Interventional Left Ventricular Assist System
DeviceInterventional left ventricular assist system for cardiogenic shock patients
NCT Number: NCT06127927
Imported Impella The price is relatively expensive and difficult for ordinary patients to afford. In order to better meet the growing clinical needs in China, Anhui Tongling Bionic Technology Co., Ltd. has developed an interventional left ventricular assist system. The test device was tested in preclinical animals It has shown good effectiveness and safety. Through the implementation of this clinical trial, the interventional left ventricular assist system The safety and effectiveness of the system for hemodynamic support in patients with cardiogenic shock have led to further development of this product in the country.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
In recent years, patients with severe heart disease, with coronary heart disease as the main disease spectrum, have been on the rise, and the mortality rate remains high. In routine clinical diagnosis and treatment, inotropic drugs and vasoactive drugs are used to correct shock and maintain blood flow. The cornerstone of mechanical stability, however, there is insufficient evidence that these drugs benefit patients in the long term. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a life support technology that was firstly used clinically in the 1950s. It can replace or partially replace the functions of the heart and/or lungs. And by increasing end-organ and coronary artery perfusion, reducing cardiac volume load, ventricular wall stress and myocardial oxygen consumption, etc. mechanism, quickly and accurately produce a stable hemodynamic effect, ultimately reducing the patient's pulmonary circulation congestion and myocardial ischemia. Reduce blood flow and infarction area and gain valuable time for follow-up treatment, so that patients with severe heart disease can be supported and transitioned to treatment great progress has been made in the treatment of heart diseases, and this technology has been widely used in the field of critical heart disease. 2017 American Heart Association The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends MCS for waiting for recovery of cardiac function or heart transplantation. Interimplantation and definitive treatment of advanced heart failure. Depending on location, MCS is divided into left ventricle Left ventricular assist device (LVAD), right ventricular assist device (Right ventricular assist device (RVAD), biventricular assist device (Biventricular assist device, BVAD) and total artificial heart (TAH). Currently, MCS commonly used in clinical practice mainly includes Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), Impella, TandemHeart and RVAD. The Impella system is an LVAD, it is divided into 3 models according to the diameter of the instrument: 12F (Impella 2.5), 14F (Impella CP) and 21F (Impella 5.0), the corresponding maximum output flows are 2.5L/min, 3.0~4.0L/min and 5.0L/min. The working principle of the device is to pump the left heart through the built-in micro axial flow pump at the front end of the catheter.
The oxygenated blood in the ventricle is pumped out through the catheter inlet, and then the axial flow pump is pumped directly into the ascending aorta to establish the left ventricular-ascending aorta. Aortic drainage pathway. Can help increase cardiac output (CO), increase aortic pressure and Coronary perfusion pressure, improve mean arterial pressure, coronary blood flow; while reducing left ventricular preload and pulmonary Pulse wedge pressure reduces ventricular wall tension and myocardial oxygen consumption. Acts as an active mechanical pump and partially replaces left ventricular function able. Impella is commonly used in the clinical treatment of cardiogenic shock. The ISAR-SHOCK study enrolled 26 patients with acute cardiac arrest. Comparing the efficacy of IABP and Impella 2.5 in patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction, the primary endpoint of the study Changes in cardiac index (CI) 30 minutes after MCS insertion. It was found that Impella A more significant increase in CI than after IABP, with 30-day mortality of 46% in both groups, confirms that Impella 2.5 Safety and feasibility in the treatment of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Two other studies also found that Similar conclusion RECOVER I study is a study that included 16 cases of cardiogenic shock or hypocardia after cardiotomy. A prospective, single-arm study of patients with displacement syndrome, the results of which indicate immediate blood loss after implantation of Impella 5.0 Fluid dynamics indicators improved significantly, and 93% of patients had improved cardiac function at discharge, with all patients at 30 days, 3 months, and 1 year. The survival rates were 94%, 81% and 75% respectively, proving the safety of Impella 5.0 for bridging treatment after cardiac surgery and feasibility. Currently, only Impella produced by the American company Abiomed has been approved by the FDA. However, imported Impella The price is relatively expensive and difficult for ordinary patients to afford. In order to better meet the growing clinical needs in China, Anhui Tongling Bionic Technology Co., Ltd. has developed an interventional left ventricular assist system. The test device was tested in preclinical animals It has shown good effectiveness and safety. Through the implementation of this clinical trial, the interventional left ventricular assist system The safety and effectiveness of the system for hemodynamic support in patients with cardiogenic shock have led to further development of this product in the country.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
For Pre-trial Phase
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
a Central venous pressure-capillary wedge pressure ≥10mmHg; b Central venous pressure-pulmonary artery diastolic pressure ≥10mmHg; c Cardiac tamponade.
For Formal Research Phase
Inclusion criteria
The drugs, doses and time of 1 high-dose or 2 medium-dose inotropic drugs are as follows:
Epinephrine: medium dose (<0.03 μg/kg/min), continuous pumping ≥15 minutes High dose (≥0.03 μg/kg/min), continuous pumping ≥15 minutes; Dobutamine: medium dose (<5μg/kg/min), continuous pumping ≥15 minutes High dose (≥5μg/kg/min), continuous pumping ≥15 minutes; Milrinone: medium dose (<0.3 μg/kg/min), continuous pumping ≥120 minutes High dose (≥0.3 μg/kg/min), continuous pumping ≥120 minutes; Low cardiac output syndrome: cardiac index 1.3≤CI≤2.2 L/min/m2;
Increased filling pressure: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure:
20≤PCWP≤30mmHg or pulmonary artery systolic pressure: 25≤PAP≤35mmHg 3) The subject can understand the purpose of the trial, voluntarily participate and sign the informed consent form reviewed and approved by the ethics committee; the subject agrees to complete the follow-up in accordance with the protocol requirements.
Exclusion criteria
Interventional left ventricular assist system for cardiogenic shock patients
Time frame: 30days
Survival was defined as recovery of cardiac function or survival to bridging therapy; Recovery of cardiac function was defined as no need for any mechanical support or IABP assistance 30 days after removal of the invasive left ventricular assist system or at discharge (whichever was longer).
Survival to bridging therapy was defined as survival to the induction of anesthesia for heart transplantation or placement of an implantable ventricular assist device.
Time frame: 30days
Major adverse events included death and stroke.
Time frame: 30days
Immediately after surgery, before weaning, and 24 hours after weaning, researchers evaluated the improvement in the subjects' hemodynamics after implantation of the trial device. (cardiac index(L/min/m2), mean arterial pressure(mmHg), pulmonary diastolic pressure(mmHg))
Time frame: 30days
Successful device placement is defined as the successful placement of a disposable left ventricular catheter pump into the left ventricle via the artery, and the delivery system can be withdrawn smoothly.
Technical success: After successful placement of the test device, blood can be pumped from the left ventricle into the ascending aorta, increasing the subject's cardiac output.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Fujian Medical University
Other
Evaluation the Efficacy and Safety of an Interventional Left Ventricular Assist System for Hemodynamic Support in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-group Target Value Study of Sustained
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07293923
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Cardiogenic Shock
Tbilisi, Georgia
View Trial DetailsNCT07656259
Cardio Vascular Disease, Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05699005
Anemia, Cardiogenic Shock
Lille, NORD, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06308055
Cardiogenic Shock, Cardiovascular Diseases
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial Details