Intervention group - telephone and print exercise intervention
BehavioralIntervention has previously been described.
NCT Number: NCT03164239
The purpose of this regional parallel-group RCT was to assess the effect of a six-month tailored telephone and email based physical activity intervention on various measures of physical fitness and body composition in a sample of physically inactive adults. A total of 111 physically inactive adults (40-55yr) from Agder, Norway were randomly allocated to either an intervention group (IG;n=56) or a no-intervention control group (CG;n=55). The IG received tailored exercise recommendations, every two months by email or mail (print) in addition to motivational follow-ups every second week, alternatively by email and telephone. Primary outcome measures were various objective measures of musculoskeletal and cardiorespiratory fitness in addition to various measures of body composition, including waist circumference, body mass index and fat percentage, which were assessed pre- and post-intervention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants were included in the study if they were
Exclusion criteria
Participants were excluded if they were
Intervention has previously been described.
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured by a modified Balke protocol on a treadmill and registered in ml/kg/min
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
The static back extension test recorded muscular endurance of the back extensors as number of seconds the subject managed to endure a static horizontal position, with their lower body supported by a bench (max 240 sec).
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Hand grip strength was registered to the nearest 1 kilogram (kg) using a hydraulic dynamometer
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Neuromotor fitness was registered using the one leg standing test where the duration each subject managed to hold a balancing position was recorded in seconds (max 60 seconds).
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Muscular dynamic endurance of and the ability to stabilize the upper body was registered using a modified push-ups test. The amount of correctly performed repetitions completed in 40 seconds, was recorded in number.
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Flexibility of the hamstring musculature was recorded using the sit-and-reach test to the nearest half centimeter, using a specially designed box.
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Flexibility of the shoulder joint was registered to the nearest centimeter, using the back-scratch test. The mean registered flexibility score of both shoulders was recorded.
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Explosive power in the lower extremities was recorded to the nearest centimeter, using the vertical jump test.
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Body mass index was calculated using the formula weight/height^2. Height and weight were measured using a measuring band (meters) and a weight scale (kilograms) respectively.
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Waist circumference was registered using a measuring band and the mean of two measures was recorded to the nearest half-centimeter.
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Fat percentage was measured using the bioimpedance machine InBody 720 and using skinfolds. Both registered body fat percentage.
Time frame: Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.
Cardiorespiratory fitness was measure by a modified Balke protocol on a treadmill and registered in l/min.
Time frame: This is one of the descriptive statistics which was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011.
Age was assessed by questionaire to the nearest whole year.
Time frame: This is one of the descriptive statistics which was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011
Gender was assessed using a questionnaire and outcome was either Female or male.
Time frame: This is one of the descriptive statistics which was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011
Educational level was assessed using a questionnaire as one of four different levels
Time frame: This is one of the variables determining inclusion to the study and was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011
Physical activity level was assessed using IPAQ- sf as minutes of physical activity per week.
Time frame: This is one of the variables determining inclusion to the study and was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011
Stage of change was assessed using a questionnaire as one of five alternatives.
University of Agder
Other
The Effect of a Tailored Telephone and Email Based Physical Activity Intervention on Physical Fitness and Body Composition: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: AiS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07597460
Behavior, Child Health
Santiago, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT06869369
Behavior, Motor Activity
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07729007
Behavior, Fitness
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07723807
Behavior, Motor Activity
Jaén, Spain
View Trial Details