Comparing Dental Impression Methods for Children

The precision of dental restorations and the production of dental models has improved due to the acceleration of technical advancement and the introduction of computer-aided manufacturing.

The study's objective is to compare the conventional imprint approach with a digital one in order to compare patients' comfort levels, preferences, and treatment times among pediatric patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Dental Impression, Pediatric Dentistry, Satisfaction Behavior Personal Satisfaction

Age range

7 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Ege University

Izmir, 35040, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

In this study, 60 volunteers without any prior exposure to traditional or digital impressions took part. Using a C-type impression medium, conventional impressions of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches were taken. Digital impressions are taken using an intra-oral scanner at the same appointment. Following the impressions, a standardized questionnaire was used to assess the individuals' attitudes, preferences, and perceptions of the impression procedures. The Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale was used to assess the perceived source of stress and Frankl Behavioural Scale was used for assessing behaviour. After taking the impression, the processing phases of the impression techniques (working time, etc.), and parental satisfaction were noted.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

not to have a history of digital or conventional impression taking
not to have temporomandibular joint and periodontal discomfort
not to be using psychiatric or neuropathic drugs

Exclusion criteria

history of digital or conventional impression taking
TMJ disorder
Using any kind of drug that interferes pain perception

Treatment and study plan

Impression methods

Device

Both digital and conventional impressions were taken from same patients

Primary outcomes

Assessing patient preference and treatment comfort

Time frame: March 2023-June 2023

Parental satisfaction was measured with a structured questionnaire.The Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale was used to assess the perceived source of stress and Frankl Behavioural Scale was used for assessing behaviour. A survey was designed to test 3 areas of patient satisfaction regarding the impression experience: comfort, time, and novelty. The survey consisted of 7 statements with a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) below each statement anchored with "agree" and "disagree." The survey also included questions to determine whether the patient had previous experience with impressions.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ege University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Traditional and Digital Impression Methods for Pediatric Patients in Terms of Satisfaction

Acronym: Digital

Important dates

Study start: 2023
Primary completion: 2023
Study completion: 2023
First posted: May 21, 2024
Registry last updated: May 21, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed