Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05466604

Comparison of Hyaluronidase and Dexametasone in Reduction of Postoperative Edema

The present study is designed to reveal effectiveness of hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on reduction of postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection. For this purpose, 60 participants with symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth enrolled the present study. All measurements and evaluations were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days later the operation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth with bone retention
  • patients who are signed informed consent and acceptance of study involvement forms

Exclusion criteria

  • existence of any systemic disease
  • existence of any periodical drug intake
  • existence of difference in operation times of right and left impacted wisdom teeth extractions more than 5 minutes
  • existence of pregnancy
  • existence of breastfeeding

Treatment and study plan

Hyaluronidase Injection mesomedica

Drug

injection of 150 IU hyaluronidase to perioperative region, submucosally.

Dexamethasone dekort

Drug

injection of 8 mg dexamethasone to perioperative region, submucosally.

Primary outcomes

  1. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in hyaluronidase experimental group

  2. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in hyaluronidase experimental group

  3. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase experimental group

  4. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase experimental group

  5. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in hyaluronidase control group

  6. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in hyaluronidase control group

  7. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase control group

  8. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase control group

  9. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone experimental group

  10. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone experimental group

  11. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone experimental group

  12. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone experimental group

  13. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

  14. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

  15. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

  16. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

  17. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day

  18. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day

  19. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day

  20. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day

  21. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day

  22. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day

  23. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day

  24. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day

  25. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

  26. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

  27. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

  28. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 4. day

    Time frame: postoperative 4. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

  29. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 5. day

    Time frame: postoperative 5. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

  30. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 6. day

    Time frame: postoperative 6. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

  31. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

  32. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

  33. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

  34. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

  35. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 4. day

    Time frame: postoperative 4. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

  36. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 5. day

    Time frame: postoperative 5. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

  37. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 6. day

    Time frame: postoperative 6. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

  38. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

  39. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

  40. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

  41. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

  42. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 4. day

    Time frame: postoperative 4. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

  43. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 5. day

    Time frame: postoperative 5. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

  44. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 6. day

    Time frame: postoperative 6. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

  45. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

  46. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

  47. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

  48. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

  49. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 4. day

    Time frame: postoperative 4. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

  50. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 5. day

    Time frame: postoperative 5. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

  51. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 6. day

    Time frame: postoperative 6. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

  52. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

  53. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group preoperatively.

    Time frame: preoperative

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  54. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  55. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  56. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  57. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  58. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group preoperatively.

    Time frame: preoperative

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  59. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  60. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  61. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  62. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  63. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group preoperatively.

    Time frame: preoperative

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  64. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  65. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  66. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  67. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  68. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group preoperatively.

    Time frame: preoperative

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  69. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  70. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  71. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  72. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  73. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group preoperatively.

    Time frame: preoperative

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  74. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  75. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  76. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  77. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  78. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group preoperatively.

    Time frame: preoperative

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  79. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  80. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  81. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  82. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day.

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  83. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group preoperatively.

    Time frame: preoperative

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  84. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  85. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  86. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  87. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  88. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group preoperatively.

    Time frame: preoperatively

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  89. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day

    Time frame: postoperative 1. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  90. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day

    Time frame: postoperative 2. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  91. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day

    Time frame: postoperative 3. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  92. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day

    Time frame: postoperative 7. day

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Effects of Hyaluronidase and Dexamethasone on Reduction of Postoperative Edema in Impacted Wisdom Teeth Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 20, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 20, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.