Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05968781

Predictive Factors for Successful Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Without Stylet

The investigators aimed to evaluate the predictive factors for successful videolaryngoscopic intubation without stylet.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, South Korea

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 19 years and older
  • Patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery and requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with suspected cervical spine injury
  • Patients requiring rapid sequence induction and intubation.
  • Patients with airway disorders
  • Body Mass Index > 35 kg/m2
  • Patients with a history of difficult intubation or, based on clinical judgment, anticipated difficult intubation

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. First-pass success rate of videolaryngoscopic intubation without stylet

    Time frame: From the start of endotracheal intubation to 120 seconds

    An intubation attempt is defined as passing the laryngoscope blade between the patient's teeth. Duration of endotracheal intubation is defined from the moment the operator grasps the tube until the black line on the tube passes through the vocal cords

Secondary outcomes

  1. Success rate of videolaryngoscopic intubation without stylet using BURP maneuver after failure of the first attempt

    Time frame: From the start of endotracheal intubation to 120 seconds

    An intubation attempt is defined as passing the laryngoscope blade between the patient's teeth. Duration of endotracheal intubation is defined from the moment the operator grasps the tube until the black line on the tube passes through the vocal cords

  2. Incidence of using a stylet for the success of videolaryngoscopic intubation after the failure of the second attempt using the BURP maneuver

    Time frame: From the start of endotracheal intubation to 120 seconds

    An intubation attempt is defined as passing the laryngoscope blade between the patient's teeth. Duration of endotracheal intubation is defined from the moment the operator grasps the tube until the black line on the tube passes through the vocal cords

  3. Incidence of successful endotracheal intubation after the failure of the third attempt using stylet

    Time frame: From the start of endotracheal intubation to 120 seconds

    An intubation attempt is defined as passing the laryngoscope blade between the patient's teeth. Duration of endotracheal intubation is defined from the moment the operator grasps the tube until the black line on the tube passes through the vocal cords

  4. Time to completion of endotracheal intubation

    Time frame: From the start of endotracheal intubation to 120 seconds

    An intubation attempt is defined as passing the laryngoscope blade between the patient's teeth. Duration of endotracheal intubation is defined from the moment the operator grasps the tube until the black line on the tube passes through the vocal cords

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Observational Study of Predictive Factors for Successful Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Without Stylet

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 1, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.