Hyaluronidase Injection mesomedica
Druginjection of 150 IU hyaluronidase to perioperative region, submucosally.
NCT Number: NCT05466604
The present study is designed to reveal effectiveness of hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on reduction of postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection. For this purpose, 60 participants with symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth enrolled the present study. All measurements and evaluations were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days later the operation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
injection of 150 IU hyaluronidase to perioperative region, submucosally.
injection of 8 mg dexamethasone to perioperative region, submucosally.
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in hyaluronidase experimental group
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in hyaluronidase experimental group
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase experimental group
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase experimental group
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in hyaluronidase control group
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in hyaluronidase control group
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase control group
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase control group
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone experimental group
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone experimental group
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone experimental group
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone experimental group
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone controlgroup
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone controlgroup
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone controlgroup
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone controlgroup
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day
Time frame: postoperative 4. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day
Time frame: postoperative 5. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day
Time frame: postoperative 6. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day
Time frame: postoperative 4. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day
Time frame: postoperative 5. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day
Time frame: postoperative 6. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day
Time frame: postoperative 4. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day
Time frame: postoperative 5. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day
Time frame: postoperative 6. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day
Time frame: postoperative 4. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day
Time frame: postoperative 5. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day
Time frame: postoperative 6. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day
Time frame: preoperative
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: preoperative
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: preoperative
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: preoperative
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
Time frame: preoperative
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: preoperative
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: preoperative
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: preoperatively
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 1. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 2. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 3. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Time frame: postoperative 7. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
Hacettepe University
Other
Comparison of the Effects of Hyaluronidase and Dexamethasone on Reduction of Postoperative Edema in Impacted Wisdom Teeth Surgery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06193720
Edema, Nervous System Diseases
Beirut, Lebanon
View Trial DetailsNCT03690167
Edema, Nervous System Diseases
Ordu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02665533
Edema, Nervous System Diseases
Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07719270
Edema, Nervous System Diseases
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details