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department Of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Ankara, Turkiye, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

GOZDE IREM DEMIRCI GOKCE

CONTACT

About this study

This study is a prospective, observational, single-center study designed to compare three difficult intubation scales (VIDIAC [Video Laryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification], PeDiAC [Pediatric Difficult Airway Classification], and the Intubation Difficulty Scale [IDS]).

A total of 450 children undergoing elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital will be included in the study. All tracheal intubations will be performed using a C-MAC videolaryngoscope with an endotracheal tube appropriate for the child's age, weight, and surgical indication. No procedures beyond routine clinical practice will be performed, and informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians prior to inclusion in the study.

Data collection will include demographic characteristics (age, gender, weight, height, ASA classification, comorbidities), intraoperative parameters (SpO₂, heart rate), and intubation-related variables: Glottic view graded using the modified Cormack-Lehane classification, time required for glottic visualization, total intubation time, number of attempts, use of adjuncts (stylet, bougie, alternative tubes), complications (desaturation, esophageal intubation, mucosal bleeding, tooth or lip trauma).

This study will evaluate difficult tracheal intubation in pediatric patients aged 5 to 18 years. Three difficult intubations The difficulty of intubation will be rated subjectively (0 = extremely easy, 10 = impossible) by the anesthesiologist performing the intubation and independently by an observer.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Eligible participants will be pediatric patients aged 5 to 18 years who are undergoing general anesthesia for any surgical procedure. All included patients must undergo tracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope (C-MAC). Patients must have an ASA physical status classification of I to IV and written informed consent must be obtained from a parent or legal guardian prior to participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pediatric patients between 5 and 18 years of age
  • Undergoing general anesthesia for any type of surgical procedure
  • ASA physical status classification I to IV
  • Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing awake fiberoptic intubation
  • History of tracheal resection or reconstruction surgery
  • Refusal to participate or absence of informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of VIDIAC, PeDiAC, and IDS Scores in the Evaluation of Difficult Intubation in Children

    Time frame: Immediately after tracheal intubation

    For each patient, VIDIAC, PeDiAC, and Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) scores will be calculated immediately after tracheal intubation via videolaryngoscopy. These scores will be statistically analyzed to determine the correlation between the number of intubation attempts, intubation time, complications, and subjective intubation ease ratings, in order to identify the scoring system that provides the most reliable assessment of difficult intubation in children.

  2. A Prospective Observational Study Comparing VIDIAC, PeDiAC, and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in Assessing Difficult Intubation in Pediatric Patients Aged 5-18 Years Undergoing Tracheal Intubation with Videolaryngoscopy

    Time frame: Immediately after tracheal intubation

    For each patient, VIDIAC, PeDiAC, and Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) scores will be calculated immediately after tracheal intubation via videolaryngoscopy. These scores will be statistically analyzed to determine the correlation between the number of intubation attempts, intubation time, complications, and subjective intubation ease ratings, in order to identify the scoring system that provides the most reliable assessment of difficult intubation in children.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

GÖZDE İREM DEMİRCİ GÖKÇE, Resident Doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905302488966

SENGÜL ÖZMERT, Assoc. Prof. MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905323861201

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Observational Study Comparing the VIDIAC, PeDiAC, and Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in Pediatric Patients Aged 5-18 Years Undergoing Tracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy

Acronym: VIDIPEDIDS

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.