Enzalutamide
DrugOral
Other names: Xtandi, MDV3100
NCT Number: NCT02294461
Purpose of the study was to assess the effect of enzalutamide on time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression as compared to placebo in chemotherapy naïve participants with progressive metastatic prostate cancer who have failed androgen deprivation therapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 3
CN00103, Beijing, China
The study was a multinational Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study of oral enzalutamide (formerly MDV3100) in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic participants with progressive metastatic prostate cancer who have disease progression despite androgen deprivation therapy. In order to join the study, participants could not have been previously treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Approximately 30 Chinese participants were allocated to the pharmacokinetic (PK) cohort. Participants in the PK cohort were required to be hospitalized from Day 1 before the randomization date to at least the completion of all the assessments planned on Day 3. All participants in the PK cohort underwent blood sampling for the PK analysis. Data reported in the results section was based on data cutoff dates of 20 Sept 2015 for efficacy and safety data and 20 Jan 2016 for PK outcome measures. The study completed double-blind period and is now in the open-label period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oral
Other names: Xtandi, MDV3100
Oral
Time frame: From the date of randomization to PSA progression median follow-up time is 6.47 months for enzalutamide and 2.99 months for placebo
The time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression was defined as the time from randomization to the PSA progression. The PSA progression was defined according to the consensus guidelines of Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2).For participants with PSA decline at Week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir, which would be confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later. For participants with no PSA decline at Week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date when a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the baseline was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value 3 or more weeks later. Time to PSA progression was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without confirmed PSA progression were censored.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to deaths from any cause median follow-up time is 42.32 months for enzalutamide and 26.81 months for placebo
Duration of overall survival was defined as the time from the randomization to deaths from any cause. For participants who were alive at the time of the data analysis, overall survival time was censored to the last know date the participants were known to be alive.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the rPFS event (deaths from any cause and radiographic disease progression) median follow-up time is 5.55 months for enzalutamide and 3.71 months for placebo
Duration of Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the rPFS event (deaths from any cause and radiographic disease progression). Radiographic disease progression is defined by RECIST 1.1 for soft tissue disease, or PCWG2 for bone lesions. If a participant met the criteria for more than 1 censoring rule, they were censored with the earliest censoring date. The radiographic progression date was the first date when progression definition was met, not confirmed.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the first skeletal-related event median follow-up time is 7.39 months for enzalutamide and 5.29 months for placebo
Time to first skeletal-related event (SRE) was defined as the time from randomization to the first skeletal-related event, defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, or change of anti-neoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Participants who have not had a SRE at the time of the analysis were censored at their last assessment indicating no evidence of SRE.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy median follow-up time is 7.39 months for enzalutamide and 5.19 months for placebo
Time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy was defined as the time from randomization to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy. It included only therapies for prostate cancer. When multiple cytotoxic chemotherapies were initiated, the first chemotherapy was used to determine the time to event. Participants who did not start cytotoxic chemotherapy at the time of analysis data cutoff were censored at the date of their last assessment indicating no evidence of cytotoxic chemotherapy usage.
Time frame: From baseline to the lowest post-baseline PSA result median treatment duration is 6.60 months for enzalutamide and 3.70 months for placebo
Best PSA response was defined as as ≥50% reductions in PSA level from baseline to the lowest post-baseline PSA result as determined by the central laboratory, with a consecutive assessment conducted at least 3 weeks later to confirm the PSA response. Only participants who had both baseline and post-baseline assessments were included in the analysis.
Time frame: From the date of randomization median treatment duration is 6.60 months for enzalutamide and 3.70 months for placebo
Participants with measurable soft tissue disease at screening visit (i.e., at least one target lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) who have an objective response (complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) during the study were included in the best overall soft tissue response assessment. The best overall soft tissue response was based on the investigator assessment using RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as complete resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings. PR was defined as partial resolution of at Least some of the clinical symptoms and physical findings.
Time frame: From the date of randomization, Single Dosing Day 1 and Multiple Dosing Day 85
Time frame: From the date of randomization, Single Dosing Day 1 and Multiple Dosing Day 85
Time frame: From the date of randomization, Single Dosing Day 1 and Multiple Dosing Day 85
Time frame: From the date of randomization, Single Dosing Day 1 and Multiple Dosing Day 85
N is the number of participants with available data at this time point.
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Days 2, 3, 8, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 86, 113, 141 and 169
N is the number of participants with available data at this time point.
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Multiple Dosing Day 85
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Multiple Dosing Day 85
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Multiple Dosing Day 85
Time frame: From first dose on Day 1 until 28 days after the last dose of study drug, or one day before the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy or an investigational agent for treatment of prostate cancer, whichever comes first, up to 123 months and 24 days
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, temporally associated with use of medicinal product, whether considered related to medicinal product. AE could therefore be any unfavorable & unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product. An AE was considered serious if, results in death; is life-threatening; results in persistent disability; results in congenital anomaly; requires inpatient hospitalization; or leads to prolongation of hospitalization; other medically important events. TEAE was defined as AE occurring from time of study drug administration on Day 1 until follow-up visit (28 days after last dose, or one day before date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy or an investigational agent, whichever comes first). AEs were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening; Grade 5 = Fatal.
Astellas Pharma Inc
Industry
Asian Multinational Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Oral Enzalutamide in Chemotherapy Naïve Subjects With Progressive Metastatic Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Androgen Deprivation Therapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02162836
Bulbo-Spinal Atrophy, X-Linked, Central Nervous System Diseases
Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT00878436
Bulbo-Spinal Atrophy, X-Linked, Central Nervous System Diseases
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01351688
Bulbo-Spinal Atrophy, X-Linked, Central Nervous System Diseases
Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT07723248
Bulbo-Spinal Atrophy, X-Linked, Central Nervous System Diseases
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details