Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06540040

Comparative Efficacy of Advanced and Traditional Wound Dressings in Post-Operative Orthopedic Care

Title: Comparative Efficacy of Advanced and Traditional Wound Dressings in Post-Operative Orthopedic Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective:

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of advanced wound dressings versus traditional gauze-based dressings in post-operative orthopedic care. The study aims to assess various parameters including patient comfort, pain management, ease of application, exudate management, and the incidence of early surgical site complications.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Base Hospital Delhi cantt

New Delhi, 110010, India

About this study

Title: Comparative Efficacy of Advanced and Traditional Wound Dressings in Post-Operative Orthopedic Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief Summary:

This study aims to compare the efficacy of advanced wound dressings with traditional gauze-based dressings in post-operative orthopedic care. The study evaluates patient comfort, pain management, ease of application, exudate management, and the incidence of early surgical site complications.

Study Type: Interventional (Clinical Trial)

Study Design: Randomized Controlled Single-Centre Open-Label Study

Primary Purpose: Treatment

Study Start Date: August 10, 2022

Study Completion Date: December 10, 2022

Primary Completion Date: December 10, 2022

Estimated Enrollment: 320 participants

Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open Label)

Interventions:

Participants undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures were randomized into four groups:

Group A: Aquacel Ag (Hydrofibre wound dressing with ionic silver) Group B: OPSITE (Transparent waterproof cotton pad with high Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate) Group C: MEPILEX POST OP BORDER (4-layer foam dressing with flex technology) Group D: Traditional dressing with gauze pieces, surgical pads, and porous paper adhesive strips

Objectives:

To assess the incidence of early surgical site complications such as blisters, infection, maceration, rashes, redness, swelling, and dehiscence at days 3, 7, and 14.

To determine the pain and discomfort experienced by patients during dressing changes using a visual analog scale.

To evaluate the ability to perform activities of daily living comfortably. To assess nurses' ease of application and removal of the dressings.

Outcome Measures:

Primary Outcome Measures: Incidence of surgical site complications at days 3, 7, and 14.

Secondary Outcome Measures: Pain levels during dressing changes, comfort and mobility in daily activities, ease of application and removal of the dressings, and patient satisfaction.

Data Collection Methods:

Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire validated by experts. The questionnaire included a wound assessment checklist, a 10-point Likert scale for patient comfort and mobility, a Visual Analog Scale for pain, and a rating scale for nurses' ease of application and removal.

Statistical Analysis:

Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD and median values. Data normality was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were analyzed using ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc tests as appropriate.

Qualitative variables were analyzed using the Chi-Square test or Fisher's exact test for cells with expected values less than 5.

A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics and Registration:

Detailed Description:

This study evaluates the comparative efficacy of different wound dressings used in post-operative orthopedic care. The focus is on advanced dressings such as Aquacel Ag, OPSITE, and MEPILEX POST OP BORDER, compared to traditional gauze-based dressings. The study measures various parameters including patient comfort, pain during dressing changes, ease of application and removal by nurses, and management of wound exudate. Data were collected at three time points: days 3, 7, and 14 post-surgery. The results aim to provide insights into the best practices for post-operative wound management in orthopedic patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 90 years Undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures, elective or trauma, with a surgical wound size of more than 5 cm Provided informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Open fractures Revision surgeries Established infections Ongoing pharmacological anticoagulation prophylaxis Predisposing skin conditions Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the constituents of the dressings Any associated systemic injury precluding early mobilization Unwillingness to participate

Treatment and study plan

Aquacel Ag

Device

Aquacel Ag is a Hydrofibre wound dressing composed of non-woven sodium carboxymethylcellulose fibers integrated with ionic silver. It is designed to provide a moist wound environment and has antimicrobial properties to help reduce the risk of infection. The dressing will be applied post-operatively and changed according to a standardized protocol.

Other names: Hydrofibre wound dressing with ionic silver

OPSITE

Device

OPSITE is a transparent waterproof dressing with a high Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate. It is intended to provide a protective barrier while allowing moisture vapor to escape, maintaining an optimal wound healing environment. The dressing will be applied post-operatively and changed according to a standardized protocol.

Other names: Transparent waterproof cotton pad

MEPILEX POST OP BORDER

Device

MEPILEX POST OP BORDER is a 4-layer foam dressing designed with flex technology for superior absorption and conformability. It helps manage exudate and protects the wound site. The dressing will be applied post-operatively and changed according to a standardized protocol.

Other names: 4-layer foam dressing with flex technology

Traditional Dressing

Device

Traditional dressing involves the use of gauze pieces, surgical pads, and porous paper adhesive strips. This type of dressing is commonly used in post-operative care to absorb exudate and protect the wound site. The dressing will be applied post-operatively and changed according to a standardized protocol.

Other names: Gauze pieces, surgical pads, and porous paper adhesive strips

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Early Surgical Site Complications

    Time frame: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14 post-surgery

    The primary outcome measure will be the incidence of early surgical site complications, including blisters, skin margin infection, maceration, rashes, redness, swelling, and wound dehiscence. These complications will be assessed at three time points: day 3, day 7, and day 14 post-surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Levels During Dressing Changes

    Time frame: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14 post-surgery

    Pain levels experienced by patients during dressing changes will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, where 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 corresponds to unbearable pain. This will be measured at day 3, day 7, and day 14 post-surgery.

  2. Patient Comfort and Mobility

    Time frame: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14 post-surgery

    Patient comfort and ability to perform activities of daily living will be assessed using a 0-to-10-point scale, where 0 indicates absolute discomfort and 10 indicates no limitation due to the dressing. This will be measured at day 3, day 7, and day 14 post-surgery.

  3. Nurses' Ease of Application and Removal of Dressings

    Time frame: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14 post-surgery

    Nurses will rate the ease of application and removal of the dressing using a 0-to-10-point scale, considering factors such as time taken, difficulty, and any issues encountered during the process. This will be measured at day 3, day 7, and day 14 post-surgery.

  4. Patient Satisfaction Levels

    Time frame: Day 14 post-surgery

    Patient satisfaction with the dressing will be assessed using a structured questionnaire. This will be measured at day 14 post-surgery.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nidhi Srivastava

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy of Postoperative Dressing in the Prevention of Early Surgical Site Complication and Facilitation of Early Mobilization After Orthopaedic Surgeries on Hip and Knee

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 6, 2024
Registry last updated
Aug 6, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.