Mohammed El-Sawy
Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia, 2266166, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07643441
This prospective comparative clinical study evaluated the accuracy and chairside time of complete-arch implant scans obtained using an intraoral photogrammetry system and a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system in edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Implant positions recorded by each system were compared with a reference dataset to assess linear and angular discrepancies. The chairside time required for data acquisition was also measured. The study aimed to determine whether mobile-phone-based photogrammetry can provide clinically acceptable accuracy comparable to that of intraoral photogrammetry while improving clinical efficiency. The findings may help clinicians select appropriate digital impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–50 year
All sexes
Observational
Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia, 2266166, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Accurate recording of implant positions is essential for the passive fit and long-term success of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Photogrammetry-based technologies have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional digital impression techniques for capturing implant positions with high accuracy. While intraoral photogrammetry systems have demonstrated favorable results, the clinical performance of recently introduced mobile-phone-based photogrammetry systems remains insufficiently investigated.
This prospective comparative clinical study aims to evaluate the accuracy and chairside time of complete-arch implant scans obtained using an intraoral photogrammetry system and a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system in edentulous patients restored with complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Each participant will undergo implant scanning using both systems according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The resulting digital datasets will be compared with a reference dataset to determine scan accuracy.
The primary outcome measures will be linear and angular discrepancies between the implant positions captured by each photogrammetry system and the reference dataset. Secondary outcome measures will include the chairside time required for scan acquisition. Statistical analyses will be performed to compare the accuracy and efficiency of the evaluated systems.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A photogrammetry-based digital impression system used to capture the three-dimensional positions of implants in complete-arch rehabilitations. The system records implant locations through specialized scan bodies and generates a digital dataset for subsequent accuracy analysis.
Other names: IPF Elite; Shining 3D; Intraoral Photogrammetry System
A smartphone-assisted photogrammetry system used to capture the three-dimensional positions of implants in complete-arch rehabilitations. The system acquires photographic data through coded markers and generates a digital dataset for subsequent accuracy analysis.
Other names: T-Marker; Extraoral Photogrammetry; Mobile-Phone-Based Photogrammetry System
Time frame: Immediately after scan acquisition and digital analysis (same study visit).
Assessment of the linear deviation (μm) between implant positions captured using intraoral photogrammetry and mobile-phone-based photogrammetry systems and those recorded in the reference dataset. Lower values indicate greater accuracy.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Menoufia University
Other
Accuracy of Complete-arch Implant Scans Obtained Using Intraoral Photogrammetry and a Mobile-phone Based Photogrammetry.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07177521
Edentulous Jaw, Jaw Diseases
Bari, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07065487
Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06080633
Edentulous Jaw, Jaw Diseases
Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05062863
Edentulous Jaw, Jaw Diseases
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial Details