LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product
GeneticLentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product is administered by IV infusion following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan.
Other names: betibeglogene autotemcel
NCT Number: NCT03207009
This is a single-arm, multi-site, single-dose, Phase 3 study in approximately 18 participants less than or equal to (<=) 50 years of age with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), who have a β0/β0, β0/IVS-I-110, or IVS-I-110/IVS-I-110 genotype. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me0 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Hopital d'enfants de la Timone, Marseille, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product is administered by IV infusion following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan.
Other names: betibeglogene autotemcel
Time frame: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant
TI was defined as a weighted average hemoglobin (Hb) >= 9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without any packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions for a continuous period of >= 12 months at any time during the study after drug product infusion.
Time frame: At Month 24 post-transplant
TI was defined as a weighted average hemoglobin (Hb) >= 9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without any packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions for a continuous period of >= 12 months at any time during the study after drug product infusion.
Time frame: From start of TI up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 25 months due to visit window)
Duration of TI was calculated as the time from the start of TI (i.e. first Hb >=9 with no transfusions in the preceding 60 days) up to the last available Hb at which the TI criteria are still met using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time frame: From drug product infusion to start of TI (up to Month 24 [actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 25 months due to visit window])
Time from drug product infusion to achievement of TI was calculated as the time from drug product infusion to the first hemoglobin at which a participant can be declared as TI (that is to 'start of TI + >= 12 months', dependent on Hb lab schedule).
Time frame: Timeframe varied by subject. For a given subject, the endpoint was calculated from 60 days after the last pRBC transfusion (so transfused blood did not confound the weighted average calculation) through the Month 24 Visit for that subject.
Weighted average Hb was defined as the weighted average of Hb values without any pRBC transfusions in the proceeding 60 days for a given subject. Ratio of the time between two Hb values and the time between the first and the last Hb values was used as the weight for calculation.
Time frame: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant
TR was defined as demonstration of a 60 percent (%) reduction in the annualized volume of pRBC transfusion requirements (in milliliter per kilogram [mL/kg]) in the post-treatment time period from 12 Months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 compared to the annualized mL/kg pRBC transfusion requirement during the 24 months prior to study enrollment.
Time frame: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Percentage of participants with a reduction in the annualized mL/kg pRBCs transfused from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 (approximately a 12-month period) of at least 50%, 60%, 75%, 90% or 100% compared to the annualized mL/kg pRBC transfusion requirement during the 24 months prior to enrollment.
Time frame: From 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Annualized number of pRBC transfusions from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 was reported.
Time frame: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant
Annualized volume of pRBC transfusions from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 compared to the annualized volume of transfusions during the 24 months prior to enrollment.
Time frame: From start of drug product infusion up to Month 24
Time from drug product infusion to last pRBC transfusion was reported.
Time frame: From last pRBC Transfusion up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 27 months due to visit window)
Time From Last pRBC Transfusion to the Month 24 was reported.
Time frame: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
The weighted average nadir Hb was defined as the most recent Hb prior to each pRBC transfusion, on the day of transfusion or within 3 days and, if there was a period of more than 60 days without transfusion, all Hb records between Day 61 and last follow-up or next transfusion (inclusive) was included. The weighted average nadir Hb during the period of 12 months post-drug product infusion to Month 24 was compared to the weighted average nadir Hb during the 24 months prior to enrollment.
Time frame: At Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Unsupported total Hb level was defined as the total Hb measurement level without any acute or chronic pRBC transfusions within 60 days prior to the measurement date.
Time frame: At Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Number of participants with unsupported total Hb levels (>=10 g/dL, >=11 g/dL, >=12 g/dL, >=13 g/dL, and >=14 g/dL) meeting the thresholds were reported at Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24. Participants were evaluable if they had an unsupported total Hb measurement at the specific timepoint, where unsupported total Hb level is defined as the total Hb measurement level without any acute or chronic pRBC transfusions within 60 days prior to the measurement date.
Time frame: From 6 to 24 months
Percentage of participants who have not received chelation therapy for at least 6 months following drug product infusion were reported.
Time frame: From last Iron Chelation up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 29 months due to visit window)
Time from last iron chelation use to last follow-up to 24 months was reported.
