Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01855776

A Randomized Trial of Economic Incentives to Promote Walking Among Full Time Employees

This study aims to assess the uptake, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of a scalable walking programme for full-time employees both with and without incentives.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Singapore

About this study

The first part of this study comprises an in-home face-to-face survey with 950 full-time employees in Singapore. The survey aims to identify what an optimal programme might look like and to quantify the potential uptake of the programme, if offered. Stated preference conjoint analysis, which assesses individual preferences for attributes of specific programmes, will be used.

The second part of this study is a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of a 12-month walking programme. Up to 800 full-time employees will be recruited and allocated to one of four research arms: Control Group, Programme Only Group, Cash Incentive Group and Charitable Incentive Group. Participants in the intervention arms will be asked to track their physical activities using Fitbit Zip, a wireless pedometer, which automatically uploads the data to a custom website. Those in the incentive arms will earn money or raise money for charities if they meet weekly exercise targets. Those in the control and Programme Only groups with receive a weekly payment for participation. Incentives and participation payment will be provided from months 1 - 6, after which they will be withdrawn.

The key outcome variable of the RCT is defined as bouts (in minutes) of moderate to vigorous physical activity ("MVPA bouts") as measured via accelerometry. Data will be collected at baseline and month 6 and 12 assessments.

Findings from the RCT will also be used to determine the cost to employers of implementing each programme and the incremental cost-effectiveness of the incentive programmes compared to the basic programme without incentives. The primary hypotheses are that the basic programme will have lower costs per person than the cash or charity programmes, but that the incentive programmes will be more cost-effective relative to the less expensive and less effective basic programme.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Full-time employees living in Singapore
  • Aged between 21-65

Exclusion criteria

  • report difficulty doing 10 minutes of aerobic activities without stopping
  • report difficulty walking up 10 stairs without stopping
  • report difficulty performing basic activities of daily living
  • have any medical conditions that limit their ability to walk as a means of physical activity
  • self-identify medical conditions that limit ability to walk AND do not have medical consent
  • answer 'YES' to any PAR-Q questions

Treatment and study plan

Fitbit

Device

Fitbit Zip is a wireless pedometer that tracks steps of participants, and will be offered in conjunction with a tailored website with customized information for participants, employers, and/or charities.

Other names: Fitbit Zip; Wireless pedometer; Physical activity tracker;

Cash incentives

Behavioral

Incentives will be awarded to participants for meeting specified weekly step goals as measured by a pedometer.

Other names: Money, Cash, Financial Incentives

Charitable Incentives

Behavioral

Incentives will be awarded to charities selected by participants should the latter meet specified weekly step goals measured by a pedometer.

Other names: Donations, Charity

Usual Care

Other

The "usual care" programme consists of educational materials designed by the Singapore Health Promotion Board. It includes material on how to stay active, walking programmes, and healthy eating.

Other names: Educational Programme; Health Promotion Board

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in MVPA (Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity) bouts of participants from baseline to months 6 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months

    MVPA bouts are defined as the total number of minutes during each 1-week assessment period in which moderate or vigorous activity of at least 8 of 10 consecutive minutes are reached. This will be assessed via the Actigraph GT3XE-Plus Triaxial Activity Monitor.

    We will measure "MVPA bouts" at baseline, 6, and 12 months. We hypothesize that participants in the Programme Only, and Incentive groups record more "MVPA bouts" at 6 months compared to baseline. Furthermore, participants in the Incentive groups will record more "MVPA bouts" at 6 months compared to the Control and Programme only groups.

    We also measure "MVPA bouts" for all participants at 12 months. We do so to test if the "MVPA bouts" measured at month 6, can be sustained at month 12 when incentives are no longer being provided.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in VO2Max of participants from baseline to months 6, and 12.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months

    VO2Max is one of the major parameters to evaluate health and fitness of the cardiovascular system and is widely used for health promotion purposes. VO2Max will also be assessed via the Non Exercise Fitness Test (NEFT); NEFT predicts VO2max based on age, gender, BMI, resting heart rate and self-reported physical activities.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Other

Collaborators

  • Health Promotion Board, Singapore

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
May 16, 2013
Registry last updated
Jan 5, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.