Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Dentistry
Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07175818
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two types of surgical suture materials, silk and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), used alone and in combination with cold atmospheric plasma systems, on postoperative outcomes such as pain, facial swelling, and limitation of mouth opening following mandibular third molar surgery. Written informed consent will be obtained from all volunteers prior to participation. For all groups, the surgical procedures will be performed on an outpatient basis under local anesthesia (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) by a single surgeon. After achieving deep local anesthesia by blocking the inferior alveolar, buccal, and lingual nerves, the incision will be made using a modified envelope flap. Bone osteotomy will be performed under copious irrigation with sterile saline, using a high-speed straight surgical handpiece (20,000-40,000 rpm) and a #10 surgical round bur. After successful extraction of the teeth, bone margins will be appropriately smoothed, and the surgical site will be irrigated thoroughly with saline. The mucoperiosteal flap will then be closed with sutures according to the group criteria. For groups assigned to plasma application, plasma will be applied to the surface of the sutures. Pre- and postoperative evaluations will be conducted for all patients regarding facial swelling, limitation of mouth opening, and pain, using the same techniques. Assessment of swelling and mouth opening limitation will also be performed by the surgeon. Quality of life will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively for all participants. Follow-up examinations will be performed preoperatively, on the 2nd postoperative day, and on the 7th postoperative day. At these time points, facial scans will be recorded using the Qlone application on an iPhone 14, and STL files will be generated.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After third molar extraction, the surgical wound will be closed using silk sutures without plasma application.
After third molar extraction, the surgical wound will be closed using PTFE sutures without plasma application.
After third molar extraction, silk sutures will be exposed to cold atmospheric plasma before being used for wound closure.
After third molar extraction, the surgical wound will be closed using PTFE sutures without plasma application.
After third molar extraction, silk sutures will be exposed to cold atmospheric argon plasma before being used for wound closure.
After third molar extraction, PTFE sutures will be exposed to cold atmospheric argon plasma before being used for wound closure.
Time frame: Preoperative 20 minutes before local anesthesia administration, 1st. day, 2nd. day, 3rd. day, 4th. day, 5th. day, 6th. day, 7th. day.
The patients' pain levels were evaluated using a 10-unit Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The patients were given a form on which they could mark the pain they felt as a score between 0 (no pain) and 10 (the most severe pain) at the following time points: 20 minutes before local anesthesia administration, and on postoperative day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, day 5, day 6, and day 7. After completing these forms, the patients returned them at the end of the 7th day.
Time frame: prior to surgery, on the second postoperative day, and on the seventh postoperative day
Facial swelling was assessed by performing three-dimensional (3D) facial scans at three different time points: prior to surgery (T0), on the second postoperative day (T1), and on the seventh postoperative day (T2). All scans were obtained in the same clinical room under consistent lighting conditions. For image acquisition, the Qlone appli-cation (EyeCue Vision Technologies LTD.), compatible with iOS devices (iPhone 14, Apple Inc., CA, USA), was utilized, offering a guided face-scanning process. Upon completion, each scan was converted into an STL file, which was subsequently transferred to the 3D Slicer software. The paired scans were then superimposed, and volumetric differences were calculated.
Time frame: prior to the operation, on the second postoperative day, and on the seventh postoperative day
Interincisal mouth opening was measured both before and after surgery using a standard monoblock caliper. During the assessment, participants were seated upright with the orbitomeatal plane aligned parallel to the ground. The maximum unassisted midline in-terincisal distance was recorded in millimeters (mm) at three time points.
Time frame: preoperatively, 2nd, and 7th days
Quality of life was evaluated before and after surgery using the OHIP-14 questionnaire. Postoperative assessments were carried out on the preoperatively, 2nd, and 7th days following the procedure. Each question was rated on a 4-point scale: 1 = "never," 2 = "sometimes," 3 = "fairly often," and 4 = "very often." The possible total score ranged from 0 to 56, with higher scores reflecting greater impairment in quality of life.
Izzet Acikan
Other
Effects of Cold Plasma Systems Applied to PTFE and Silk Su-tures Used in Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery on Post-operative Sequelae and Quality of Life
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06873152
Third Molars Extraction
Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06880952
Third Molars Extraction
Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT02495207
Third Molars Extraction
Damascus, Damscus, Syria
View Trial DetailsNCT07108465
Third Molars Extraction
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
View Trial Details