Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07702071

BLOCK-TRAUMA Study

This prospective cohort study will evaluate the association between the overall burden of regional anesthesia and early clinical outcomes in adult patients with polytrauma.

Patients with severe trauma often experience pain from multiple injury sites and may require more than one peripheral nerve block or continuous regional anesthesia catheter. While regional anesthesia can improve pain control and reduce opioid use, multiple blocks and catheters may also increase treatment complexity, local anesthetic exposure, motor weakness, and monitoring challenges.

The study will prospectively collect data on the number and type of regional anesthesia procedures, local anesthetic exposure, catheter use, pain intensity, opioid consumption, mobility, complications, and early recovery outcomes. The goal is to determine whether increasing regional anesthesia burden is associated with improved analgesia, functional recovery, or increased risk in polytrauma patients.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Vinnitsya university hospital

Vinnytsia, 21000, Ukraine

About this study

Background

Regional anesthesia has become an essential component of multimodal analgesia in trauma care, providing effective pain relief, reducing opioid requirements, improving respiratory function, and facilitating early rehabilitation. Advances in ultrasound-guided techniques have enabled clinicians to perform multiple peripheral nerve blocks and continuous catheter techniques in patients with complex polytrauma involving several anatomical regions.

Despite these advantages, there is currently no evidence-based framework defining the optimal extent of regional anesthesia in polytrauma patients. In contemporary trauma practice, some patients receive one regional block, whereas others undergo multiple single-injection blocks combined with continuous peripheral nerve catheters. Although increasing the number of regional techniques may improve analgesia, excessive regional anesthesia may also increase cumulative local anesthetic exposure, procedural burden, motor impairment, monitoring complexity, and the potential risk of adverse events. The concept of an optimal "regional anesthesia burden" has not previously been investigated.

Study Rationale

This study introduces the concept of Regional Anesthesia Burden (RAB), representing the overall intensity of regional anesthesia delivered during the acute management of polytrauma. Rather than evaluating individual block techniques, the study will investigate the cumulative impact of regional anesthesia on pain control, opioid requirements, functional recovery, and early clinical outcomes.

Regional Anesthesia Burden will be characterized using objective procedural variables, including:

number of peripheral nerve blocks; number of continuous regional anesthesia catheters; cumulative local anesthetic exposure during the first 72 hours; number of anatomical regions covered by regional anesthesia; expected motor block burden; total number of regional anesthesia procedures performed.

Study Design

This is a prospective observational cohort study. Consecutive adult patients with polytrauma receiving regional anesthesia as part of routine clinical care will be enrolled. No interventions beyond standard clinical practice will be performed.

Clinical management, including the choice of regional anesthesia technique, catheter placement, local anesthetic selection, concentration, and infusion regimen, will remain entirely at the discretion of the treating anesthesiologist according to institutional protocols.

Patients will be followed prospectively during the first seven days after injury. Pain intensity, opioid consumption, respiratory function, mobilization, complications, and recovery parameters will be recorded using standardized assessment tools.

Study Objectives

The primary objective is to determine whether increasing Regional Anesthesia Burden is associated with improved early clinical outcomes or whether excessive regional anesthesia is associated with diminishing clinical benefit and increased treatment-related risk.

Secondary objectives include evaluation of the relationship between Regional Anesthesia Burden and opioid consumption, functional recovery, pulmonary complications, motor impairment, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, and regional anesthesia-related complications.

Scientific Significance

The BLOCK-TRAUMA study is expected to provide the first prospective clinical evidence regarding the optimal extent of regional anesthesia in polytrauma patients. The results may contribute to future evidence-based recommendations regarding the appropriate use of multiple peripheral nerve blocks and continuous regional anesthesia techniques in severely injured patients and help define the balance between maximizing analgesia and minimizing procedural burden and complications.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of polytrauma, defined as traumatic injuries involving two or more anatomical regions.
  • Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16.
  • Hospital admission within 48 hours after injury.
  • Requirement for acute pain management during hospital treatment.
  • Receipt of at least one ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block and/or continuous peripheral nerve catheter as part of routine clinical care.
  • Ability to collect clinical data on regional anesthesia procedures, analgesic use, pain assessment, and early recovery outcomes.
  • Written informed consent provided by the patient or legally authorized representative, according to local regulations.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age younger than 18 years.
  • Isolated single-system injury without polytrauma. ISS <16.
  • Expected survival less than 24 hours after admission.
  • Severe traumatic brain injury or impaired consciousness preventing reliable pain and functional assessment, unless validated behavioral pain scales can be used.
  • Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics.
  • Pre-existing severe neuromuscular disease affecting motor function assessment.
  • Chronic opioid therapy before injury.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Enrollment in another interventional trial that may affect pain management or functional recovery outcomes.
  • Missing essential data required for assessment of Regional Anesthesia Burden.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Early Functional Recovery at Day 7

    Time frame: Day 7 after injury

    Early functional recovery will be assessed using the Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale (IMS), a 0-10 scale where 0 indicates no mobility and 10 indicates independent walking, with higher scores indicating better mobility, together with successful participation in rehabilitation activities by postoperative day 7.

  2. Composite Early Functional Recovery Score

    Time frame: Day 7 after injury

    Composite Early Functional Recovery Score, ranging from 0 to 2, where one point is assigned for achieving an Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale (IMS) score ≥8 (IMS range 0-10, with higher scores indicating better mobility) and one point for successful participation in scheduled rehabilitation activities by postoperative day 7. Total scores range from 0 to 2, with higher scores indicating better early functional recovery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and Day 7 after injury.

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10).

  2. Cumulative Local Anesthetic Dose

    Time frame: Through Day 7 after injury.

    The cumulative dose of local anesthetic administered through all regional anesthesia techniques, including single-injection peripheral nerve blocks and continuous peripheral nerve catheter infusions, from the time of injury until Day 7. The total dose will be calculated as the sum of all local anesthetic administered and reported in milligrams (mg). Higher values indicate greater exposure to local anesthetics.

  3. Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity

    Time frame: Through Day 7 after injury.

    Incidence of suspected or confirmed Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST), defined according to the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) criteria. Clinical features may include central nervous system manifestations (e.g., tinnitus, circumoral numbness, metallic taste, agitation, seizures, or loss of consciousness) and/or cardiovascular manifestations (e.g., arrhythmias, hypotension, cardiovascular collapse) occurring after administration of local anesthetics. Each event will be adjudicated as suspected or confirmed LAST based on clinical assessment and available diagnostic information.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dmytro Dmytriiev, PhD.Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+380674309449

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Regional Anesthesia Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Polytrauma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Acronym: BLOCK-TRAUMA

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.