Time frame: From drug product infusion through Month 24
Therapeutic phlebotomy could be used in lieu of chelation in participants who had Hb consistently >= 11 g/dL and who were no longer receiving regular transfusions, at the discretion of the investigator. Number of participants who used therapeutic phlebotomy post Drug Product infusion for up to Month 24 were reported.
Time frame: From drug product infusion through Month 24
Annualized phlebotomy therapy usage (number of procedures per year, calculated from DP infusion through last follow-up) were reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Liver Iron Content by MRI at Months 12 and 24 were reported. Baseline is defined as value closest to but prior to conditioning.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Cardiac T2* on MRI from Baseline, Month 12 and 24 was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and 24
Serum ferritin was commonly used for an indirect estimation of body iron stores. Although sensitive, it is not specific for iron overload as it can be elevated in a variety of infectious and inflammatory states, and in the presence of cytolysis. Change from baseline in serum ferritin at Months 12 and 24 was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and 24
PedsQL GCS designed to measure health-related quality of life in pediatric and adolescents (2-18 years). It encompassed 4 dimensions of functioning (physical [8 items], emotional [5 items], social [5 items], school [3 items]). Age groups: Toddler (2-4 years), Young pediatric (5-7 years), Pediatric (8-12 years), Teens (13-18 years). The questionnaire was also completed by parent/caregiver to assess parents' perceptions of their children's quality of life. The Toddler group consisted of 21 items, using a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4); all other groups consisted of 23 items, with a 3-point Likert scale (0, 2, 4) for young pediatric, a 5-point Likert scale for pediatric and teens groups. All reported scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 for each domain where 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores correspond with higher quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that was most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. EQ-5D-Y was a version of instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. The EQ-5D-Y visual analog scale (VAS) consisted of a 20-cm vertical VAS, with anchors of 0 (worst imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). Respondents were asked to rate their own health state today by drawing a line from a box containing these words to the point on the scale that they felt most accurately reflected their current health state. The VAS was reported (raw data) on a scale of 0-100 where 0= death and 100= perfect health. Higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that was most widely used preference based health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. Participants age >=18 at time of informed consent were eligible to complete the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale (VAS) which consisted of a 20-cm vertical VAS, with anchors of 0 (worst imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). Respondents were asked to rate their own health state today by drawing a line from a box containing these words to the point on the scale that they felt most accurately reflected their current health state. The VAS was reported (raw data) on a scale of 0-100 where 0= death and 100= perfect health. Negative change in score indicated decrease in quality of life (as measured by EQ5D VAS) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
FACT-BMT is assessed bone marrow transplant related quality of life in adults. Total score was sum of sub-scale scores for 5 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Bone Marrow Transplantation Subscale. Each item scored on a 5-point Likert scale based on participant agreement with each statement: 0 for "not at all," 1 for "a little bit," 2 for "somewhat," 3 for "quite a bit," and 4 for "very much. Reported scores were transformed as follows: After taking into account reverse scores for questions constructed in negative form, subscale score for each domain was calculated by multiplying sum of item scores by number of items in subscale, then dividing by number of items answered. Total score was sum of subscale total added together and ranges from 0-148. Higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
SF-36 was designed to measure health-related quality of life in adults. The instrument consisted of 36 items that were aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning [1=yes, limited a lot, to 3=no, not limited at all], role-physical [1=all of time, to 5=none of time], bodily pain [1=very severe, to 6=none], general health [1=poor, to 5=excellent], vitality [1=none of time, to 5=all of time], social functioning [1=all of time, to 5=none of time], role emotional [1=all of time, to 5=none of time] and mental health [1=all of time, to 5=none of the time]). The 8 scales were summarized as Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health scales) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) score (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health scales). Reported summary scores were transformed on a scale from 0-100 (higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life), with change from baseline results being presented.
Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc.
Industry
A Phase 3 Single Arm Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Gene Therapy in Subjects With Transfusion-dependent β-Thalassemia by Transplantation of Autologous CD34+ Stem Cells Transduced Ex Vivo With a Lentiviral βA-T87Q-Globin Vector in Subjects ≤50 Years of Age
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06065189
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06024876
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Nanning, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03655678
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06831799
Alpha-Thalassemia, Anemia
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details